Taiwan does not exist in a state of true peace. Its situation is more akin to a prolonged, unofficial state of political warfare. The Legislative Yuan, beyond being the venue of policy debate in Taiwan, has become the front line of resistance in the conflict. Understanding this strategic reality is crucial to understanding the amendments to the Act Governing Relations Between the People of the Taiwan Area and the Mainland Area (臺灣地區與大陸地區人民關係條例), which require legislators to obtain approval before traveling to China.
In his book On War, Prussian military theorist Carl von Clausewitz wrote that “war is the continuation of policy by other means.” The threat of military force has long ceased to be all Taiwan faces — political engagement, infiltration and psychological manipulation have steadily eroded Taiwan’s defenses. This is the essence of political warfare: influencing a society’s decisions without ever firing a shot.
A series of espionage cases uncovered this year are concrete examples of this kind of political warfare. From military personnel being influenced into changing their stance on defense to former staff members of the Presidential Office and the Ministry of Foreign Affairs being suspected of leaking classified information, these cases of infiltration are far from isolated incidents. They are the product of long-standing institutional vulnerabilities being repeatedly exploited.
The front line of this battle runs not along the middle of the Taiwan Strait, but right through the corridors of executive power and governance.
Another core theme of On War is the concept of a “center of gravity,” or the primary source of strength, will or stability of a military force, which, if targeted effectively, would cripple its ability to fight. Taiwan’s center of gravity is not any individual military asset, but its democratic credibility, parliamentary legitimacy and public trust in the nation’s will to defend itself.
Legislators control defense budgets, national security legislation, and have access to classified briefings. Their contact with foreign actors is of utmost strategic sensitivity. If legislators’ travel to China continues to lack oversight and transparency, it would leave a gap in the defenses against political warfare. Once the legislature’s external engagements become channels that hostile forces can exploit, democratic institutions risk being stripped of any meaningful autonomy, despite their external form appearing to remain intact.
The point of the legal amendments to the cross-strait act is not to cut off all exchanges, but to raise the cost of infiltration by requiring prior approval, full disclosure of activities, and imposing penalties for violations. If political infiltration is to be prevented, it can no longer be a zero-risk endeavor. The amendment is not a turn to authoritarianism, but a practical step toward defensive democracy. The regulations specifically target elected officials who hold power and access to classified information, not ordinary citizens.
Exchanges may continue, but the exercise of power must take place in the light of day. Only with transparency and accountability can institutions meaningfully serve as safeguards of democracy, rather than shackles.
Clausewitz warned that one of the greatest mistakes is to act on a false assumption of peace. In light of infiltration taking place through institutional channels, these legal amendments are not an overreaction; they are an acceptance of reality and a step toward patching vulnerabilities. In an era of authoritarian expansion, not pursuing a defense strategy would not be tolerance, but a dereliction of duty. Taiwan must make itself absolutely clear: We understand our position on the battlefield and we choose to defend our way of life through the rule of law and transparency.
Hsiao Hsi-huei is a freelance writer.
Translated by Gilda Knox Streader
Taiwan-India relations appear to have been put on the back burner this year, including on Taiwan’s side. Geopolitical pressures have compelled both countries to recalibrate their priorities, even as their core security challenges remain unchanged. However, what is striking is the visible decline in the attention India once received from Taiwan. The absence of the annual Diwali celebrations for the Indian community and the lack of a commemoration marking the 30-year anniversary of the representative offices, the India Taipei Association and the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center, speak volumes and raise serious questions about whether Taiwan still has a coherent India
Recent media reports have again warned that traditional Chinese medicine pharmacies are disappearing and might vanish altogether within the next 15 years. Yet viewed through the broader lens of social and economic change, the rise and fall — or transformation — of industries is rarely the result of a single factor, nor is it inherently negative. Taiwan itself offers a clear parallel. Once renowned globally for manufacturing, it is now best known for its high-tech industries. Along the way, some businesses successfully transformed, while others disappeared. These shifts, painful as they might be for those directly affected, have not necessarily harmed society
Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) spokesman Justin Wu (吳崢) on Monday rebuked seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers for stalling a special defense budget and visiting China. The legislators — including Weng Hsiao-ling (翁曉玲), Yeh Yuan-chih (葉元之) and Lin Szu-ming (林思銘) — attended an event in Xiamen, China, over the weekend hosted by the Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association, where they met officials from Beijing’s Taiwan Affairs Office (TAO). “Weng’s decision to stall the special defense budget defies majority public opinion,” Wu said, accusing KMT legislators of acting as proxies for Beijing. KMT Legislator Wu Tsung-hsien (吳宗憲), acting head of the party’s Culture and Communications
Legislators of the opposition parties, consisting of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), on Friday moved to initiate impeachment proceedings against President William Lai (賴清德). They accused Lai of undermining the nation’s constitutional order and democracy. For anyone who has been paying attention to the actions of the KMT and the TPP in the legislature since they gained a combined majority in February last year, pushing through constitutionally dubious legislation, defunding the Control Yuan and ensuring that the Constitutional Court is unable to operate properly, such an accusation borders the absurd. That they are basing this
RSS