Climate change is a multiplier of conflict, and governance gaps are a multiplier of climate risk. The connection between Sustainable Development Goal 16 on peace, justice and strong institutions, and goal 13 on climate action can no longer be ignored. India and Taiwan are well-placed to advance both goals in tandem through cooperation grounded in resilience, transparency and shared societal strengths.
Climate exposure already shapes internal stability in India. Extreme heat has increased sharply, with temperature records tumbling across northern India in recent years, exacerbating water shortages and heightening rural distress. In Rajasthan, Maharashtra and Telangana states, local administrations now routinely activate heat action plans — early warning systems, public-cooling centers, and coordination between health and disaster-response departments to protect vulnerable populations.
These efforts illustrate how effective institutions reduce climate impacts and preserve social stability. This was first demonstrated in Ahmedabad, where a municipal heat action plan introduced after a deadly 2010 heatwave lowered heat-related mortality in subsequent years and serves today as a model for other cities.
Taiwan’s achievements in disaster-risk governance are widely recognized, especially in typhoon preparedness and earthquake response. The Central Weather Administration’s real-time alert systems, an extensive culture of community drills and strong coordination between local and central authorities have saved lives.
Typhoon Morakot triggered catastrophic landslides in 2009. The government subsequently undertook institutional reform by investing in slope-land monitoring, rapid-evacuation protocols and deeper indigenous consultation in hazard-prone areas.
Deepening India-Taiwan cooperation offers a chance to jointly advance institutional solutions for peace and climate stability. While academic collaborations already cover ecological engineering, disaster management and community adaptation, expanding these into structured joint research or practical working groups would ensure progress even with limited formal diplomacy.
Taiwan’s expertise in remote sensing, early warning systems and digital governance could support India’s efforts to modernize disaster response infrastructure, while India’s large-scale climate adaptation experiments, such as the National Disaster Response Force, the National Cyclone Resilience Programme and community-driven watershed restoration in states like Rajasthan offer lessons that Taiwan’s smaller communities could quickly adapt.
In India, the critical functions in managing water resources, relief distribution and community harmony during climate-related shocks are performed by local self-help groups, farmer cooperatives and women-led governance bodies. Taiwan’s community volunteers, neighborhood wardens and indigenous councils do the same.
In several parts of India, migration rises when the monsoon patterns fail; such migration can stress urban systems and sharpen social tensions. Taiwan also faces water shortages that impair semiconductor production and food supplies. Taiwan’s advanced water-recycling technologies and management systems could support adaptation in India’s water-stressed industrial clusters, whereas India’s large-scale solar-energy rollout could support Taiwan in accelerating its energy transition without destabilizing local communities. By reducing economic volatility, both countries could lower the risk of social grievances that often escalate into political instability.
Cooperation on peace and climate is a pathway that could be insulated from political sensitivities through diplomatic channels. Because climate and disaster-management partnerships are often less politically contentious than security or economic agreements, they can function as low-risk, high-benefit avenues of engagement even within the constraints of geopolitics.
By explicitly linking climate governance with social stability, India and Taiwan could demonstrate how democratic partnerships contribute to peace in the Indo-Pacific region. Their collaboration could serve as a model, showing that climate protection and peace are interdependent and best achieved through open, cooperative approaches between democracies.
Sutandra Singha is an independent researcher with a doctorate in international studies from Jawaharlal Nehru University in New Delhi, specializing in climate change.
In the US’ National Security Strategy (NSS) report released last month, US President Donald Trump offered his interpretation of the Monroe Doctrine. The “Trump Corollary,” presented on page 15, is a distinctly aggressive rebranding of the more than 200-year-old foreign policy position. Beyond reasserting the sovereignty of the western hemisphere against foreign intervention, the document centers on energy and strategic assets, and attempts to redraw the map of the geopolitical landscape more broadly. It is clear that Trump no longer sees the western hemisphere as a peaceful backyard, but rather as the frontier of a new Cold War. In particular,
When it became clear that the world was entering a new era with a radical change in the US’ global stance in US President Donald Trump’s second term, many in Taiwan were concerned about what this meant for the nation’s defense against China. Instability and disruption are dangerous. Chaos introduces unknowns. There was a sense that the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) might have a point with its tendency not to trust the US. The world order is certainly changing, but concerns about the implications for Taiwan of this disruption left many blind to how the same forces might also weaken
As the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) races toward its 2027 modernization goals, most analysts fixate on ship counts, missile ranges and artificial intelligence. Those metrics matter — but they obscure a deeper vulnerability. The true future of the PLA, and by extension Taiwan’s security, might hinge less on hardware than on whether the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) can preserve ideological loyalty inside its own armed forces. Iran’s 1979 revolution demonstrated how even a technologically advanced military can collapse when the social environment surrounding it shifts. That lesson has renewed relevance as fresh unrest shakes Iran today — and it should
As the new year dawns, Taiwan faces a range of external uncertainties that could impact the safety and prosperity of its people and reverberate in its politics. Here are a few key questions that could spill over into Taiwan in the year ahead. WILL THE AI BUBBLE POP? The global AI boom supported Taiwan’s significant economic expansion in 2025. Taiwan’s economy grew over 7 percent and set records for exports, imports, and trade surplus. There is a brewing debate among investors about whether the AI boom will carry forward into 2026. Skeptics warn that AI-led global equity markets are overvalued and overleveraged
RSS