The limits of Taiwan’s Constitution are being severely tested.
With the “Bluebird movement” last year and the mass recall campaign earlier this year, it is clear that a significant number of voters are frustrated with the Legislative Yuan, controlled by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party.
The Democratic Progressive Party, under the leadership of President William Lai (賴清德), has refused to respond to what it sees as a ruthless tactic aimed primarily at hobbling the government.
The Executive Yuan has refused to countersign amendments to the revenue-sharing law, while the legislature is to discuss a motion to impeach Lai.
At the root of these developments is a confluence of two factors. The first is the Constitution, which is a patchwork of contradicting legal ideals and political compromises. The second is the rising trend of polarization amid global uncertainty.
The Constitution — implemented in 1947 and amended seven times in Taiwan from 1991 to 2004 during a phase of accelerated democratization — is a mix of European parliamentary ideals, Sun Yat-sen’s (孫逸仙) thoughts and US political practices.
The original Constitution featured a president selected by a body of delegates to act as a figurehead “mediator.” The head of government was vested in the premier, who had to be approved by the Legislative Yuan.
After decades of rule under Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and his son, Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), the president came to be seen as the highest seat of political power. As such, popularly electing the president became the goal for the democracy movement in the 1980s and 1990s.
As the president became directly elected in 1996, Taiwan contended with how to divide power and accountability between the president, the premier and the legislature. Through a series of compromises, the system evolved to what it looks like today: a patchwork.
That framework is the result of a gradual process that minimized social upheaval and sought consensus in small steps. In other words, Taiwan’s piecemeal constitutional structure is a price paid for a peaceful transition to democracy — a transition better than a violent one, but that still came with costs.
Checks and balances between the legislative, executive and judicial branches in Taiwan are shoddy at best. The system has fundamental contradictions.
The president is popularly elected with a mandate to govern, but can only do so through their appointed premier. The premier answers to the legislature, but cannot dissolve the legislature on their own. The legislature oversees the premier, but has no power over their appointment.
Crucially, there are no effective veto or veto override powers between the executive and legislative branches.
In any system, some room for interpretation is necessary to allow for flexibility and applicability in unforeseen situations, but it also leaves room for abuse. Taiwan’s constitutional crises are testing the edges of the system.
Why not change the Constitution? It is commonly believed that after the 2004 amendments, the threshold needed to amend the Constitution was made so high — requiring approval by more than half of the electorate in a referendum — that amendments are all but impossible.
That was more than 20 years ago. The threshold is high, but as the stakes are even higher maybe it is time to ignite the imagination of the Taiwanese body politic to create a system that works.
Yeh Chieh-ting is a director of US Taiwan Watch, a think tank focusing on US-Taiwan relations. He is an adviser to the International Taiwan Studies Center at National Taiwan Normal University and is the founder of Ketagalan Media.
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
The saga of Sarah Dzafce, the disgraced former Miss Finland, is far more significant than a mere beauty pageant controversy. It serves as a potent and painful contemporary lesson in global cultural ethics and the absolute necessity of racial respect. Her public career was instantly pulverized not by a lapse in judgement, but by a deliberate act of racial hostility, the flames of which swiftly encircled the globe. The offensive action was simple, yet profoundly provocative: a 15-second video in which Dzafce performed the infamous “slanted eyes” gesture — a crude, historically loaded caricature of East Asian features used in Western
Is a new foreign partner for Taiwan emerging in the Middle East? Last week, Taiwanese media reported that Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) secretly visited Israel, a country with whom Taiwan has long shared unofficial relations but which has approached those relations cautiously. In the wake of China’s implicit but clear support for Hamas and Iran in the wake of the October 2023 assault on Israel, Jerusalem’s calculus may be changing. Both small countries facing literal existential threats, Israel and Taiwan have much to gain from closer ties. In his recent op-ed for the Washington Post, President William
A stabbing attack inside and near two busy Taipei MRT stations on Friday evening shocked the nation and made headlines in many foreign and local news media, as such indiscriminate attacks are rare in Taiwan. Four people died, including the 27-year-old suspect, and 11 people sustained injuries. At Taipei Main Station, the suspect threw smoke grenades near two exits and fatally stabbed one person who tried to stop him. He later made his way to Eslite Spectrum Nanxi department store near Zhongshan MRT Station, where he threw more smoke grenades and fatally stabbed a person on a scooter by the roadside.