Across many parts of the world, migration has become a delicate topic. The US, the UK, Australia and several nations in Europe have tightened work visa rules, raised income thresholds and adopted more cautious approaches to mobility. These shifts reflect a broader global mood in which migration is treated as something that must be carefully justified and managed. As debates grow more sensitive, migrants are increasingly discussed in terms of economic usefulness rather than as people whose lives unfold alongside those of the communities where they live and work.
For Taiwan, these global developments offer a valuable moment for reflection. The nation’s experience with migration has been shaped by a distinctive ethno-national identity formed through shared cultural histories and local social experiences. For many decades, Taiwan’s economy was built mainly through the efforts of its own population, and large groups of foreign workers or foreign residents were not part of daily life in most communities. Because of this, migration is still relatively new as a visible, lived experience for many Taiwanese, and public attitudes are naturally evolving as more people encounter newcomers in ordinary settings such as workplaces, neighborhoods and schools.
Yet Taiwan is at a stage where migrants are not simply helpful, they are necessary to sustain the nation’s momentum.
Many sectors face well documented labor shortages. Families rely on foreign caregivers to support daily life, factories and processing plants depend on international workers to keep production moving, and growing industries such as semiconductors, technology services and advanced manufacturing need foreign graduates and technical workers to fill talent gaps. Highly skilled professionals from abroad also strengthen research, global connectivity and innovation. These contributions are not replacements for local effort. They form part of the broader matrix that allows Taiwan to continue growing, competing and thriving.
People who live and work in the same place for long periods undergo changes that policymakers cannot ignore. They develop routines, form friendships, raise families and build communities. This is what academics describe as spatial mobility, the way people begin to live differently when they become embedded in a place. Many stay longer than they first imagined, taking second or third contracts, moving from blue-collar roles into intermediate skill or technical jobs. This is temporal mobility, where migration becomes a longer life journey rather than a brief chapter.
Over time, communities begin to take shape, whether through small cultural hubs, informal support networks or familiar gathering spaces. This is diaspora formation, and it is already happening across Taiwan among Indonesian, Filipino, Vietnamese, Indian, Thai and other groups.
The question, then, is not whether Taiwan is becoming a society shaped partly by migration. It already is. The real question is whether Taiwan is prepared for what this means socially, culturally and institutionally. Much of Taiwan’s current migration system still treats foreign workers, foreign graduates and even many skilled professionals as temporary or rotating labor, even when the conditions of their work and the needs of society suggest something more lasting. Policies that allow longer stays do exist, but they are sometimes inconsistent or vulnerable to public unease. When new measures are introduced and then withdrawn or adjusted, it creates uncertainty for the very people Taiwan hopes to attract.
Global trends in anti-migration politics offer a gentle, but important lesson. When societies are not prepared for demographic or labor market change, uncertainty fills the space that clear information should occupy. People might begin to see migrants as competitors rather than contributors, or as short-term workers rather than neighbors. Taiwan does not need to repeat this pattern. In fact, Taiwan has the advantage of acting early, long before external pressures or social tensions grow.
What the nation needs most is clarity of why migrants are essential to Taiwan’s future, and how their presence strengthens rather than threatens the communities around them. Labor shortages, caregiving needs and the demands of advanced industries cannot be met without people. This simple truth, expressed calmly and honestly, can build confidence and understanding.
Taiwan is standing at an important crossroads, and it is a promising one. As migration politics become more cautious in other regions, Taiwan has the chance to shape its own approach with balance and foresight. The nation can maintain its distinct identity, while also recognizing that those who come to work, study and contribute here are already part of its ongoing story. Migrants are not only part of Taiwan’s labor force; they are part of its future. With clear communication, considerate policies and an atmosphere of mutual respect, Taiwan can continue moving forward with stability and warmth.
Uma Chinnannan is an independent researcher affiliated with the International Doctoral Program in Asia-Pacific Studies at National Chengchi University. Her work focuses on migration, talent mobility and India-Taiwan relations.
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS