On a dusty afternoon in the northern reaches of China, dozens of giant trucks line up to fill up on coal for washing and processing. Others wait to take away tonnes of waste rocks and dirt. It is a common sight at any large, open-pit operation — except the juggernauts at the Yimin mine in Inner Mongolia are moving without a human being in sight, part of a rapidly growing, nationwide fleet of autonomous vehicles.
Many of the men who once drove the trucks for state-owned China Huaneng Group Co now work away from the coalface, often as safety supervisors or control room operators.
It is a snapshot that encapsulates the biggest energy-transition predicament in China. Solar farms are proliferating, green technology is advancing rapidly and the dirtiest fossil fuel is ultimately to be phased out, but that still leaves the government with the problem of dismantling a vast economic structure built to dig, distribute and burn coal — and with the question of what it does with the workers who once operated it.
Illustration: Mountain People
Yimin mine director Shu Yinqiu says technological advances mean safety and efficiency, not job losses. However, China accounted for nearly half of the 6.1 million people employed in coal mining globally last year, according to the International Energy Agency, with more employed by related industries such as power.
Concentration can be acute. In Shanxi Province, where more than one-third of the nation’s coal workforce operate, as many as 350,000 jobs are to be lost between this year and 2030, a report last year by Peking University’s Institute of Energy and the UN Development Programme said. Once the ripple effect into the wider economy is considered, job losses in related industries in the north could surpass 1.5 to 1.7 million by 2030.
Green industries have created more than 7 million jobs and ultimately there would be net growth in employment from the energy transition, but that is not necessarily the experience for many on the coal belt, especially older workers.
“Coal remains deeply embedded in the economic and social fabric of many Chinese communities,” said Gang He (何鋼), associate professor at Baruch College, City University of New York, who specializes in energy and climate policies. “A transition away from coal is therefore not only an energy transformation, but also an economic and employment transition that must be managed with care.”
Coal has been closely tied to the Chinese Communist Party’s history and to its efforts to transform the nation’s economy over the past decades. Cheap, plentiful, domestic energy — and a large industrial workforce — were the cornerstones of the nation’s early development and remain vital. However, while industrial transition is not a new headache — and examples of botched efforts abound, from the Appalachian region in the US to the valleys of south Wales in the UK — the scale is altogether different in an economy that is also the largest consumer and producer of coal.
China has already seen bursts of popular anger. As far back as 2009, a labor protest turned deadly when workers at Tonghua Iron and Steel Group killed a manager amid fears a private takeover would result in job losses. The provincial government eventually scrapped the buyout and the company was absorbed by another state-owned outfit.
Experience elsewhere also suggests poorly managed transitions result in green backtracking. Take US Senator Joe Manchin, a conservative Democrat, who watered down the most ambitious US climate legislation to date in response to voter concerns around the collapse of coal mining in his state of West Virginia. If that were to happen in the world’s top polluter, there would be grave repercussions for the global climate fight.
“The ability of China to manage this transition in a rapid and just manner will have a significant impact on how it and, to a large extent, the world uses energy and addresses climate change,” Gang said.
To date, there has not been a single, unified official plan to manage the social and economic impact. Instead, Beijing has crafted dozens of national and regional policies in areas that depend on resource extraction. Those efforts accelerated in the mid-2010s, when overcapacity issues caused industry consolidation and widespread closures of smaller mines.
The resulting lack of clarity is troublesome, especially as the government steps back from the most aggressive interpretations of its plan to see the use of coal begin to shrink. Party officials in October said that they would promote a peak in coal use from next year to 2030, a slight but significant change from an April 2021 speech in which Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) said the nation would phase it down during the period, and even hitting a peak would not mean a rapid decline in consumption — instead, a lengthy plateau would likely follow.
The Chinese State Council last month said that coal would remain the nation’s energy mainstay, as the nation makes the most of its flexibility to balance intermittent renewables while reducing its use over time. New coal-fired power plants are still being approved and built to support the fluctuating generation from its rapidly growing fleet of wind and solar farms.
“We are making major efforts in developing new and clean energy, but to guarantee power is available, we’re not totally giving up on coal,” National Energy Administration Director-General of Development and Planning Ren Yuzhi said earlier this month.
China’s existing efforts at moving workers beyond coal already point to a drawn-out endgame. Take Fuxin, a city of about 900,000 people in northeastern Liaoning Province, and the first place to see a so-called “just transition” with Chinese characteristics.
Coal mining began in the province about 200 years ago during the Qing Dynasty. It expanded rapidly, and at heavy human cost, under Japanese occupation during World War II. Fuxin’s Haizhou open-pit mine was once so central to China’s economy that it was featured on the 5 yuan (US$0.71 at the current exchange rate) banknote in 1960. The site closed in 2005, its reserves depleted after more than half a century of operation.
By then, officials had already begun directing billions of yuan in investment into industries such as agriculture, wind power and tourism. The Haizhou pit — 4km long and 2km across — is now a national park and the local government is developing a scenic eco-trail, but the residents of a town where the mine once employed virtually a person from each household have mixed feelings. On a recent visit, they described a comfortable city, with affordable housing and a reasonable cost of living, but without the vitality and job creation it once had.
Zhang Haotian was born in Fuxin in 1994 and remembers the old days, although the mines shut long before he left for university in the US and later on to start a school training baristas in the technology hub of Shenzhen. He spends half the year in the city and has started his own cafe featuring high-end brews and American food, but most of his friends from school have left to find more opportunities in bigger cities.
“The city lacks a core source of income for economic development,” Zhang said. “There are no tech companies here.”
Beijing has launched dozens of policies and initiatives aimed at workforce redevelopment, economic diversification and environmental reclamation in resource-dependent cities, said researchers Weila Gong at the University of California, Davis, and Joanna Lewis, professor at Georgetown University.
Those policies in some ways surpass the scope of transition planning in many other nations, they said, but the government also tends to distribute resources through state-owned coal companies. That often leads to more investment in related industries, such as coal-to-chemicals or metallurgy, which can prolong local economies’ reliance on coal.
Training for other roles is limited, leaving workers fretting they have been left behind.
“The Chinese government has primarily focused on reducing the burden of coal businesses rather than that of coal workers and communities in the coal transition,” the two academics wrote in a study published last year. “This includes encouraging coal enterprises to merge and reorganize, and urging banks and financial institutions to provide credit and loan support to competitive firms in the sector.”
As if to prove the point, Fuxin is pinning its hopes on coal again. In October, state-owned China Datang Corp resumed construction — after more than a decade of delay — on a 25 billion yuan chemical plant that is to convert fuel from Inner Mongolia into natural gas.
The coal-to-chemicals industry creates jobs in mining areas and brings the added benefit of cutting the nation’s dependence on foreign energy sources by displacing oil used in traditional petrochemicals production. It is also highly polluting, with emissions that far outpace those from standard processes using gas or petroleum.
Another high-profile transition experiment is taking place in Datong, the nation’s coal capital, right in the heart of Shanxi Province, a mining region that produces more of the fuel than any nation outside China.
Here, coal is still king. Dozens of mines still dot the city’s outskirts. The roads are crowded with signature red trucks, smeared black with dust, carrying coal to a railway that connects to a port 650km away for distribution along the eastern seaboard. However, Datong has also poured billions of yuan into tourism. Shops and hotels have been built near the Yungang Grottoes, a series of Buddhist temples and caves cut from sandstone more than 1,500 years ago. The city has also spent about 16 billion yuan on a resettlement plan to move coal workers out of dormitories next to mines and into a community known as the Hengan New Area. About 300,000 people live there now in mid-rise apartments, surrounded by bustling streets, open-air markets, restaurants and bars. Moving away from the mines has had other benefits as well.
“We have blue skies now,” said Ren Jinyou, who owns a restaurant selling donkey burgers in the new district. “When I was a kid, my white shirt’s collar turned black after a day outside.”
It has brought another dimension to the city’s economy, said Zhao Hong, an accountant working for a popular local restaurant. In the summer, lunchtime bookings are full from new visitors to the grottoes, but still, tourism is seasonal, and the city’s mines continue to produce 144 million tonnes a year, more than Germany.
“It’s impossible to replace coal overnight,” she said.
The city also remains prone to the whims of the industry. A spate of mine closures after a period of oversupply in 2016 caused the population to fall by 200,000 people in the 2020 census, to about 3.1 million. A spike in prices in 2021 brought a brief rebound, but another slump this year has meant pay cuts, and market vendors complain that people are cutting back purchases to stretch their wallets.
Ren said he already sees the city’s identity shifting, with younger people chasing opportunities in bigger cities.
“Coal is like weather to us — when it’s good, everything thrives,” he said. “When it’s weak, it affects us all.”
When I visited Taiwan last summer, I called on the nation to use its status as a technology superpower to build superweapons. It is obvious to me as I return a year later that Taiwan is now answering that call. By 2030, Taiwan envisions a domestic drone hub, capable of producing large quantities of drones per year. The nation continues to tighten cooperation across the private sector, scientific researchers and the elected government, on creating new and innovative production avenues for defense, while efforts to become central to the “democratic supply chain” are only increasing. Anduril is seeing all of these positive
Singaporean former Prime Minister and current senior minister Lee Hsien- Loong(李顯龍) last month stood on Chinese soil and told Beijing that Singapore cooperates because of “shared interests”, not because of common “ethnic descent,” a significant statement that has upended China’s cognitive warfare tactics of “ethnic nationalism.” Along with using its military buildup and economic growth to expand its international dominance, China has long deployed ethnic politics to promote the idea that all ethnic Chinese around the world, regardless of citizenship, share a tight bond with the Chinese motherland, by which it means the regime of the People’s Republic of China (PRC)
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) in San Francisco on Tuesday last week said if she had not met with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), she would have been “just a plain” and “even negligible” KMT chairperson, bluntly signaling the role she is playing in her visit to the US — Beijing’s messenger from Taiwan. Cheng and her delegation arrived in the US on Monday last week for a two-week visit across five major cities. Her party said the group is scheduled to meet with US lawmakers, officials, policy experts and businesspeople. Before departing, Cheng said her trip
RSS