The deluge of crises over the past five years, from the COVID-19 pandemic to wars in Ukraine and Gaza, to the US’ destructive tariff policy, has put the global order under immense pressure. Multilateral institutions — including the UN and the WTO — are struggling to respond effectively to an increasingly complex geopolitical landscape, where international cooperation is being steadily supplanted by great-power politics.
Amid this economic fragmentation and political disarray, the global south and philanthropic organizations must take a pragmatic approach to protecting development gains and pursuing climate resilience. That means building issue-based coalitions, strengthening domestic institutions and making the most of opportunities to lead on the global stage, such as South Africa’s G20 presidency and India’s turn as BRICS+ chair next year.
Perhaps most consequential is Brazil’s role as host of this year’s UN Climate Change Conference (COP30), which is expected to focus on delivering past commitments and scaling up outcomes. Equally important would be the updated Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs), which all signatories of the Paris Agreement must submit, ideally within the next month.
According to the UN Environment Programme’s Emissions Gap Report 2024, there is a need for NDCs that are better aligned with the agreement’s pathway for limiting the rise in global temperatures to 1.5°C above preindustrial levels. More ambitious NDCs, in turn, would require greater international collaboration and reforms to the global financial architecture.
Action has become imperative. Despite the falling cost of renewable energy, fossil-fuel use continues to grow. As a result, climate change and biodiversity loss have accelerated. Meanwhile, efforts to close the climate-finance gap have fallen short.
The “new collective quantified goal” on climate finance agreed at COP29 in Baku, Azerbaijan, is grossly inadequate, and the situation looks set to deteriorate, as the US retreats inward and other developed countries significantly increase defense spending.
Likewise, progress on the UN Sustainable Development Goals has stalled, owing to a persistent US$4 trillion annual financing gap. While progress has been real and substantial, it remains fragile and unequal. As flows of official development assistance dry up, and global debt reaches a record high, developing innovative ways to mobilize domestic and foreign capital has become an urgent priority.
With that goal in mind, the Fourth International Conference on Finance for Development established a reform-oriented global financing framework and committed to a rules-based multilateral trading system. The conference also launched the Borrowers’ Forum, a platform that enables debt-distressed countries to negotiate collectively.
Global south countries are learning not to pin their hopes on the rich world’s empty promises. As a result, they are shifting their focus to implementation. Brazil launched an Action Agenda for COP30, while South Africa’s G20 presidency has highlighted the nexus of climate, development and debt.
Faced with unsustainable debt levels and prohibitive borrowing costs, global south — and particularly African — governments must improve fiscal resilience to scale up long-term investments in climate action and respond quickly to climate-related shocks. That by no means absolves developed countries of their financial obligations under Article 9 of the Paris Agreement, but it represents a pragmatic imperative for global south countries that do not want their climate and development priorities held hostage to great-power politics.
In such an environment, philanthropic organizations must reassess their role in helping national and regional actors achieve development and climate goals. That means confronting financing gaps in low and middle-income countries, as well as the transition risks that all countries face, while addressing existing priorities such as inflation, unemployment and social unrest, which implies the need to expand social protection for the most vulnerable.
Instead of taking an everything-everywhere-all-at-once approach, philanthropies must be more focused on expanding their reach, while also improving coordination among themselves. That is especially true in Africa, where only a handful of large philanthropic organizations are based.
The Just Energy Transition Partnerships in South Africa, Vietnam and Indonesia have shown that philanthropies can play a valuable role in establishing government-led country platforms for coordinating public and private-sector finance in service of development and climate goals. Philanthropic organizations can provide early financing, support capacity building and bring other actors, including community groups and small and medium-size enterprises, on board.
Another priority should be situating climate action in a development context. In Africa, that means helping countries reduce their debt overhangs, bolster fiscal resilience and devise credible investment plans for facilitating climate action. All of this should build the countercyclical economic momentum needed for sustainable growth.
However, it requires philanthropies to start engaging with the multilateral processes, using their flexibility, risk tolerance and trust-building capacity to advance the global south’s interests by enhancing institutional and human capacity.
To deliver on-the-ground results in climate-vulnerable countries confronting a confluence of global crises, philanthropies must collaborate with governments, grassroots organizations and development banks, concentrating on supporting systemic change as much as on providing relief. That would require staying focused on strategic climate and development objectives, and being prepared to manage trade-offs.
The new age of great-power politics will eventually pass, but global south governments and philanthropic organizations cannot afford to bide their time until then. Instead, they must take concrete steps toward ensuring sustainable growth and strengthening international partnerships. The only way to emerge from this era of disorder is to confront it head-on.
Saliem Fakir is founder and executive director of the African Climate Foundation. Prabhat Upadhyaya is adviser on the G20 and multilateral affairs to the African Climate Foundation.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences
RSS