An avalanche of cheap Chinese goods is landing on doorsteps across Latin America. Bargain-hungry consumers are giddy, local retailers are getting pummeled and customs agencies are swamped.
Enter the taxman.
Governments from Mexico to Chile are starting to levy low-cost imports in a bid to protect local businesses from the glut coming out of China’s bloated factories. Spearheading the onslaught are Chinese e-commerce companies Temu, SheIn Group Ltd and AliExpress, part of Alibaba Group. The aggressive trio is still dwarfed by incumbent MercadoLibre Inc and Amazon.com Inc, but the trend is changing fast.
In the first half of this year, Temu’s monthly active users in Latin America soared 143 percent year-on-year to 105 million, according to market intelligence firm Sensor Tower.
Governments are taking note.
“These platforms are going to ruffle feathers and have ripple effects on local economies,” said Margaret Myers, director of the Asia and Latin America program at the Inter-American Dialogue.
The region’s new import taxes mirror pushback elsewhere. The US would start to tax low-value packages from Friday, while the EU is investigating Temu for allegedly failing to stop the sale of illegal goods. Scrutiny of Chinese knock-offs is growing.
However, commodity-exporting Latin American countries have less leeway to act against Chinese interests because of their lopsided trade dynamic with Beijing, said Evan Ellis, a Latin America research professor at the US Army War College.
China’s “leverage comes from implicit threats often not to buy the commodities that are important or not to provide a loan,” Ellis said.
BACKLASH
At a time of geopolitical tension and rising trade tariffs, Beijing is not indifferent to the backlash. The Asian giant would need to walk a fine line between its pursuit of markets for its excess industrial capacity and managing how that trade policy affects the global south’s view of China, Myers said.
The backlash is spreading. In Mexico, the government has increased an import duty on small parcels from China and other countries with which it does not have trade agreements to 33.5 percent from a previous 19 percent. The higher levy is meant to shore up local factories and check the illegal resale of goods purchased over platforms such as Temu, Mexican Undersecretary of Industry and Commerce Vidal Llerenas said.
“Mexico could put more duties on goods if they are produced here or could be produced here,” Llerenas said in an interview.
The breadth of the commercial deluge was laid bare in recent raids across several states where the Mexican government confiscated Chinese goods, including toys and clothes copied from big brands, that it said dodged import taxes.
In Chile, a free-trade champion that sends most of its copper to China, imports less than US$41 that are tax exempt would be subject to the country’s 19 percent value-added tax (VAT) starting in October. Oil-exporting Ecuador in June began charging a US$20 fee per package under its US$1,600 per year duty-free courier regime.
In Uruguay, the government would propose charging VAT on international e-commerce purchases shipped from countries other than the US in its five-year budget bill, Uruguayan Minister of Finance Gabriel Oddone said on Wednesday last week.
TEMU GROWTH
Temu, a unit of PDD Holdings Inc, is incorporating local vendors to try to stave off such measures. This year the company opened its platform to domestic sellers in Mexico and stocks goods in local warehouses there and in Colombia, Chile and Peru to support businesses in the region, a company spokesperson said in an e-mail. SheIn declined to comment through an outside PR firm. AliExpress did not respond to a request for comment.
Uruguay-headquartered MercadoLibre, Latin America’s most valuable company with a market cap of US$118 billion, is hardly immune to scrutiny as it battles to defend its home turf. In Chile, for instance, the electricity and fuels regulator recently fined the firm for selling products like water heaters and power generators without safety certification.
MercadoLibre said in an e-mailed statement that its platform facilitates compliance with regulations in all Latin American countries where it operates.
The popularity of Chinese e-commerce lies in the steep discounts it offers compared with the exorbitant markups that Latin Americans are accustomed to paying for imported goods in local shops. Duties, tariffs and taxes mean a Ninja cordless blender retails for US$180 in Quito, as much as triple the price on Amazon delivered to the same destination. Temu offers a no-name version for less than US$13. A Gillette razor blade costs more than US$6.50 in a Montevideo supermarket. A Temu knock-off goes for US$0.25.
Catalina Moncayo, a medical auditor for a private health insurer in Quito, is a typical Temu fan.
“I received a package on June 30 that I’d ordered on June 6, and I was not billed any duty,” said Moncayo, who made her first order in August last year.
Such sentiments highlight the tension between consumers and local businesses that countries such as Chile are struggling to defuse.
The government’s move to tax courier parcels would only hurt cash-strapped consumers who already pay VAT on all other goods and services, said Hernan Calderon, president of Chilean consumer defense organization Conadecus.
E-commerce is “mostly for consumption by the same families who buy products that aren’t on the market or cost more in the local market,” he said.
As the e-commerce titans wrestle for market share in the region, even countries that already tax parcels from China are getting swamped.
In Colombia, companies shipping parcels from China frequently route them through the US to take advantage of a free-trade agreement or just ship them directly and pay the duties and taxes, said Lisandro Junco, the former head of the Colombian National Directorate of Taxes and Customs.
“In practice, a lot of these products are almost free and taxes are calculated on zero,” Junco said in an interview. “There are so many that control is impossible.”
LOGISTICAL CONSTRAINTS
At ports of entry, Latin America’s effort to police the parcel flow is often hampered by logistical constraints.
The Uruguayan National Customs Directorate has five people checking the paperwork and contents of Temu parcels at the international airport when at least 20 people are needed to reduce processing times currently measured in weeks, said Roberto Valdivieso, chairman of the union representing customs workers in Uruguay.
“It’s impossible for customs to provide good service when the human resources aren’t there. We at the union continue to demand that more workers be hired,” Valdivieso said.
Chile’s customs authority over the past few years has more than doubled the number of front-line staff controlling low-value parcels to about 40, said Alejandra Arriaza, director of the Uruguayan National Customs Directorate.
She doubts that charging VAT would dent parcel volumes.
“We don’t expect to see any drop,” she said. “The selection and price of products is still very attractive even charging VAT.”
For now, it is brick-and-mortar stores, especially in countries that do not tax courier parcels, that are struggling the most.
Sales at Andrea Tejera’s clothing and shoe store fell about 10 percent in the first half of this year after Temu became a buzzword last year in San Ramon, a city of about 8,000 people 80.5km north of Montevideo. Tejera purchased a bathroom fixture on Temu to better understand what she was up against.
“It arrived faster than my clothing supplier in Montevideo,” she said in a telephone interview. “People just keep buying more and more and more of everything that Temu offers with its aggressive marketing. It’s impossible not to get hooked on Temu.”
Many Uruguayans agree. Parcels entering the country under the US$600 annual duty-free allowance more than tripled to almost 1 million valued at about US$93 million in the first half of this year. About 37 percent of those parcels originated in Hong Kong, compared with just a couple hundred parcels a year ago, according to customs data.
The scale is also evident in Ecuador, which took in about 6.5 million duty-free parcels valued at about US$502 million last year, compared with 879,000 packages worth almost US$103 million in 2020, according to official data.
The Chilean National Chamber of Commerce, Services and Tourism said that it cannot determine whether Chinese e-commerce firms are selling products below cost.
However, their low prices are raising eyebrows, chamber head of studies Bernardita Silva said, adding that the chamber wants the government to step up supervision of parcels to reduce tax evasion and contraband.
“Unfair competition by international platforms is a matter of concern for retail members,” Silva said in an interview.
Temu in a statement said it “can offer competitive prices because of economies of scale and our streamlined supply chain, which removes middlemen markups and costs and passes on the savings to consumers.”
STATE SUBSIDIES?
In Uruguay, Herminio Castro is unconvinced.
The businessman paused plans to remodel some of the more than 40 clothing and footwear stores his firm Abiler operates across Uruguay because of a hit to sales he attributed to Temu. Castro, who imports goods from China, questions how Temu makes money offering free delivery of a US$15 product that probably costs US$25 to US$30 to ship.
“There is something wrong with that cost,” Castro said. “I don’t know if there is a subsidy or dumping.”
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS