India’s punishingly hot summer has cast a harsh light on its efforts to contend with extreme heat, with researchers and campaigners worried that local governments are failing to grapple with the scale and complexity of rising temperatures.
Summer, which usually lasts from March to June in India, began early this year with an unprecedented heat wave in February, followed by above-normal temperatures in March and April, before an early monsoon season and heavy rainfall brought temporary relief.
Heat Action Plans (HAPs), introduced in 2013, are India’s primary policy response to hotter temperatures that pose threats to public health, food security and outdoor workers.
However, a pair of recent studies showed that most Indian cities are still relying on low-cost fixes, while long-term measures remain underfunded, uncoordinated or entirely absent.
Local “governments are acknowledging heat as a problem,” said Aditya Valiathan Pillai, coauthor of an analysis of cities’ responses to extreme heat published by Sustainable Futures Collaborative (SFC) think tank in March.
“But they have no imagination of what long-term climate resilience even looks like,” he said.
More than half of Indian urban and rural districts, which are home to more 76 percent of the population, or more than 1 billion people, are now at high or very high risk from extreme heat, according to a May study by the Council on Energy, Environment and Water (CEEW), a New Delhi-based think tank.
PARTIAL MEASURES
The central government has encouraged local governments to adopt HAPs, with more than 250 cities and districts in 23 heat-prone states devising the plans, although it is not mandatory.
Nine-high risk cities, including New Delhi, Bhopal, Kolkata and Varanasi, that were surveyed by the SFC reported 150 heat-related measures between 2018 and 2023, but most were seasonal or after heat waves had struck, including setting up water stations, changing school schedules and issuing advisories.
Redesigning built environments and other long-term solutions were rare, and were focused on healthcare, like training hospital staff or tracking heat deaths, the SFC found.
Transformative steps such as erecting climate-sensitive housing were largely absent, the study said.
India’s densest and poorest areas are often excluded from cooling efforts tree-planting or water-body restoration because of land ownership and infrastructure challenges, Pillai said.
“You end up with greenery on the outskirts, not where it’s needed,” he said.
Selomi Garnaik, a campaigner with Greenpeace India, said many HAPs “lack targeted investments or meaningful shifts in infrastructure and governance.”
The plans were often created top-down with little community input, and heat is still viewed as mainly a health issue “when it actually intersects with labor rights, housing and urban planning,” she said.
The National Disaster Management Authority, as well as the agencies responsible for HAPs in Uttar Pradesh and Maharashtra states, did not respond to requests for comment. None of the city officials contacted by the Thomson Reuters Foundation agreed to an interview.
RISING HEAT
A study by Yale University in the US in 2023 found that 71 percent of nearly 11,000 Indians surveyed had experienced severe heatwaves in the previous year and 56 percent were “very worried” about heat as the climate changes.
Most of the respondents supported national action, like shifting to clean energy, rather than measures at the local level.
This might discourage local politicians from expending money and labor on longer-term strategies, Pillai said.
However, India has begun setting aside more money for heat.
Last year, heat waves were formally made eligible for project-based funding under the State Disaster Mitigation Fund, which has 320 billion rupees (US$3.65 billion) to cover disasters from 2021 to next year.
Accessing these monies remains limited, partly because the fund’s guidelines are still being finalized, said Vishwas Chitale, a climate resilience researcher at CEEW.
City planners must “treat heat like a long-term design problem, not just an emergency,” he said.
He pointed to Chennai, a city of 6.8 million people on India’s southeast coast, where officials used district-level heat-risk data to decide where to build parks and bodies of water as part of its 20-year city master plan.
However, experts said a holistic approach to deal with ever-rising temperatures in India is still missing.
“I am still waiting to see a city that does it all: short-term and long-term measures, legally backed, publicly engaged and fully implemented,” Pillai said.
In a summer of intense political maneuvering, Taiwanese, whose democratic vibrancy is a constant rebuke to Beijing’s authoritarianism, delivered a powerful verdict not on China, but on their own political leaders. Two high-profile recall campaigns, driven by the ruling party against its opposition, collapsed in failure. It was a clear signal that after months of bitter confrontation, the Taiwanese public is demanding a shift from perpetual campaign mode to the hard work of governing. For Washington and other world capitals, this is more than a distant political drama. The stability of Taiwan is vital, as it serves as a key player
Yesterday’s recall and referendum votes garnered mixed results for the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). All seven of the KMT lawmakers up for a recall survived the vote, and by a convincing margin of, on average, 35 percent agreeing versus 65 percent disagreeing. However, the referendum sponsored by the KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on restarting the operation of the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County failed. Despite three times more “yes” votes than “no,” voter turnout fell short of the threshold. The nation needs energy stability, especially with the complex international security situation and significant challenges regarding
Much like the first round on July 26, Saturday’s second wave of recall elections — this time targeting seven Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers — also failed. With all 31 KMT legislators who faced recall this summer secure in their posts, the mass recall campaign has come to an end. The outcome was unsurprising. Last month’s across-the-board defeats had already dealt a heavy blow to the morale of recall advocates and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), while bolstering the confidence of the KMT and its ally the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). It seemed a foregone conclusion that recalls would falter, as
The fallout from the mass recalls and the referendum on restarting the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant continues to monopolize the news. The general consensus is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has been bloodied and found wanting, and is in need of reflection and a course correction if it is to avoid electoral defeat. The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has not emerged unscathed, either, but has the opportunity of making a relatively clean break. That depends on who the party on Oct. 18 picks to replace outgoing KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫). What is certain is that, with the dust settling