When French President Emmanuel Macron rode a horse-drawn carriage to Windsor Castle on Tuesday, it marked the return of close political relations between London and Paris, drawing a line under the damaging spats of the Brexit years.
Macron’s office said the “shared interests” of the two countries were what mattered now, hailing France and the UK’s “essential” close relationship on the international stage.
This reinvigorated cross-Channel bond was “vital,” a UK official said.
Illustration: Mountain People
For Paris, it was symbolic that Macron is the first European leader to be invited for a pomp-filled state visit to the UK since Brexit. It was seen as a sign of the special France-UK relationship that Macron beat US President Donald Trump, who is to be hosted by King Charles III. Trump is expected to take his turn in a gilded carriage later this year.
The strong Franco-British unity on display is seen as crucial at a time of war in Ukraine and the Middle East, and faced with the unpredictability of the US president. London and Paris’ close bilateral ties on security and defense continued unhindered by Brexit, but are expected to be deepened and updated at Downing Street’s Franco-British summit this week, as the two countries lead the “coalition of the willing” on Ukraine.
For France, Macron’s state visit underlines how far British Prime Minister Keir Starmer has gone to move on from the nightmare chapter in cross-Channel relations of the Brexit years.
Former British prime minister Boris Johnson, who used his best franglais to say Paris should “donnez-moi un break,” was seen by French officials as a populist engaged in constant France-bashing to numb the electorate to the impact of Brexit. Trust and dialogue had ebbed away during bitter rows over submarine contracts with Australia and fishing rights.
Former British prime minister Lizz Truss, during her short-lived tenure, had deliberately refused to say whether Macron was a friend or a foe while running for the Conservative leadership.
Relations began to thaw under former British prime minister Rishi Sunak, assisted by King Charles’ state visit to France in 2023. The king dined at the Palace of Versailles, saying he loved Edith Piaf songs, because the French cabaret star had sung to his mother on a state visit when she was pregnant with him.
Macron and Starmer see each other unusually often. The British prime minister has traveled to France five times since his election, with Macron traveling several times in the other direction, as they work together on Ukraine.
“The geopolitical landscape has changed and made it more compelling for both sides to make up,” said Sebastien Maillard, a special adviser to the Jacques Delors Institute. “At a time of tremendous, almost earth-shattering movements in the international order, it’s a way for both countries — who are permanent members of the UN security council, have nuclear deterrents and the same level of diplomatic and military outreach — to cling to an order based on international law.”
Maillard said France and the UK’s renewed relationship, and putting Brexit aside, sent a signal to the Kremlin and the White House that they were like-minded and “there is no ideological warfare between them ... that core values and principles are deeply shared, and they are closely tied when it comes to defending Ukraine and the continent, and upgrading their military capabilities while increasing defense spending.”
However, a difficult issue remains on the table: the catastrophic deaths of would-be asylum seekers trying to reach the UK coast on small boats across the Channel from France.
Despite joint British funding and cooperation, and a French police presence on the coast, nearly 20,000 people have arrived in Britain via small boats so far this year, a 50 percent increase from the same period last year.
At least 17 people died this year trying to cross the Channel by boat, after a record 78 died last year. France is considering allowing police to stop British-bound boats in its shallow coastal waters up to 300m from the coast, but this requires a legal decision from sea authorities. Announcements are expected at this week’s summit.
“Both governments have to approach this as a domestic political issue, which makes the situation even more complex,” said Christian Lequesne, a professor of international relations at Paris’ Sciences Po university.
Starmer and Macron were in their own ways both under pressure at home from an increase in far-right and anti-immigration political discourse from Marine Le Pen and Nigel Farage, Lequesne said, adding that ultimately the newly warmed relationship better equipped the countries to find solutions.
“It took a long time, but France has finally digested Brexit, which it had a hard time swallowing and was disappointed about,” Lequesne said.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS