As things heated up in the Middle East in early June, some in the Pentagon resisted American involvement in the Israel-Iran war because it would divert American attention and resources from the real challenge: China. This was exactly wrong. Rather, bombing Iran was the best thing that could have happened for America’s Asia policy.
When it came to dealing with the Iranian nuclear program, “all options are on the table” had become an American mantra over the past two decades. But the more often US administration officials insisted that military force was in the cards, the less anyone believed it. After all, US governments spent decades insisting that North Korea would never be allowed to acquire nuclear weapons, but neglected to use force to avoid precisely that outcome.
Now, foreign powers will have to take Trump administration threats much more seriously. Not only has he proven he is willing to back up threats with action, but he has demonstrated notable risk tolerance as well. Israel’s ability to gain control of Iranian skies significantly mitigated those risks, but they were real nonetheless. The United States put fourteen airmen and seven of the most expensive airplanes in history over enemy territory, attacked a sovereign country with whom it was not in open warfare, employed weapons of war never before used in combat, and made little effort to secure political buy-in at home before acting. Much could have gone wrong.
The recent trade contretemps, in which Chinese reprisals succeeded in getting the Trump administration to the negotiating table, may have had China buying into Wall Street traders’ moniker for the US president: TACO, for “Trump Always Chickens Out.” Chinese leaders should be rethinking that assessment. Going forward, in a contest of wills in which American national security interests are in play, Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot assume Donald Trump will blink — a huge win for the president and for efforts to contain China.
Donald Trump has also put Chinese impotence on display. Beijing has invested significantly in Middle East relationships in recent years. Its oil and gas purchases, its first overseas military base (in Djibouti), its 2023 mediation of Iran-Saudi negotiations, and its 25-year security agreement with Tehran had many believing China was emerging as a major power in the Middle East. Beijing may have believed this itself.
Things look different now. China’s open support for Hamas did not hinder Israel in Gaza. As Israel methodically dismantled Iran’s air defenses and much of its nuclear program, Beijing didn’t lift a finger to support its purported regional ally. Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi (王毅) refused to even condemn Israeli actions in direct communications with Tel Aviv, even as he did so on calls with other capitals. And Xi could do little more than watch in awe as American B-2 bombers flew 18 hours to their target, spent 20 minutes over hostile territory, dropped 14 of the world’s largest-ever non-nuclear bombs on two underground nuclear facilities, and then flew home.
Put simply, China was helpless to prevent Israel from attacking its closest ally in the region, helpless in bringing the war to an end, and will likely be helpless in shaping the peace. Beijing has played no substantive role whatsoever in the region in recent weeks.
Middle powers and smaller countries that have aligned with China now know what that alignment is worth: not much, not when American national security is at stake. And capitals that have long sought to avoid taking sides in the US-China rivalry may be rethinking that approach. It must look pretty good to be on America’s side right now.
From here on, the Trump administration should feel more confident in dealing with China directly and in confronting China’s attempts to expand its influence around the world. And Beijing should feel less confident both in handling Trump and in its own ability to shape events beyond its borders.
China, a great power? More like a great bystander.
Michael Mazza is senior director for research at the Institute for Indo-Pacific Security (formerly the Project 2049 Institute) and a senior non-resident fellow at the Global Taiwan Institute.
KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) recent visit to Beijing and her upcoming visit to Washington will serve as a high-level test of her diplomatic mettle. In Beijing, Cheng was received with symbolic gestures, a warm reception, and high-level access. In Washington, she will receive far less pomp and far sharper questions about the KMT’s vision for the future of Taiwan. Her challenge will be to persuade Washington that the KMT’s engagement with China can coexist with strong deterrence. Cheng’s April 7-12 visit to mainland China coincided with an intense period of conflict in Iran. Despite the strategic significance of Cheng’s trip,
The closure of the Strait of Hormuz has sent the vast Asian chemicals industry into a tailspin. Deprived of the likes of Qatari natural gas and Saudi Arabian oil, the region’s fertilizer and plastics plants are slowing production or even shutting down. Everywhere except China, that is. In petrochemicals, China is unique. As well as a traditional industry that uses oil and gas as feedstock, it has parallel output that relies on its abundant domestic coal. Unsurprisingly, India and other regional powers want to copy and paste the Chinese method. This would not be easy — or climate friendly. The
Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto says he knows how to fix the problems facing Indonesia. Yet his economic mismanagement and authoritarian tendencies are steering the nation toward a familiar mix of currency instability and political chaos. The world’s fourth-most populous nation risks reversing the hard-won democratic and business reforms that came after the Asian Financial Crisis in 1997. At that time, the rupiah collapsed and the political upheaval that followed forced former president Haji Mohamed Suharto from power. Prabowo’s administration is ignoring similar warning signs. That disconnect was apparent in a national address on Wednesday, when Prabowo projected the swagger that has
“Of course you can choose not to be Taiwanese, just do not stay here,” chairwoman of Taipei 101 operator Taipei Financial Center Corp Janet Chia (賈永婕) said in an online interview with local entertainer Tai Chih-yuan (邰智源), triggering intense discussion on social media, with politicians across party lines weighing in. In the interview, which was aired on May 14, Chia and Tai’s discussion over a meal in Taipei 101 covered Chia’s career change from entertainer to chairwoman and US climber Alex Honnold’s free solo climb up the Taipei 101 building. During the interview, Chia said, “Being on this land, we
RSS