In an interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times (sister newspaper of the Taipei Times) Minister of Education Cheng Ying-yao (鄭英耀) on Wednesday said that international exchanges are a positive experience for students.
However, he did not encourage attending exchange programs in China.
“I don’t encourage elementary school, high school or even university-level students to only consider China for international exchanges,” he said.
As expected, pro-unification academics were furious, accusing Cheng of damaging and undermining cross-strait exchanges.
However, the public is aware that nearly all exchanges with China are viewed with suspicion, often seen as components of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) broader “united front” strategy. At the same time, the Chinese military continues to conduct military drills around Taiwan.
Is there another country that behaves so brazenly? How can any meaningful exchange occur between Taiwan and China under these circumstances?
Imagine you were to open a small shop, but shortly afterward, a thug turns up brandishing weapons and falsely claiming that your shop belongs to him.
One would hardly engage in cultural exchanges with the thug.
Since Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) took office, China has engaged in nonstop verbal and military intimidation of Taiwan. Only a delusional political party would support exchanges with the CCP. Even tourism to China is entirely unnecessary — why should Taiwanese spend their money in a country that is openly hostile toward them? Why should they help its domestic market?
Mutual respect, equality and reciprocity are foundational principles for all people and nations. The CCP has been vulgar and arrogant, and only fools would still be keen on exchanges with them.
Cheng should stand firm in arguing for what is right.
Teng Hon-yuan is an associate professor at Aletheia University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
The Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR) on Wednesday last week announced it is launching investigations into 16 US trading partners, including Taiwan, under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 to determine whether they have engaged in unfair trade practices, such as overproduction. A day later, the agency announced a separate Section 301 investigation into 60 economies based on the implementation of measures to prohibit the importation of goods produced with forced labor. Several of Taiwan’s main trading rivals — including China, Japan, South Korea and the EU — also made the US’ investigation list. The announcements come
Taiwan is not invited to the table. It never has been, but this year, with the Philippines holding the ASEAN chair, the question that matters is no longer who gets formally named, it is who becomes structurally indispensable. The “one China” formula continues to do its job. It sets the outer boundary of official diplomatic speech, and no one in the region has a serious interest in openly challenging it. However, beneath the surface, something is thickening. Trade corridors, digital infrastructure, artificial intelligence (AI) cooperation, supply chains, cross-border investment: The connective tissue between Taiwan and ASEAN is quietly and methodically growing
RSS