What is in a name? When it comes to a pope — everything. The white smoke from the Sistine Chapel told the world that a new pope to succeed Francis had been elected — and for the first time, the pontiff is from the US.
However, if US President Donald Trump and Vice President J.D. Vance, a Catholic convert, are ready to cheer, then they should think again. Cardinal Robert Prevost has chosen the name Leo XIV — and if you are a papal Leo, you tend to be a reformer at the progressive end of Catholicism.
That Prevost has decided to become Leo XIV would make Catholics think immediately of the previous Leo — Leo XIII — and his 1891 encyclical or teaching document, Rerum Novarum, which outlined workers’ rights to a fair wage, safe working conditions and the rights of workers to belong to trade unions. If Francis was the “people’s pope,” then Leo XIV is all set to be the workers’ pope.
Illustration: Yusha
The Catholic Church in the US is deeply divided. On the one hand, there are those who supported Trump in the last election and adhere to Vance’s view that there is an order of love which puts family first, then your neighborhood and far after that, the rest of humanity. Then there are those who agree with Francis that this is a misreading of Christianity — Leo XIV is likely to agree with his predecessor.
Prevost is an American with a difference: a cleric who has spent much of his life overseas. While born in Chicago, he joined the religious order, the Augustinians, then became one of their missionaries in Peru and was later made a bishop there by Francis. That experience would have given him an entirely different perspective on the Americas, and the US’ role in the world — an understanding of how Latin America can view its giant neighbor with suspicion, and how, for many Latin Americans, the church is about liberation, rather than toeing a rigid line of tradition.
For cardinals in the conclave pondering who the next leader of the Catholic Church should be, they would have considered leadership skills, pastoral experience, knowledge of the Vatican and toughness. Robert Prevost has all this in spades. He led his religious order as prior general, has worked in a diocese and since 2023 has been in charge of the Vatican department that chooses bishops. The view is that he has made having a compassionate or pastoral approach a priority for choosing who joins the episcopacy.
There would be some who would worry that Prevost blotted his copybook when it came to dealing with abuse crises in Peru. The sexual abuse of children and vulnerable people remains a stain on the Catholic Church, and how he handles it would be one of his great tests.
While some LGBTQ+ organizations said that, before Francis was elected, Prevost expressed concerns about what he called “the homosexual lifestyle,” it is noticeable that one of the Catholic Church’s leading advocates for gay people, the American Jesuit priest James Martin, has described Prevost’s election as “a brilliant choice,” and said that he is “kind, open and honest.”
There would be other challenges too: tackling the issues that the cardinals raised in their pre-conclave meetings, known as the general congregations. The 12 meetings threw up the need for a continuation of Francis’ ambitions for a church that gives lay people more say — known as synodality; that needs to continue to speak up for God’s creation at a time of environmental crisis; and that needs to continue to find a role for women in the church.
As pope, Francis appointed a few women to senior Vatican roles, but the dominance of men in the church was all too evident in the past couple of days, as the 133 male cardinal electors filed into the Sistine Chapel to vote for the leader of the world’s 1.4 billion Catholics.
However, if the cardinals were sure of one thing in their pre-conclave meetings, it was that the new pope must epitomize a pontifex — the old title for the pope, meaning a bridge. In his words from the balcony of St Peter’s Basilica, Leo XIV told the 40,000-strong crowd and the millions of Catholics watching around the world that: “We must be a church that builds bridges.”
The new pope only has to look to his native country of the US to see how damaging division can be — yet he would know how damaging division in the church is too. The workers’ pope must be a unity pope, too.
Catherine Pepinster is a former editor of the Tablet.
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS