As chair of the Taiwan European Parliament Amity Association, I must express my deep regret regarding the recent remarks made by the chairman of Taiwan’s largest opposition party, which, lacking any historical perspective, have seriously undermined relations between Taiwan and Europe.
When confronting history, what we need is humility, not political opportunism. The statements made by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) in no way represent Taiwan.
Europe is a crucial partner for Taiwan in the pursuit of democracy and human rights, and Germany, in particular, offers valuable lessons for Taiwan in the area of transitional justice. The irresponsible comments from the KMT must not be seen as the voice of Taiwan. I remain committed to promoting friendly exchanges between Taiwan and Europe, on the basis of our shared values.
With the diplomatic crisis created by the KMT, I believe the Ministry of Foreign Affairs must not remain silent. A strong statement defending Taiwan’s democratic and human rights values, as well as our international reputation, is needed.
Wu Pei-yi is a Democratic Progressive Party legislator and chair of the Taiwan European Parliament Amity Association.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS