On April 9, Taiwan established a Marine Pollution Control Fund committee. Seeing this news brought back memories of 2001, when the Amorgos — a Greek-registered freighter — ran aground near Kenting National Park in Pingtung County due to bad weather, causing an oil spill that severely damaged the coral reef ecosystem in the park’s Long Keng Ecological Reserve (龍坑生態保護區).
The incident sounded a major alarm for Taiwan’s ability to respond to marine oil pollution and began a new chapter in pollution prevention and control.
At that time, the Marine Pollution Control Act (海洋污染防治法) was still incomplete, and response mechanisms were slow to activate — as a result, the 1,150 tonnes of fuel oil remaining on the ship were not handled properly and contaminated the coastal reefs in the reserve. The cleanup ultimately took six months, mobilizing tens of thousands of people and coming at a very high cost.
The incident was not only an environmental catastrophe, but also a stress test of Taiwan’s governance, marine environmental protection measures and capabilities in international negotiations.
This painful experience catalyzed political and systemic reform. The Environmental Protection Administration (EPA) — which is now the Ministry of Environment — accelerated the establishment of supporting measures in the act. After the Ocean Affairs Council was established in 2018, the Ocean Conservation Administration (OCA) assumed the responsibility of tasks related to marine pollution prevention.
Amendments to the act were passed last year, which increased penalties for contravening it, established a dedicated Marine Pollution Control fund, introduced measures for rewarding people who report contraventions and aligned Taiwan’s regulations with international conventions, making the country’s legal framework more resilient.
However, immediately following these major revisions, Taiwan was faced with several intense typhoons. Last year, the OCA had to deal with the impact of Typhoon Gaemi, Super Typhoon Kong-rey and others, with 11 ships wrecked by the storms.
Each instance challenged Taiwan’s ability to handle large disasters, from rapid reporting, deployment of emergency equipment and satellite monitoring, to on-site command and post-disaster monitoring and restoration. Each stage of disaster response highlighted the importance of regulations and institutionalization, as well as the need for technological advancement.
The government’s success demonstrated its accumulated experience and development efforts that have persisted since the Amorgos incident.
Marine governance is related to more than environmental ecology — it is also closely linked to overall industrial risk management. As the effects of climate change worsen and extreme weather events occur with increased frequency, ship groundings and marine pollution are no longer anomalies.
For a country that relies heavily on shipping and exports, marine pollution is not merely an environmental issue — it is also a source of significant economic risk. Given the current global economic turmoil, industrial transformation and environmental risk management are inextricable.
The institutional experience accumulated after the Amorgos incident is a valuable asset for marine governance. As this year is the 24th anniversary of the incident, now is a time to reflect on the lessons learned and recognize new opportunities — marine oil pollution prevention is not just a cost, it is an investment toward mitigating risks, and even more so a necessary condition for industrial transformation and sustainable development.
Yang Lei is a retired professor and honorary president of the Taiwan Ocean Pollution Control Association.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
They did it again. For the whole world to see: an image of a Taiwan flag crushed by an industrial press, and the horrifying warning that “it’s closer than you think.” All with the seal of authenticity that only a reputable international media outlet can give. The Economist turned what looks like a pastiche of a poster for a grim horror movie into a truth everyone can digest, accept, and use to support exactly the opinion China wants you to have: It is over and done, Taiwan is doomed. Four years after inaccurately naming Taiwan the most dangerous place on
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
RSS