As US President Donald Trump’s tariff policies create uncertainty for the global economy and disrupt the established trade order, Taiwanese companies are focusing on what they can control — recalibrating their overseas expansion plans and accelerating internal innovation efforts to pursue new regenerative opportunities. Despite the challenges, there could be positive outcomes from the thorny issue of the tariffs.
Taiwan’s small and medium-sized semiconductor companies are following the lead of Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co in establishing smaller-scale production lines and sales offices in the US, not only to mitigate the effects of the tariffs, but also as an initial step to tap into the US market.
For local companies such as leading flat-panel display makers AUO Corp and Innolux Corp, a different strategy is being pursued to address tariff challenges. Both firms expect the impact of Trump’s tariffs to be limited, as the US accounts for only about 10 to 20 percent of their total sales, and most of their products are not directly exported to the US. To further rein in cost increases, some companies have adopted free-on-board (FOB) transaction terms to better manage the ever-changing import levies.
Rather than calculating the cost of establishing US-based manufacturing, AUO and Innolux have expressed no interest in expanding production to the US, citing high labor costs and thinner margins. Instead, they are focusing on their core strategies of shifting away from commodity flat-panel products and moving into higher-value-added segments, including next-generation display technologies such as microLED, which offer better cost-efficiency.
AUO is positioning itself as a total solutions provider, especially in auto intelligent cockpit operating systems, after acquiring Germany’s Behr-Hella Thermocontrol GmbH. It is also accelerating its overseas diversification, targeting untapped opportunities in Europe and Southeast Asia, where countries continue to support free trade. These efforts build on AUO’s manufacturing diversification into Vietnam, India, Europe and Mexico over the past few years.
Meanwhile, Innolux is expanding into the semiconductor sector, leveraging its panel-manufacturing know-how. The company expects to ship its first batch of chips using its panel-level packaging technology by the end of this year after several delays.
Taiwanese companies in traditional sectors such as machine tools, bicycles and textiles should take advantage of the current environment to shift away from heavy reliance on China’s market and its relatively low labor costs.
The nation’s major machine tool makers have paused shipments to the US as they negotiate with customers over how to share the tariff burden. Trump’s 32 percent “reciprocal” tariff, combined with a 10 percent levy on Taiwanese imports, is a sharp increase from the previous 4.7 percent, posing a severe challenge for companies whose average gross margins are only 20 to 25 percent.
The US is Taiwan’s second-largest export market for machine tools, accounting for 17.2 percent of total shipment value in the quarter ended March 31, behind China’s 26.8 percent, Taiwan Machine Tool and Accessory Builders’ Association data show. Facing the higher tariffs, some machine tool suppliers with lower exposure to the US market are considering withdrawing from it entirely and shifting their focus to European and Asian markets — a strategy also under consideration by local PC vendors.
Amid the evolving global tariff environment and trade landscape, local manufacturers are striving to navigate the challenges with agile operation and proactive decisionmaking to seize new business opportunities the trade-related changes present.
There is optimism that they can weather this difficult period, just as they did during the COVID-19 pandemic, provided that they take advantage of the current timing to expand globally, step by step.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
RSS