As countries across the globe grapple with how to respond to US President Donald Trump’s tariffs, the only country that seemed unperturbed is China, which vowed to “resolutely take countermeasures,” adding that it would fight to the end if the US side is bent on going down the wrong path. However, speaking at the White House on Tuesday, Trump appeared to soften his tone, signaling a willingness to ease the economic pressure after weeks of escalating tensions and retaliatory measures.
While it remains to be seen whether Trump would follow through, the main goal of the tariffs is to stifle China’s economic growth and hamper its military ambitions. If the endgame is China, why are other countries also being hit with “reciprocal” tariffs?
To undermine Beijing, the US needs to start with revitalizing its economy. For that, the US has found a few chinks in its armor, with manufacturing as a major soft spot. The latest data showed that China accounted for 31.6 percent of global manufacturing output, while the US accounted for 15.9 percent. That was a far cry from the peak years of the Rust Belt in the 1940s, when the US represented 30 percent of the world’s industrial output. To force manufacturing businesses back to the US, Trump has offered tax breaks to factories in the country.
On global trade, Trump is using tariffs as a bargaining chip to renegotiate for better trade deals. A case in point would be Vietnam, whose offer of zero tariffs on US imports was taken as “nothing,” because getting rid of tariffs on the US is just a start. Washington’s real aim is for target countries to remove non-tariff trade barriers, such as currency manipulation, technical regulations and other policies that could suppress US exports. Additionally, the countries that are facing the worst of the tariffs are major nations that China is using for illicit transshipments.
Trump might also offer a quid pro quo to lower the tariff as long as the target countries agree to raise tariffs on China. That would force countries playing both sides of the fence to take a stance. Right now, most countries cannot afford to lose the US market.
Coupled with the shift in the US’ defense strategy, Trump’s move would not seem so out of the blue if we take into account the trade war he launched against China during his first tenure. That lasted one year and a half before the two parties sat down to talk and sign a trade deal, in which China committed to purchase US$200 billion of additional US exports, totaling US$500 billion. China ended up buying only US$290 billion. For Trump, that result no doubt signals a failure, whereas from the Chinese point of view, it got away with it by stalling. Trump was voted out of office before it had to follow through with the deal.
China might play the long game again, as Trump is racing against time. The US midterm elections are scheduled to take place in November next year, so Trump has limited time to wield the tariff scythe. That is why he rolled out the policy in such a blunt, fast manner. Any Republican seats lost would result in further impediments to his plan.
For now, the two superpowers are locked in a game of chicken trade tariffs, each daring the other to blink first. For the US, the expected outcome is to force China to sign a new deal, reduce global trade deficits and partner with allies to isolate China as much as possible. The cherry on top would be for Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) to fall from power. Meanwhile, China would be seeking to run down the clock while wooing nearby East Asian partners to retaliate with higher tariffs on the US. It would also see the unraveling of US supremacy as desirable. By then, China would consider Taiwan a ripe fruit to pluck.
With the specter of Chinese aggression looming ever closer, Taiwan should always choose the most pragmatic solution by bolstering its military capabilities and strengthening unity. Taiwan must not sell itself short. Its semiconductor industry and democracy are strengths to be used for negotiation.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS