There is a spring in the step of EU officialdom these days — at least compared to the funereal mood a few months ago — as US President Donald Trump’s tariff war and attacks on rule-of-law push Europeans to huddle closer and investors to seek refuge in the euro. The question is just how far even the springiest step could go in achieving necessary change, with Germany facing a third straight year of stagnation and former Italian prime minister and European Central Bank president Mario Draghi’s warnings of slow agony still ringing in technocrats’ ears.
Trump’s frontal assault on the US$1.5 trillion transatlantic relationship has certainly done a better job of proving the EU’s worth than 1,000 white papers could. His attacks on NATO and Ukraine are boosting solidarity among members, with even traditionally pro-US Denmark shedding its euroskepticism in the wake of pressure over Greenland. The odds of Norway’s and Iceland’s membership are also shifting. Even the UK is moving closer to Brussels as the special relationship wilts.
As the EU’s single market of 440 million holds its own against Trump, member states are also more willing to break national taboos for the greater good. Germany’s new coalition is dragging the country out of austerity with a 500 billion euro-plus package (US$569 billion) for infrastructure and defense. It also delivered a recent mic-drop moment by pushing to ease EU fiscal rules it once championed. Meanwhile, France is willing to consider reshaping continental defense with an expanded nuclear deterrent, which appeals to Poland, as the US cozies up to Russia.
At a time when the tide of investment and research is turning to Europe’s benefit, it has become easier to big-up its stability, predictability and equality relative to the US.
“We have no bros and no oligarchs,” European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen said recently, as the executive body scrambles to unlock funding and other incentives to attract scientists shunned by the Trump administration.
The US dollar has shed about 9 percent of its value this year against a basket of world currencies, while the euro has strengthened by about 5 percent. Defense stocks like Rheinmetall AG have been on a tear.
Yet the EU still looks poorly prepared for the storm ahead. Its economy is twice as reliant on external trade as the US’, with Germany particularly vulnerable given its dependence on the US for more than 10 percent of its exports like autos and pharmaceuticals, according to Bloomberg Economics. The IMF’s latest projections see Germany’s output flatlining this year — and, considering the high uncertainty, there is a chance that Germany’s economy shrinks for the third straight year, according to ING economist Charlotte de Montpellier.
On top of the job losses and popular discontent a tariff war with Trump would bring, there is also a risk the EU finds itself waging a trade war on two fronts as China steps up its export engine and redirects a flood of goods to Europe.
The test of the coming summer of trade pain is not whether the EU could rush to seal a deal with Trump in 90 days, as LVMH’s billionaire boss Bernard Arnault seems to think. It is whether it starts to implement Draghi’s year-old recipe for success by bulking up fragmented domestic industries, creating a real single market for banks and integrating its disparate capital markets.
New markets and alliances abroad would help; yet, as IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva said, only the combination of more spending and more integration would lift growth and improve Europe’s resilience. Since it would take time to put new spending plans into action, perhaps it is not reassuring that the new German government’s policies still lack substance in areas like pensions or cutting red tape.
As good as Europe looks amid the US-led chaos, attracting talent and investment while blunting the appeal of populists at home would require a whole new level of unity.
“We cannot stop halfway,” European Central Bank President Christine Lagarde said earlier this month.
Her own institution is rising to the challenge of relaxing monetary policy to spur demand; it is high time governments started knocking down their own barriers to growth, which Draghi, Lagarde’s predecessor, equates to a 45 percent tariff on goods and a 110 percent levy on services.
If that means addressing another taboo — the need for more qualified majority voting among the 27 EU nations — so be it. It would be another welcome, if painful, jolt delivered by Trump’s antics.
Lionel Laurent is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist writing about the future of money and the future of Europe. Previously, he was a reporter for Reuters and Forbes. This column reflects the personal views of the author and does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) sits down with US President Donald Trump in Beijing on Thursday next week, Xi is unlikely to demand a dramatic public betrayal of Taiwan. He does not need to. Beijing’s preferred victory is smaller, quieter and in some ways far more dangerous: a subtle shift in American wording that appears technical, but carries major strategic meaning. The ask is simple: replace the longstanding US formulation that Washington “does not support Taiwan independence” with a harder one — that Washington “opposes” Taiwan independence. One word changes; a deterrence structure built over decades begins to shift.
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS