This year’s government budget has been significantly cut and frozen by opposition legislators, leading to administrative and operational difficulties and further contributing to the public’s dissatisfaction toward the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). Although many operational difficulties have already emerged across various government departments, the opposition continues to distort the truth, claiming that its cutting and withholding of the budget has had minimal impact on government agencies. As a result, some citizens have been misled into believing that the effects of the KMT’s budget cuts are being exaggerated, sowing discord among the public.
There are several examples of the KMT’s distorted messaging. The opposition says the overall budget still increased despite the cuts, but fails to mention how it deliberately cut some utility expenses and operational costs, along with prohibiting the reallocation of budget funds — all of which have caused difficulties for government agencies.
On Monday, Minister of Foreign Affairs Lin Chia-lung (林佳龍) confirmed that budget cuts and freezes have led to a limited supply of passports, and that the Bureau of Consular Affairs would not be able to print more passports by October. Yet somehow, the facts have been twisted: “If people already paid the NT$1,300 passport fee, how could there not be enough money to print more passports?” Such claims take advantage of the general public’s lack of understanding of the government’s budgeting systems, to spread disinformation.
Public budgets do not operate on a for-profit structure, nor are they responsible for their own financing, and they rarely balance revenues and expenditures. The NT$1,300 passport application fees go directly into the national treasury, while passport printing expenses are covered by the public budget. Thus, cuts to the public budget directly reduce the total number of passports that can be printed, which would naturally lead to a shortage. It is not a matter of whether the NT$1,300 passport application fee is enough to cover the cost of printing a passport, because that is simply not the way funds are allocated.
Addressing the shortage of passports — which is estimated to be about 150,000 to 200,000 this year — would inevitably require a budget increase in the future. However, what the public really wants to understand is, on what grounds did opposition legislators cut the budget to begin with? Why, without any factual basis, did the KMT resort to a blanket 10 percent cut, which affected the budget for printing passports?
This is why the public is dissatisfied with the KMT, and one of the main reasons so many citizens support the mass recall movement. It is not that the budget should not be cut — rather, it should not have been cut so frivolously, much less intentionally slashed to the point that government agencies struggle to function. Taxpayers elect legislators to adequately manage public funds on their behalf, not enact revenge against the government. Arbitrary budget cuts are by no means a way of tightening the purse strings — they are just spiteful vengeance.
Some people mistakenly believe that the funds from passport application fees can be directly used to print passports. Some media outlets have not only failed to correct the misinformation, but even fanned the flames by fueling its spread. These media outlets are not only contravening journalistic integrity and social responsibility, but have become accomplices in the spread of fake news.
Wang Chih-chien is a distinguished professor at National Taipei University’s Graduate Institute of Information Management.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which