If the People’s Republic of China (PRC) democratized and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan was still an authoritarian country, it would be understandable that members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — who supported the imposition of martial law by former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — changed their stance from being against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to supporting it, and opposed Taiwan being occupied and ruled by the ROC’s party-state system. After 1949, the KMT controlled the history of the ROC, which would mean the political progress made between 1945 and 2000 would become meaningless.
However, this is not the case. The PRC has not democratized. The global democratic front’s attempt to contain Russia by cooperating with China has failed. China and Russia remain the roots of an unstable global political order.
Going down a capitalist road, despite bolstering China’s economy to a certain extent, has not brought true happiness to the Chinese. The authoritarian regime has forced many to flee to free and democratic countries in Europe and the US.
The Tiananmen Square Massacre on June 4, 1989, confirmed that the PRC is anti-democratic. As the world’s factory, China has become a market economy, which does not sit well with its communist ideology. With its vast territory and huge population, China has become a capitalist country with the second-largest economy in the world. However, its domineering approach has raised concerns, which in turn has impeded its development.
In the late 1990s, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) promoted a “no haste, be patient” policy on investing in China. His advice was ignored by the business community, allowing China to become stronger economically and intensifying its threat against Taiwan. Now that the world has boycotted China for its ambition and its poor investment environment, Taiwan’s business community has gradually retreated from the Chinese market.
Following Taiwan’s democratization, the KMT no longer has the privileges it once had in the party-state era. Why would it expect something good from the PRC? Is it just because the Democratic Progressive Party is a rival and an enemy of the CCP? Does the KMT believe that an enemy’s enemy is a friend? Or does it wish to be exonerated from occupying Taiwan and being anti-CCP in the past?
If China was a democratic country that did not want to annex Taiwan, Taipei would be friendly to Beijing. Taiwan is one of the countries that are in the Han cultural sphere and writes using Chinese characters. It could have developed its own language, just as Japan and South Korea did.
Taiwan should build its own country in East Asia that is not subordinate to China. This is how the world should work, not the other way around — turning the world into a part of China. The Yuan Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty ruled China. Their territories were regarded as part of China. This is not the case for Japan, North Korea, South Korea and Taiwan.
If China was a normal country, an independent Taiwan could have diplomatic relations with it. Citizens of the two countries could have normal exchanges. The two countries would not have to bolster their invasive or defensive military capabilities. This would create peace and development opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region.
Before Chiang Kai-shek’s representatives were removed from the UN following the passage of UN Resolution 2758 in 1971, which recognized the PRC as “the only legitimate representatives of China in the UN,” intellectuals, who were waishengren (外省人) — mainlanders who fled to Taiwan with the KMT after the Chinese Civil War — had thought about preserving Taiwan by establishing a “Chinese Republic of Taiwan.” This historical event is worth reflecting on.
Some ROC citizens deliberately mix up the term “Chinese” with “PRC citizens” to create a confusing national identity. This is not just political, but also cultural. It contributes to the CCP’s ambition to annihilate the ROC. It does more harm than good to PRC citizens. It manifests the ugly side of these fence-sitters.
People in this country are “Taiwanese,” “Taiwanese of the ROC” and “ROC citizens.” Taiwan is to remain Taiwan until a consensus is reached, to avoid infringing on the rights of the PRC or being mixed up with it.
I look forward to constructive developments in Taiwan’s nationbuilding as democratization progresses. I also look forward to China putting an end to the CCP’s one-party dictatorship and developing into a democratic country.
However, it now looks like the Democratic Party in Hong Kong is to disband, putting an end to the territory’s road to democracy over the past 30 years. The democratization of China remains a distant hope.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Fion Khan
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
Taiwan’s long-term care system has fallen into a structural paradox. Staffing shortages have led to a situation in which almost 20 percent of the about 110,000 beds in the care system are vacant, but new patient admissions remain closed. Although the government’s “Long-term Care 3.0” program has increased subsidies and sought to integrate medical and elderly care systems, strict staff-to-patient ratios, a narrow labor pipeline and rising inflation-driven costs have left many small to medium-sized care centers struggling. With nearly 20,000 beds forced to remain empty as a consequence, the issue is not isolated management failures, but a far more
RSS