If the People’s Republic of China (PRC) democratized and the Republic of China (ROC) on Taiwan was still an authoritarian country, it would be understandable that members of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — who supported the imposition of martial law by former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — changed their stance from being against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to supporting it, and opposed Taiwan being occupied and ruled by the ROC’s party-state system. After 1949, the KMT controlled the history of the ROC, which would mean the political progress made between 1945 and 2000 would become meaningless.
However, this is not the case. The PRC has not democratized. The global democratic front’s attempt to contain Russia by cooperating with China has failed. China and Russia remain the roots of an unstable global political order.
Going down a capitalist road, despite bolstering China’s economy to a certain extent, has not brought true happiness to the Chinese. The authoritarian regime has forced many to flee to free and democratic countries in Europe and the US.
The Tiananmen Square Massacre on June 4, 1989, confirmed that the PRC is anti-democratic. As the world’s factory, China has become a market economy, which does not sit well with its communist ideology. With its vast territory and huge population, China has become a capitalist country with the second-largest economy in the world. However, its domineering approach has raised concerns, which in turn has impeded its development.
In the late 1990s, then-president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝) promoted a “no haste, be patient” policy on investing in China. His advice was ignored by the business community, allowing China to become stronger economically and intensifying its threat against Taiwan. Now that the world has boycotted China for its ambition and its poor investment environment, Taiwan’s business community has gradually retreated from the Chinese market.
Following Taiwan’s democratization, the KMT no longer has the privileges it once had in the party-state era. Why would it expect something good from the PRC? Is it just because the Democratic Progressive Party is a rival and an enemy of the CCP? Does the KMT believe that an enemy’s enemy is a friend? Or does it wish to be exonerated from occupying Taiwan and being anti-CCP in the past?
If China was a democratic country that did not want to annex Taiwan, Taipei would be friendly to Beijing. Taiwan is one of the countries that are in the Han cultural sphere and writes using Chinese characters. It could have developed its own language, just as Japan and South Korea did.
Taiwan should build its own country in East Asia that is not subordinate to China. This is how the world should work, not the other way around — turning the world into a part of China. The Yuan Dynasty and the Qing Dynasty ruled China. Their territories were regarded as part of China. This is not the case for Japan, North Korea, South Korea and Taiwan.
If China was a normal country, an independent Taiwan could have diplomatic relations with it. Citizens of the two countries could have normal exchanges. The two countries would not have to bolster their invasive or defensive military capabilities. This would create peace and development opportunities in the Asia-Pacific region.
Before Chiang Kai-shek’s representatives were removed from the UN following the passage of UN Resolution 2758 in 1971, which recognized the PRC as “the only legitimate representatives of China in the UN,” intellectuals, who were waishengren (外省人) — mainlanders who fled to Taiwan with the KMT after the Chinese Civil War — had thought about preserving Taiwan by establishing a “Chinese Republic of Taiwan.” This historical event is worth reflecting on.
Some ROC citizens deliberately mix up the term “Chinese” with “PRC citizens” to create a confusing national identity. This is not just political, but also cultural. It contributes to the CCP’s ambition to annihilate the ROC. It does more harm than good to PRC citizens. It manifests the ugly side of these fence-sitters.
People in this country are “Taiwanese,” “Taiwanese of the ROC” and “ROC citizens.” Taiwan is to remain Taiwan until a consensus is reached, to avoid infringing on the rights of the PRC or being mixed up with it.
I look forward to constructive developments in Taiwan’s nationbuilding as democratization progresses. I also look forward to China putting an end to the CCP’s one-party dictatorship and developing into a democratic country.
However, it now looks like the Democratic Party in Hong Kong is to disband, putting an end to the territory’s road to democracy over the past 30 years. The democratization of China remains a distant hope.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Fion Khan
On Sept. 3 in Tiananmen Square, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) rolled out a parade of new weapons in PLA service that threaten Taiwan — some of that Taiwan is addressing with added and new military investments and some of which it cannot, having to rely on the initiative of allies like the United States. The CCP’s goal of replacing US leadership on the global stage was advanced by the military parade, but also by China hosting in Tianjin an August 31-Sept. 1 summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO), which since 2001 has specialized
In an article published by the Harvard Kennedy School, renowned historian of modern China Rana Mitter used a structured question-and-answer format to deepen the understanding of the relationship between Taiwan and China. Mitter highlights the differences between the repressive and authoritarian People’s Republic of China and the vibrant democracy that exists in Taiwan, saying that Taiwan and China “have had an interconnected relationship that has been both close and contentious at times.” However, his description of the history — before and after 1945 — contains significant flaws. First, he writes that “Taiwan was always broadly regarded by the imperial dynasties of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) will stop at nothing to weaken Taiwan’s sovereignty, going as far as to create complete falsehoods. That the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has never ruled Taiwan is an objective fact. To refute this, Beijing has tried to assert “jurisdiction” over Taiwan, pointing to its military exercises around the nation as “proof.” That is an outright lie: If the PRC had jurisdiction over Taiwan, it could simply have issued decrees. Instead, it needs to perform a show of force around the nation to demonstrate its fantasy. Its actions prove the exact opposite of its assertions. A
A large part of the discourse about Taiwan as a sovereign, independent nation has centered on conventions of international law and international agreements between outside powers — such as between the US, UK, Russia, the Republic of China (ROC) and Japan at the end of World War II, and between the US and the People’s Republic of China (PRC) since recognition of the PRC as the sole representative of China at the UN. Internationally, the narrative on the PRC and Taiwan has changed considerably since the days of the first term of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) of the Democratic
RSS