The sentencing of opponents and other public figures to as much as 66 years in prison highlights the Tunisian president’s dismantling of political achievements.
Tunisia was not just the birthplace of the Arab Spring. In 2021, a decade after the movement swept across the region, it remained a flickering, yet precious beacon of democracy when other nations had swiftly fallen into chaos or authoritarianism. Tunisian President Kais Saied in July 2021 staged a self-coup and reversed most of his nation’s progress, dismantling institutions and snatching away his compatriots’ hard-won civil liberties.
Following his re-election last year — in a contest from which all significant opposition had been removed, and on a historically low turnout — he has redoubled his efforts. Civil society, business, the judiciary and the media, as well as political opponents, have all felt the pain, but it has not stopped with them. Last year, officials from the Tunisian Swimming Federation were arrested for plotting against state security over their failure to display the national flag at a competition.
Human Rights Watch last week said in a new report that arbitrary detention has become a cornerstone of the government’s repression, and that multiple detainees face the death penalty in cases relating to their public statements or political activities. It was published as a court sentenced opposition politicians, former officials and other prominent Tunisian figures to up to 66 years in jail following a mass trial.
The trumped-up conspiracy case (in which some defendants are still to be sentenced) includes charges such as plotting against the state and membership of a terrorist group. One of the many tried in absentia was the French intellectual Bernard-Henri Levy, who was reportedly handed 33 years.
The verdicts were never in much doubt. Saied in 2023 said that the accused politicians were “traitors and terrorists,” and that judges who acquitted them would be accomplices. The defendants included key figures from Ennahda, the largest opposition party — its cofounder, 83-year-old Rached Ghannouchi, was sentenced to 22 years in prison in a separate case in February. As if to ram home the message of the conspiracy case, the leading defense lawyer Ahmed Souab was arrested after calling proceedings a farce.
Western democratic partners of Tunisia have been strikingly and shamefully muted as Saied’s campaign of repression has unfolded. When ethnic violence and evictions followed his xenophobic and cynical attacks on undocumented migrants from sub-Saharan Africa two years ago — blaming them for the nation’s economic woes — relations remained cosy.
For the EU and the UK, the president’s willingness to control migrant flows has mattered far more than his crushing of domestic democratic impulses. The European Commission earlier this month proposed including Tunisia on a new EU list of safe nations of origin — allowing member states to speed up processing of asylum claims from those nations on the basis that they are unlikely to be successful. The court verdicts last week are just another reminder of why they should not.
Saied’s paranoia underscores the truth that he is not invincible. The failure to match material progress to democratic advances fueled his rise, but the nation’s economic travails have deepened under him. There is reportedly growing discomfort about his rule in military and governmental circles. Nonetheless, there is immense personal risk in speaking out. That makes it all the more admirable that some Tunisians are still willing to do so. They should not be left to defend what little remains of their democratic dream alone.
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
Taiwan is confronting escalating threats from its behemoth neighbor. Last month, the Chinese People’s Liberation Army conducted live-fire drills in the East China Sea, practicing blockades and precision strikes on simulated targets, while its escalating cyberattacks targeting government, financial and telecommunication systems threaten to disrupt Taiwan’s digital infrastructure. The mounting geopolitical pressure underscores Taiwan’s need to strengthen its defense capabilities to deter possible aggression and improve civilian preparedness. The consequences of inadequate preparation have been made all too clear by the tragic situation in Ukraine. Taiwan can build on its successful COVID-19 response, marked by effective planning and execution, to enhance
Since taking office, US President Donald Trump has upheld the core goals of “making America safer, stronger, and more prosperous,” fully implementing an “America first” policy. Countries have responded cautiously to the fresh style and rapid pace of the new Trump administration. The US has prioritized reindustrialization, building a stronger US role in the Indo-Pacific, and countering China’s malicious influence. This has created a high degree of alignment between the interests of Taiwan and the US in security, economics, technology and other spheres. Taiwan must properly understand the Trump administration’s intentions and coordinate, connect and correspond with US strategic goals.
RSS