Defense from within
Ryan Hass’ analysis (“External uncertainty should concentrate minds on domestic compromises,” April 14, page 8) offers a sober and clear-eyed view of the political uncertainties facing Taiwan in this new era of US foreign policy improvisation. His call for domestic compromise within Taiwan could not be more timely. Yet, this is precisely where the real challenge lies.
The greatest threat to Taiwan today might not be China’s growing military power alone — it is Taiwan’s inability to unite in the face of it. Hass urges all parties in Taiwan to compromise on how urgent and serious the threat from China is. However, that assumes a shared reality exists. The uncomfortable truth is that to certain opposition politicians in Taiwan, China is not a threat — it is a business partner, a benefactor or quite possibly their next boss, assuming they are not already on the payroll.
As long as such figures remain influential, unrestrained and politically active, Taiwan’s ability to present a unified front in defiance of China would remain crippled. That is the core of the problem — and the most formidable task ahead for President William Lai (賴清德). Enforcing the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) more stringently is not about political witch-hunting; it is about national survival. Likewise, the ongoing recall campaign must be seen not merely as a political exercise, but as the public’s effort to defend democracy against those who would compromise it from within.
As Hass rightly points out, Trump’s transactional worldview means that Taiwan can no longer rely on abstract appeals to shared values. The era of strategic ambiguity from the US is morphing into one of strategic volatility. Taiwan must adapt — not just externally, but internally. Only a united Taiwan could credibly manage the “dual dependency” relationship with the US, and only a united Taiwan could resist Beijing’s strategy of exploiting division.
In short, before Taiwan can defend its sovereignty from external threats, it must first defend it from within.
John Cheng
Taichung
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
RSS