With the US’ commitment to upholding its European allies’ security in serious doubt, and revisionist powers like China and Russia increasingly emboldened, the EU is scrambling to strengthen its capacity to defend itself. However, this effort could be thwarted by a fundamental paradox: While Europeans cherish peace, they largely lack the resolve to fight for it.
A recent report highlights the scale of this disconnect. Although half of young people in France, Germany and Spain, as well as the UK, expect armed conflict within a decade, only one-third would fight to defend their countries. Across the EU, only 32 percent of adults say they would be willing to take up arms, including just 23 percent of Germans and 14 percent of Italians.
The problem is not simply that Europeans have embraced pacifism. Rather, the EU is beset by a dangerous complacency: Decades of reliance on the US have fostered a widespread belief that security is guaranteed, not earned. However, US President Donald Trump’s administration has made it clear that Europe can no longer count on the US to defend it. With security threats proliferating — exemplified by Russia’s war in Ukraine and China’s saber-rattling in the Indo-Pacific region — Europe must cultivate a collective will to fight.
Illustration: Yusha
If this effort is to safeguard, and even strengthen, European democracies, it must be rooted not in aggressive nationalism — which creates fertile ground for anti-democratic forces to thrive — but in a sense of civic duty and economic pragmatism. This is not about militarizing society, but about empowering it to defend itself, thereby upholding the freedom, stability and prosperity that Europeans so value.
The first step is for Europe to rethink its approach to military engagement. Conscription, while effective in Scandinavia or the Baltics, will not work in every European context. Instead, governments should introduce flexible, accessible military-training programs — think short-term courses on cybersecurity, drone operation or survival skills — that double as pathways to employment.
With some countries, such as Sweden and Spain, having 25 percent of youth unemployed or underemployed, linking military service to certifications in high-demand fields like engineering or logistics could enhance its appeal substantially, particularly to voters who value upward mobility.
Such initiatives should also capitalize on the interests of young Europeans, not least their enthusiasm for military-themed video games that resemble war simulations. Pilot programs in Estonia, where cyberdefense training has bolstered both security and tech employment, offer a useful model.
Fostering sustained support for increased military spending — including for the European Commission’s welcome initiative to unlock trillions of euros that are sitting idle in savings accounts — will require a similar reframing. The traditional “guns versus butter” framework, which pits security against social-welfare spending, is not only alienating; it is also wrong. Far from eroding Europe’s economic well-being, investment in defense would bolster a powerful engine of growth and prosperity.
The EU’s defense sector already employs more than 500,000 people and generates at least 150 billion euros (US$171 billion) annually. The success of companies like Germany’s Rheinmetall, whose stock price has doubled since the beginning of the year, shows just how profitable security investments can be.
However, changing the narrative about military spending will require more than communicating facts; policies that directly link defense to people’s social and economic well-being are essential. For example, governments could introduce subsidies for military families or tax breaks for defense-sector workers.
Moreover, innovative financial instruments — such as “national freedom bonds” (with guaranteed returns) or an exchange-traded fund for European defense (with similar guarantees) — could mobilize domestic capital, while giving citizens a greater stake in their own security while earning some profit. France’s social bonds and Italy’s tax-advantaged savings instruments show how this can work. Applying this model of profitable patriotism to defense could raise billions of euros.
All of this will require political leadership, with Europe’s mainstream parties championing military preparedness not as a show of aggression, but as a bulwark for freedom and the rule of law in open societies. Unfortunately, European liberals are still clinging to the “anti-politics” mindset once championed by the likes of the late Czech dissident-turned-president Vaclav Havel.
While this approach was appropriate in the fight against communism, it is hampering Europe’s ability to confront the threats of today, while enabling populists who flirt with appeasement to gain ground. Public figures, educators, and the media must also contribute to fostering the necessary shift in mindset.
Europe’s security landscape is changing fast. To navigate it effectively, the EU must integrate defense into a broader pro-democracy agenda in which military service is a practical, appealing option for young people, defense spending is linked to economic well-being, and political leaders make a compelling case for military preparedness. Without such a push, the world’s revisionist powers would increasingly dictate the terms of engagement, and the vision of a peaceful, stable and united Europe would fade into history.
Wojciech Przybylski, editor of Visegrad Insight and president of the Res Publica Foundation in Warsaw, is an advisory board member at the LSE IDEAS Ratiu Forum and the European Forum for New Ideas, and a Europe’s futures fellow at the Institute for Human Sciences. Goran Buldioski is a senior fellow at the Hertie School in Berlin.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS