The export landscape for Taiwan is expected to change drastically after US President Donald Trump’s “reciprocal” tariffs take effect tomorrow. That is because Trump is to impose higher-than-expected levies on Taiwan and China, and hefty tariffs on countries under local firms’ “China Plus One” investment strategy — especially ASEAN members. That would include countries such as Cambodia, Indonesia, Myanmar, Thailand and Vietnam, making it difficult for Taiwanese businesses to continue sourcing intermediate goods from those nations, assembling them into final products and shipping them to the US.
Taiwanese exporters expected ASEAN members to become the new pathway to the US market, following the tariffs Trump imposed during his first term, which were primarily targeted at imports from China. As a result, Taiwanese businesses — from electronics and textiles to footwear, furnishing and auto parts — avoided an overconcentration on China, diversifying their supply chain risks and reducing production costs. However, as the new tariffs are more significant and broader than projected, such expectations have quickly diminished.
Taiwan’s exports last year rose 9.9 percent year-on-year to US$475.07 billion, the second-highest ever, with shipments to the US reaching a record US$111.4 billion and those to ASEAN members hitting a record US$87.8 billion, Ministry of Finance data showed. While China and Hong Kong remained the leading destination for Taiwan’s exports and accounted for 31.7 percent of the nation’s total outbound shipments last year, their share fell to the lowest level in 23 years. In contrast, exports to the US comprised 23.4 percent of the total last year, the second-highest destination, and those to ASEAN members accounted for 18.5 percent, the third-highest.
The calculation for the tariffs is questionable and unimaginable. It was based on the levies required to balance US trade deficits, rather than reflecting their tariff rate differentials, value-added taxes, currency exchange rates or other non-tariff trade barriers, as initially anticipated. It is Trump’s tactic to force countries to negotiate with the US on ways to reduce trade deficits and direct more manufacturing to the country.
The brutal reality is that the US is imposing massive tariffs on countries that Chinese companies use as bases to rebadge products to evade US tariffs. No matter where firms set up factories abroad, there is nowhere to hide from US levies. If the tariffs remain unchanged following trade negotiations with Washington, it would inevitably have a direct effect on Taiwan’s exports to the US and an indirect impact on shipments to Southeast Asian countries, which would require Taipei to adjust its foreign trade strategies and companies to rethink overseas production.
Broadly speaking, Trump’s tariffs would likely spike US inflation and hamper the country’s economic growth. It would also have negative implications for Asian economies’ growth this year and beyond. However, Taiwan is particularly vulnerable, given its high exposure to the US market and the high 32 percent tariff, as well as the rise in local firms’ investments in emerging nations in Southeast Asia and overall exports contributing 60 percent or more to Taiwan’s GDP.
As government agencies assess the tariff’s effects on domestic industries and prepare relief programs for affected businesses, Taipei must seek to negotiate with Washington to bring down the duties or limit their scope, although it might take some time and require a complex process to achieve any acceptable outcomes. In the meantime, policymakers should consider expanding purchases of US energy, agricultural products and aircraft, adjusting Taiwan’s import tariff structure and removing non-tariff barriers to address the “unbalanced” Taiwan-US trade. Over the long term, Taiwan must accelerate its industrial upgrades and market diversification.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS