In the late 19th century, US cities were dark. Gas lamps flickered in homes and along streets, while coal-fired engines powered industry and steam propelled trains. Then the race to electrify the country began — a fierce competition between Thomas Edison, Nikola Tesla and George Westinghouse that ultimately redefined modern life. Today, we stand on the cusp of a similarly momentous energy transformation, powered by fusion energy. However, this time it is a competition between countries, not innovators, that would make all the difference.
Electrification did not happen overnight, nor was it inevitable. It was made possible by a mix of private innovation, government investment and national ambition. Once the US committed to it, the process became unstoppable. As factories, businesses and homes were electrified, a new era of US dominance dawned.
Likewise, the race to harness fusion energy is not only about scientific discovery; it is about who would dominate the future of energy. If the US leads, fusion power plants could provide abundant, clean and safe energy for generations of Americans, breaking the country’s dependence on fossil fuels and insulating it from global energy shocks. If the US fails to meet this moment, it would find itself buying fusion machines from China, just as it now imports Chinese solar panels, electric-vehicle (EV) batteries and rare-earth minerals.
Fusion — when two light atoms fuse to form a new, heavier atom, releasing a huge amount of energy — moved to the forefront of the global energy transition only recently. For decades, it was viewed as a grand but remote scientific ambition. While researchers made slow but steady progress in replicating the reactions that power the sun and stars, harnessing them to produce limitless, carbon-free power seemed to be a distant dream.
An inflection point came in 2022, when scientists at Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory’s National Ignition Facility achieved a controlled fusion reaction that produced more energy than it consumed, proving that fusion power is theoretically possible and within reach. Now, researchers are doing more than running experiments; they are laying the groundwork for real power-generation systems.
The race to harness fusion energy would be decided not by physics, but by engineering, infrastructure and industrial capacity. The first country to bring fusion power to the grid, not the first to achieve fusion reactions in a lab, would decide how the world’s next great power source is deployed and dominate a potential multi-trillion-dollar industry, reshaping its own economy in the process.
There was a time when the US set the pace for every major technological revolution. It built the first light bulbs, the first airplanes, the first computers and put a man on the moon, but it is China that is moving aggressively to win the fusion race, investing heavily in research and development, and positioning itself to control the supply chains that would enable large-scale fusion deployment. Chinese laboratories have already set records in sustaining fusion reactions, and state-backed initiatives are seeking to secure control over tritium, one of the fuels that would power future reactors. The US is falling behind.
We have seen this pattern before — first with solar panels, then with batteries and now with EVs. In each case, US innovation laid the foundation for new industries, but it was China that implemented a long-term strategy aimed at cementing its dominance over manufacturing and supply chains. In each case, the US ended up dependent on foreign production.
When it comes to fusion, the stakes are even higher. The ability to generate near-limitless energy would amount to a strategic advantage rivaling the greatest breakthroughs of the twentieth century. Beyond acquiring powerful economic leverage over the US, a China that leads in fusion would gain considerable geopolitical clout. If China also leads in artificial intelligence, quantum computing and advanced manufacturing — as it is positioning itself to do — its influence would be unmatched.
US policymakers are well aware of the risks a dominant China would pose, as reflected in recent national security strategies, and economic and foreign policies. They also know that energy independence is critical to US security; it has been a priority for decades. However, they have yet to recognize the critical importance of leading on fusion. This must change — and fast.
Harnessing fusion energy is not a challenge for the next presidential administration or even the next US Congress. The decisions the US makes in the next five years would determine whether it wins the fusion race — or watches others run away with the prize.
Ylli Bajraktari, a former chief of staff to the US National Security Adviser and a former executive director of the US National Security Commission on Artificial Intelligence, is CEO of the Special Competitive Studies Project.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS