Chinese outdoor furniture maker Jin Chaofeng set up a factory in Vietnam in July last year to escape higher US tariffs. Now he is looking to close it, as Washington imposes steep levies on Hanoi and the rest of the world.
“I’ve done all this work for nothing,” Jin said, adding that foreign trade would become a “very thin-margin” business, just like the demand-starved Chinese market.
No other country comes close to matching China’s annual sales of more than US$400 billion in goods to the US each year. US President Donald Trump just hiked tariffs by an extra 34 percentage points on those goods.
Illustration: Tania Chou
His world-wide tariffs strike at the core of Chinese exporters’ two main strategies to blunt the impact of trade war: moving some production abroad and increasing sales to non-US markets.
The sweeping tariffs could deal a lasting blow to global demand. China is more exposed to the risk of shrinking world commerce than any other nation, with economic growth last year relying heavily on running a trillion-dollar trade surplus.
Kaiyuan Securities (開源證券) expects the new tariffs could slash Chinese exports to the US by 30 percent, cut overall exports by more than 4.5 percent and drag economic growth by 1.3 percentage points.
“It’s an all-round blockade against China,” said Yuan Yuwei (袁玉瑋), hedge fund manager at Water Wisdom Asset Management, who said he was bullish on gold and shorting China and Hong Kong stocks as a result.
Ahead of Trump’s re-election in November last year, many Chinese manufacturers were already relocating some production facilities to Southeast Asia and other regions.
Now their new factories face tariffs of 46 percent in Vietnam, 36 percent in Thailand and at least 10 percent anywhere else. As Trump raised tariffs on China by 20 percentage points in February and last month, the global salesforce of its manufacturers was in a rat race for new export markets in Asia, Latin America and elsewhere.
Now these economies are taking their own tariff hit, probably reducing their purchasing power, and demand for Chinese goods. Analysts say Washington’s new measures are the type of punch and clinch on Beijing that could derail China’s economic growth and its efforts to fight deflation.
“This will make it impossible for the 5 percent growth target to be achieved,” said Zhiwu Chen (陳志武), a finance professor at HKU Business School.
“China cannot get out of this deflationary situation anytime soon. This new tariff increase is definitely making things worse,” he said, adding that the external demand shock is feeding back internally, as producers are under pressure to cut costs.
Jerry Jiao, whose factory in China makes cast-iron bathtubs, said he had already “laid off some employees, reduced management costs, and cut down on various expenses” this year.
Li Zhaolong, the manager of a clothing factory in the southern city of Guangzhou, said he needed to rely more on domestic orders, but worried about subdued demand.
“You had one cake for one person before, but now five people want to eat it,” Li said.
In 2023, about 145 countries traded more with China than with the US, an increase of nearly 50 percent from 2008, according to research by investment bank Jefferies.
That is a measure of China’s success over decades in developing competitive industries under a world trade order the US created, but which it now considers unfair and a threat to its own security.
“We still need to diversify our export markets, support exports and encourage businesses to focus more on domestic sales,” said a Chinese trade policy adviser who spoke on condition of anonymity.
“The risk of a global recession is real,” he added. “If everyone submits, the United States will indeed profit, as if others are paying tribute. But if they resist and retaliate continuously, the US economy won’t be able to handle it.”
For China, the other risk is that more of its trade partners would see its exporters competing ever more heavily on price in their markets and throw up trade barriers of their own to protect domestic industries.
“That is true both in Europe and many emerging market economies,” S&P Global’s chief Asia economist Louis Kuijs said.
Domestic factors also add challenges to any Chinese plan to double down on foreign trade.
Many analysts say China’s exporting prowess is also the result of government policies that disadvantaged households, leading to imbalances such as manufacturing overcapacity, slow domestic consumption, and roads and bridges built to nowhere.
China’s “mercantilism has led to financial repression, offering households low returns on savings to create cheap finance for favored industries,” said Shamik Dhar, senior adviser at Fathom Consulting.
“This has fueled rapid economic growth but also capital misallocation, property speculation, and financial sector fragility,” he said.
Analysts expect Beijing to announce more stimulus measures soon. The measures could range from central bank interest rate cuts and liquidity injections to exporter tax rebates, property market support, and perhaps even higher budget deficit and debt issuance than flagged at the annual parliament meeting last month.
Last month’s “restrained” stimulus measures “were a calculation, not an oversight,” said Ruby Osman, China expert at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. “Beijing has purposefully kept more in reserve.”
A second policy adviser said cutting the funds banks are required to hold as reserves and reducing lending rates should be a priority for the second quarter, while more fiscal stimulus might come in the third.
“Without this Plan B, it is unlikely for China to reach the roughly 5 percent growth target this year,” the adviser said. “What’s more, the finance ministry should prepare Plan C if Trump further hikes tariffs against China.”
However, key to mitigating growth and deflationary risks is what policies Beijing has in store to boost consumption, analysts said.
China has been pledging for more than a decade to shift its economic model away from investments and towards consumption-led growth. In parliament, its leaders made those promises even more loudly, without unveiling significant structural measures.
Global trade disruption makes those even more urgent, analysts said, although hopes for major structural reform remain low, in view of how painful that transition is likely to be.
Subsidies for consumer goods purchases and more support for childcare are possible, but broader welfare reform and radical changes to the tax system, land liberalization and other policies to redirect resources to households from the state sector remain unlikely.
“We’ll likely see a doubling down on efforts to encourage domestic demand as a way to offset this expected shock to external demand,” said Nick Marro, principal economist for Asia and lead for global trade at the Economist Intelligence Unit. “But there’s only so much the Chinese government can do.”
There are moments in history when America has turned its back on its principles and withdrawn from past commitments in service of higher goals. For example, US-Soviet Cold War competition compelled America to make a range of deals with unsavory and undemocratic figures across Latin America and Africa in service of geostrategic aims. The United States overlooked mass atrocities against the Bengali population in modern-day Bangladesh in the early 1970s in service of its tilt toward Pakistan, a relationship the Nixon administration deemed critical to its larger aims in developing relations with China. Then, of course, America switched diplomatic recognition
The international women’s soccer match between Taiwan and New Zealand at the Kaohsiung Nanzih Football Stadium, scheduled for Tuesday last week, was canceled at the last minute amid safety concerns over poor field conditions raised by the visiting team. The Football Ferns, as New Zealand’s women’s soccer team are known, had arrived in Taiwan one week earlier to prepare and soon raised their concerns. Efforts were made to improve the field, but the replacement patches of grass could not grow fast enough. The Football Ferns canceled the closed-door training match and then days later, the main event against Team Taiwan. The safety
The National Immigration Agency on Tuesday said it had notified some naturalized citizens from China that they still had to renounce their People’s Republic of China (PRC) citizenship. They must provide proof that they have canceled their household registration in China within three months of the receipt of the notice. If they do not, the agency said it would cancel their household registration in Taiwan. Chinese are required to give up their PRC citizenship and household registration to become Republic of China (ROC) nationals, Mainland Affairs Council Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) said. He was referring to Article 9-1 of the Act
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
RSS