Chinese outdoor furniture maker Jin Chaofeng set up a factory in Vietnam in July last year to escape higher US tariffs. Now he is looking to close it, as Washington imposes steep levies on Hanoi and the rest of the world.
“I’ve done all this work for nothing,” Jin said, adding that foreign trade would become a “very thin-margin” business, just like the demand-starved Chinese market.
No other country comes close to matching China’s annual sales of more than US$400 billion in goods to the US each year. US President Donald Trump just hiked tariffs by an extra 34 percentage points on those goods.
Illustration: Tania Chou
His world-wide tariffs strike at the core of Chinese exporters’ two main strategies to blunt the impact of trade war: moving some production abroad and increasing sales to non-US markets.
The sweeping tariffs could deal a lasting blow to global demand. China is more exposed to the risk of shrinking world commerce than any other nation, with economic growth last year relying heavily on running a trillion-dollar trade surplus.
Kaiyuan Securities (開源證券) expects the new tariffs could slash Chinese exports to the US by 30 percent, cut overall exports by more than 4.5 percent and drag economic growth by 1.3 percentage points.
“It’s an all-round blockade against China,” said Yuan Yuwei (袁玉瑋), hedge fund manager at Water Wisdom Asset Management, who said he was bullish on gold and shorting China and Hong Kong stocks as a result.
Ahead of Trump’s re-election in November last year, many Chinese manufacturers were already relocating some production facilities to Southeast Asia and other regions.
Now their new factories face tariffs of 46 percent in Vietnam, 36 percent in Thailand and at least 10 percent anywhere else. As Trump raised tariffs on China by 20 percentage points in February and last month, the global salesforce of its manufacturers was in a rat race for new export markets in Asia, Latin America and elsewhere.
Now these economies are taking their own tariff hit, probably reducing their purchasing power, and demand for Chinese goods. Analysts say Washington’s new measures are the type of punch and clinch on Beijing that could derail China’s economic growth and its efforts to fight deflation.
“This will make it impossible for the 5 percent growth target to be achieved,” said Zhiwu Chen (陳志武), a finance professor at HKU Business School.
“China cannot get out of this deflationary situation anytime soon. This new tariff increase is definitely making things worse,” he said, adding that the external demand shock is feeding back internally, as producers are under pressure to cut costs.
Jerry Jiao, whose factory in China makes cast-iron bathtubs, said he had already “laid off some employees, reduced management costs, and cut down on various expenses” this year.
Li Zhaolong, the manager of a clothing factory in the southern city of Guangzhou, said he needed to rely more on domestic orders, but worried about subdued demand.
“You had one cake for one person before, but now five people want to eat it,” Li said.
In 2023, about 145 countries traded more with China than with the US, an increase of nearly 50 percent from 2008, according to research by investment bank Jefferies.
That is a measure of China’s success over decades in developing competitive industries under a world trade order the US created, but which it now considers unfair and a threat to its own security.
“We still need to diversify our export markets, support exports and encourage businesses to focus more on domestic sales,” said a Chinese trade policy adviser who spoke on condition of anonymity.
“The risk of a global recession is real,” he added. “If everyone submits, the United States will indeed profit, as if others are paying tribute. But if they resist and retaliate continuously, the US economy won’t be able to handle it.”
For China, the other risk is that more of its trade partners would see its exporters competing ever more heavily on price in their markets and throw up trade barriers of their own to protect domestic industries.
“That is true both in Europe and many emerging market economies,” S&P Global’s chief Asia economist Louis Kuijs said.
Domestic factors also add challenges to any Chinese plan to double down on foreign trade.
Many analysts say China’s exporting prowess is also the result of government policies that disadvantaged households, leading to imbalances such as manufacturing overcapacity, slow domestic consumption, and roads and bridges built to nowhere.
China’s “mercantilism has led to financial repression, offering households low returns on savings to create cheap finance for favored industries,” said Shamik Dhar, senior adviser at Fathom Consulting.
“This has fueled rapid economic growth but also capital misallocation, property speculation, and financial sector fragility,” he said.
Analysts expect Beijing to announce more stimulus measures soon. The measures could range from central bank interest rate cuts and liquidity injections to exporter tax rebates, property market support, and perhaps even higher budget deficit and debt issuance than flagged at the annual parliament meeting last month.
Last month’s “restrained” stimulus measures “were a calculation, not an oversight,” said Ruby Osman, China expert at the Tony Blair Institute for Global Change. “Beijing has purposefully kept more in reserve.”
A second policy adviser said cutting the funds banks are required to hold as reserves and reducing lending rates should be a priority for the second quarter, while more fiscal stimulus might come in the third.
“Without this Plan B, it is unlikely for China to reach the roughly 5 percent growth target this year,” the adviser said. “What’s more, the finance ministry should prepare Plan C if Trump further hikes tariffs against China.”
However, key to mitigating growth and deflationary risks is what policies Beijing has in store to boost consumption, analysts said.
China has been pledging for more than a decade to shift its economic model away from investments and towards consumption-led growth. In parliament, its leaders made those promises even more loudly, without unveiling significant structural measures.
Global trade disruption makes those even more urgent, analysts said, although hopes for major structural reform remain low, in view of how painful that transition is likely to be.
Subsidies for consumer goods purchases and more support for childcare are possible, but broader welfare reform and radical changes to the tax system, land liberalization and other policies to redirect resources to households from the state sector remain unlikely.
“We’ll likely see a doubling down on efforts to encourage domestic demand as a way to offset this expected shock to external demand,” said Nick Marro, principal economist for Asia and lead for global trade at the Economist Intelligence Unit. “But there’s only so much the Chinese government can do.”
Many local news media over the past week have reported on Internet personality Holger Chen’s (陳之漢) first visit to China between Tuesday last week and yesterday, as remarks he made during a live stream have sparked wide discussions and strong criticism across the Taiwan Strait. Chen, better known as Kuan Chang (館長), is a former gang member turned fitness celebrity and businessman. He is known for his live streams, which are full of foul-mouthed and hypermasculine commentary. He had previously spoken out against the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and criticized Taiwanese who “enjoy the freedom in Taiwan, but want China’s money”
A high-school student surnamed Yang (楊) gained admissions to several prestigious medical schools recently. However, when Yang shared his “learning portfolio” on social media, he was caught exaggerating and even falsifying content, and his admissions were revoked. Now he has to take the “advanced subjects test” scheduled for next month. With his outstanding performance in the general scholastic ability test (GSAT), Yang successfully gained admissions to five prestigious medical schools. However, his university dreams have now been frustrated by the “flaws” in his learning portfolio. This is a wake-up call not only for students, but also teachers. Yang did make a big
As former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) concludes his fourth visit to China since leaving office, Taiwan finds itself once again trapped in a familiar cycle of political theater. The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has criticized Ma’s participation in the Straits Forum as “dancing with Beijing,” while the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) defends it as an act of constitutional diplomacy. Both sides miss a crucial point: The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world. The disagreement reduces Taiwan’s
Former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) is visiting China, where he is addressed in a few ways, but never as a former president. On Sunday, he attended the Straits Forum in Xiamen, not as a former president of Taiwan, but as a former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chairman. There, he met with Chinese People’s Political Consultative Conference Chairman Wang Huning (王滬寧). Presumably, Wang at least would have been aware that Ma had once been president, and yet he did not mention that fact, referring to him only as “Mr Ma Ying-jeou.” Perhaps the apparent oversight was not intended to convey a lack of
RSS