Days ago, foreign media reported that Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Eastern Theater Command Director Lin Xiangyang (林向陽) is suspected to have disappeared under suspicious circumstances. The Eastern Theater Command is the core military department responsible for operations against Taiwan — the purging of its director, if true, would be a major blow to the morale of the Chinese military and the success of its training.
On Tuesday morning — April Fool’s Day — the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) Eastern Theater Command suddenly announced the launch of joint military exercises in the air and maritime spaces surrounding Taiwan. The exercises involved army, navy, air and rocket forces, and aimed to create a stress test on Taiwan in the form of sudden military drills. Beijing’s goal was to use surprise attacks to intimidate Taiwan and create strategic panic, thereby weakening the reaction time and rhythm of preparation of our military.
The CCP evidently underestimated our military’s alertness and combat readiness mechanisms. In response to the CCP’s military exercise tactics, Taiwan has already established a “rapid response exercise” system, where emergency responses are simulated across potential combat zones to effectively guard against the CCP’s sudden military drills. As a result, this round of CCP military exercises failed at its goal of disrupting Taiwan’s defense rhythm, once again confirming the comprehensiveness of our military’s combat preparedness, as well as its command and communications systems.
The shadow of Lin’s disappearance turned these seemingly significant, high-profile military exercises into nothing but mindless drills launched in what appears to be an attempt to cover up internal strife. Not only did the PLA fail to display its strength, but it also exposed internal chaos and attracted international ridicule.
The CCP’s tired strategy of using military exercises to intimidate Taiwan is no longer effective. The more pressure it applies, the more it alerts Taiwanese society and worsens resentment against the CCP. These military threats only serve to galvanize Taiwan’s determination to defend itself and strengthen the push for international democratic cooperation. On April Fool’s Day, what the CCP gave to Taiwan was not deterrent military force, but a foolish act that led to diplomatic losses and the worsening of public opinion.
Elliot Yao is a reviewer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS