US health agency leadership and policymakers seem intent on undermining trust in messenger RNA (mRNA), the technology that saved millions of lives during the COVID-19 pandemic and has shown promise in addressing a range of infectious diseases and even cancer.
One troubling sign of the trend came when, according to Kaiser Family Foundation reporting, National Institutes of Health officials told academic researchers to remove any mention of mRNA vaccine technology from their grant applications. The directive dovetails with weak or misleading messaging from public health agencies on the value of vaccines and proposed state legislation that would ban mRNA shots.
All of this is sending public health in the wrong direction, whether because people eschew today’s COVID-19 vaccine or refuse to take whatever mRNA shots are developed to address a future pandemic — if those vaccines are developed at all. The current environment puts at risk momentum for critical prevention and treatments.
“What this is doing is quite literally putting partisan politics in front of a cure for cancer,” said Matthew Motta, assistant professor of Health Law, Policy and Management at Boston University’s School of Public Health.
“It’s really sad that this is going to impact people’s lives in a very tangible way, not only by taking away care that they have access to, but deprive them of something they could have access to one day,” he said.
The mRNA technology took decades to develop. It was painstaking work supported by the US National Institutes of Health (NIH) and ultimately recognized with the 2023 Nobel Prize in medicine. The goal is no different than that of a conventional vaccine — to expose the immune system to key components of a bad actor, whether a virus or a cancer mutation, so it learns how to shut it down the next time it appears.
Here is what an mRNA vaccine does not do: integrate into or interact with our DNA, cause infertility, contain microchips or cause people to “shed” the vaccine.
Yet those claims have persisted — and not just from random people pushing conspiracy theories on social media. Government officials have also pushed the false theories. A 2021 analysis by the Center for Countering Digital Hate identified US Secretary of Health and Human Services (HHS) Robert F. Kennedy Jr as one of the most prominent spreaders of disinformation about the COVID-19 vaccine. Kennedy lobbied to get the vaccine pulled from the market in mid-2021 and later called it “the deadliest vaccine ever made.”
He has not publicly repeated his wilder claims about COVID-19 vaccines since US President Donald Trump appointed him to the HHS job. However, he questioned their use in children during his US Senate confirmation hearings, and the agencies he oversees are signaling a distrust in mRNA.
In addition to the potential cuts to funding supporting research on mRNA, NIH has terminated dozens of grants related to studying vaccine hesitancy, some of which centered on the COVID-19 vaccines. Meanwhile, HHS is weighing pulling a US$590 million contract awarded to Moderna to use its technology to develop bird flu shots.
Defunding or de-emphasizing research into mRNA and related vaccine hesitancy is deeply concerning. The suppression of scientific inquiry into an area of study that has already saved millions of lives and has the potential to be one of humanity’s best defenses against future pandemics puts all of us in harm’s way.
This means we might be unable to pivot quickly to technology that can be rapidly deployed in an emergency. We also could be stifling research that could make mRNA better. Our COVID-19 vaccines do a great job of keeping people out of the hospital and from dying, but we should continue to look for shots that prevent infection, are more potent or can be made more cheaply.
The early promise the technology has shown in cancer is enough to warrant a full-court press. Biotech firms such as Moderna and BioNTech might take on some of the work, but academic partners funded by the NIH have been critical to the foundational science underpinning those companies’ work.
The scarier scenario is that we might find ourselves in an increasingly dangerous feedback loop around mRNA and vaccination, where distrust fomented by health agencies breeds anti-vaccine laws reinforcing that distrust. “If some people think vaccines are unsafe and ought not to be mandated, then our policymakers who are concerned about being reelected ... have an incentive to follow through on it,” Motta said.
Motta’s research has shown that they already are. Since Trump took office, multiple states have introduced legislation — some defeated, some pending — targeting mRNA vaccines. Policymakers in Idaho, Iowa and Montana attempted to ban mRNA vaccines altogether (the measure in Montana ultimately failed). Florida Governor Ron DeSantis this month said he would seek to ban mRNA vaccine mandates permanently.
All of these actions by state and federal leaders do not just set up barriers, but feed mistrust around mRNA that could affect attitudes about the safety and value of all shots, whether for COVID, bird flu or other diseases. That is sending science backward and would ultimately be harmful to Americans.
Lisa Jarvis is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering biotech, healthcare and the pharmaceutical industry. Previously, she was executive editor of Chemical & Engineering News. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
With the Year of the Snake reaching its conclusion on Monday next week, now is an opportune moment to reflect on the past year — a year marked by institutional strain and national resilience. For Taiwan, the Year of the Snake was a composite of political friction, economic momentum, social unease and strategic consolidation. In the political sphere, it was defined less by legislative productivity and more by partisan confrontation. The mass recall movement sought to remove 31 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators following the passage of controversial bills that expanded legislative powers and imposed sweeping budget cuts. While the effort
There is a story in India about a boy called Prahlad who was an ardent worshipper of Lord Narayana, whom his father considered an enemy. His son’s devotion vexed the father to the extent that he asked his sister, Holika, who could not be burned by fire, to sit with the boy in her lap and burn him to death. Prahlad knew about this evil plan, but sat in his aunt’s lap anyway. His faith won, as he remained unscathed by the fire, while his aunt was devoured by the flames. In some small way, Prahlad reminds me of Taiwan
When Hong Kong’s High Court sentenced newspaper owner Jimmy Lai (黎智英) to 20 years in prison this week, officials declared that his “heinous crimes” had long poisoned society and that his punishment represented justice restored. In their telling, Lai is the mastermind of Hong Kong’s unrest — the architect of a vast conspiracy that manipulated an otherwise contented population into defiance. They imply that removing him would lead to the return of stability. It is a politically convenient narrative — and a profoundly false one. Lai did not radicalize Hong Kong. He belonged to the same generation that fled from the Chinese
To our readers: Due to the Lunar New Year holiday, from Sunday, Feb. 15, through Sunday, Feb. 22, the Taipei Times will have a reduced format without our regular editorials and opinion pieces. From Mondy to Thursday the paper will not be delivered to subscribers, but will be available for purchase at convenience stores. Subscribers will receive the editions they missed once normal distribution resumes on Friday, Feb. 20. The paper returns to its usual format on Monday, Feb. 23, when our regular editorials and opinion pieces will also be resumed.
RSS