Gen Z has been in the workforce just long enough to want out. Well, at least temporarily. The concept of a micro-retirement has started to trend (again) on social media, which makes it seem as if an entire generation of 20-somethings wants to take an adult gap year.
Is that a rebranding of the more well-known sabbatical? Yes, with a couple of noteworthy caveats: Micro-retirement is not employer-granted — say goodbye to pay while you are away or a guaranteed job upon return — and it is meant to be more of a routine lifestyle choice to combat burnout and pursue personal passions.
However, it is not Gen Z that should be fixating on micro-retirement; it is companies.
Illustration: Mountain People
Employers can and should offer those sorts of breaks to their employees as a workplace benefit, especially if working remotely is no longer an option. Offering access to an employer-granted micro-retirement, which sounds far chicer than “sabbatical,” is one more set of golden handcuffs. It is a perk akin to an employer-matched 401(k) — restricted stock units with a suboptimal vesting schedule or the ultimate golden handcuffs: health insurance. Asking businesses to adopt workplace changes inspired by the whims of the youth can seem impractical and create the cliche “kids these days” response from older employees and bosses, but they should remember that the practice is not necessarily a new phenomenon.
Everything from what people wear to what is a socially acceptable way to speak to a subordinate to the demographics of the office was shifted by young employees over the decades. Gen Z just happens to broadcast their strategies, such as “quiet quitting” or “lazy girl jobs,” on social media, which can often make the ideas feel like passing trends.
However, before micro-retirement is dismissed outright, consider what companies are up against. Businesses should be focused on retention, especially with 18 percent and 36 percent of the workforce now made up of two generations — Gen Z and millennials respectively — that have demonstrated they have no qualms with quitting and job hopping.
It can cost tens of thousands of dollars to replace an employee. First, there is the recruiting process and lost productivity that comes with it, including the managers and employees taking time to interview prospective replacements. It also often takes an increase in pay to attract quality talent to the now-empty position, especially if the previous employee was around for several years. Then there is having to train talent, which can still result in lost productivity until the new hire is fully onboarded and up to speed on the role.
Salary.com estimates that replacing an employee can cost between half and twice their salary.
On the other side, micro-retirement could be treated like an employee going on parental leave and work could be distributed amongst colleagues. Perhaps it could be a benefit that is unlocked after three years at a company, can last up to four weeks at a time and eligibility renews every three years. However a company chooses to implement it, the advantage is that it is a perk available to everyone, which might lower any animosity that coworkers sometimes have toward those going out on parental leave.
If you are wondering if the concept of a sabbatical truly needed to be rebranded, perhaps it does. The newer term might represent more than just a catchy phrase for its users. Sabbaticals have usually been tied to academia. Taking one often includes research or bettering skill sets to return more useful for an employer. However, the term micro-retirement embodies the idea of a complete break from work to indulge in life while you are younger and presumably healthier.
The indulgence does not have to be a swoon-worthy vacation to splash all over social media, either. It could be as simple as having the gift of focused, uninterrupted time to spend with loved ones.
That is the sort of break that sounds enticing to younger workers when they start crunching some numbers.
According to the US Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, life expectancy in the US has fallen in recent years to about 80 years for women and just shy of 75 for men. A 2023 Gallup poll showed that the mean age that non-retirees anticipate retiring is 66 years old.
Having less than 15 years to enjoy leisure time after more than 40 years in the workforce is pitiful, particularly in a country where, according to a 2023 Pew Research Center study, 4 in 10 workers fail to take their full allotment of vacation days. The US Bureau of Labor Statistics reported the average private sector worker receives 11 vacation days after one year of employment, and it only goes up to 18 days after 10 years.
Even with that grim outlook, the likelihood of companies rapidly coming around to offering micro-retirements is slim, which is why anyone who wants to take one would have to continue to work toward funding their own time off. That is so long as the prospect of finding another job or figuring out a backup plan for health insurance would not cast a pall on the micro-retirement movement.
I have dealt with burnout more than once in my career — both when I was traditionally employed (and working a side hustle) and as a self-employed millennial. The latter status allowed me the flexibility to take a three-month break, but worrying about losing out on opportunities was hard to shake. I suspect Gen Z might need a little bit of practice to overcome this part: I had to be confident and disciplined enough to decline work opportunities for three months, fully get off social media, and focus on pleasure and creativity to alleviate the burnout.
It was not a magical cure-all, but the distance from the rut of routine sparked new ideas and clarified changes I needed to make in my business and life.
Erin Lowry is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering personal finance. She is the author of the three-part Broke Millennial series.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
Xiaomi Corp founder Lei Jun (雷軍) on May 22 made a high-profile announcement, giving online viewers a sneak peek at the company’s first 3-nanometer mobile processor — the Xring O1 chip — and saying it is a breakthrough in China’s chip design history. Although Xiaomi might be capable of designing chips, it lacks the ability to manufacture them. No matter how beautifully planned the blueprints are, if they cannot be mass-produced, they are nothing more than drawings on paper. The truth is that China’s chipmaking efforts are still heavily reliant on the free world — particularly on Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing
Last week, Nvidia chief executive officer Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) unveiled the location of Nvidia’s new Taipei headquarters and announced plans to build the world’s first large-scale artificial intelligence (AI) supercomputer in Taiwan. In Taipei, Huang’s announcement was welcomed as a milestone for Taiwan’s tech industry. However, beneath the excitement lies a significant question: Can Taiwan’s electricity infrastructure, especially its renewable energy supply, keep up with growing demand from AI chipmaking? Despite its leadership in digital hardware, Taiwan lags behind in renewable energy adoption. Moreover, the electricity grid is already experiencing supply shortages. As Taiwan’s role in AI manufacturing expands, it is critical that
RSS