When the Cabinet requested a reconsideration of the central government general budget approved by the legislature, the legislature inexplicably demanded that the executive branch cut the budget itself by NT$6.36 billion (US$192.7 million). Opposition lawmakers’ actions have led to criticism of their “contravening principles of responsible governance.”
Not only are they reneging on their obligation to review the budget, they are harming the normal and stable operation of government agencies, and undermining the democratic government’s balance of powers.
The legislature is abandoning its obligation to conduct reviews and infringing on responsible governance.
Budgetary reviews are a core job component for legislators to ensure that government spending aligns with national development needs and upholds fiscal discipline.
In principle, the legislature should carefully review each ministry’s budget and decide whether to cut or adjust it. However, instead of conducting substantial deliberations, it told the Executive Yuan to cut NT$6.36 billion from the budget itself, essentially handing its responsibility to review spending to the executive branch and its ministries and agencies.
Such an abrogation of duty goes against the fundamental principles of responsible governance: The legislature must exercise supervisory powers pertaining to the budget and should not shift this and other duties onto other branches of the government, or demand that the executive branch review budgetary items and decide what stays and what goes.
Specifically, the legislature did not clearly enumerate the items it intends to cut or adjust; it instead demanded that the executive branch cut its proposed expenditure to meet the figure set by the legislature, leaving the executive branch in a tough position.
If ministries and agencies lack concrete direction in implementing the budget, this could lead to plans being halted due to insufficient funding, or to partial reductions in services and personnel due to budget shortfalls. This indeterminacy impacts the effectiveness of governance and harms the quality of public services.
This is not the first time the legislature has tried to pass its responsibilities to the executive branch, but is a long-standing abuse of budgetary review duties. Some opposition lawmakers are using “budget freezes” and demands that the Executive Yuan cut the budget itself to deepen political conflict and block implementation of government policy instead of carrying out precise budget adjustments through reasoned and rational deliberation. Their actions have the veneer of supervision, but the reality is that they are causing ministries to take on an unreasonable burden, further impacting the stability of government operations.
The legislature’s use of simplistic reductions of the budget without looking at actual items is a political propaganda tool. It has abandoned the professional spirit of budgetary reviews.
The legislature’s demand that the executive branch itself reduce the budget not only contravenes principles of responsible governance, but threatens the stable operations of government agencies.
The legislature should replace political manipulations with substantive reviews to make budget reviews a foundation that buttress government operations, not a tool for destabilization.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at National Taiwan Normal University and chairman of the Central Taiwan Association of University Professors.
Translated by Tim Smith
In the first year of his second term, US President Donald Trump continued to shake the foundations of the liberal international order to realize his “America first” policy. However, amid an atmosphere of uncertainty and unpredictability, the Trump administration brought some clarity to its policy toward Taiwan. As expected, bilateral trade emerged as a major priority for the new Trump administration. To secure a favorable trade deal with Taiwan, it adopted a two-pronged strategy: First, Trump accused Taiwan of “stealing” chip business from the US, indicating that if Taipei did not address Washington’s concerns in this strategic sector, it could revisit its Taiwan
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
RSS