When I was 14, I was looking for a video on the most popular file-sharing app of the time — Limewire — and started a download.
The video that arrived did not match the description. What I saw instead is as vivid in my mind today as it was in the seconds after I had shut it off, reacting too slowly to miss the horror of a young woman’s murder. That is the sort of thing that could happen in those days, when the Internet was a true Wild West. It was the risk you took when you used those kinds of services.
There should be no such danger for people who use Instagram.
Illustration: Yusha
Yet on Thursday last week, reports circulated — in 404 Media, the Wall Street Journal and elsewhere — of an “error” on the app that pushed videos of extreme violence and death into their feeds, nestled between their usual serving of friends and influencers.
Feeds started to take a dark turn on Wednesday, the Wall Street Journal reported. Those affected are thought to include minors.
Some of the videos were presented with a “sensitive content” warning that requires a user to tap before the clip is revealed. However, many of them did not — they just automatically started to play.
Reading through comments from unsuspecting users, I was reminded of my 14-year-old self and the lingering effects of a violent video you were not expecting or emotionally prepared for.
“I watched 10 people die today,” one user told the Wall Street Journal.
“I feel like I lost some humanity today,” another wrote on Reddit, saying it caused sleeplessness.
Meta Platforms Inc, Instagram’s parent, has apologized.
“We have fixed an error that caused some users to see content in their Instagram Reels feed that should not have been recommended,” a spokesman said. The company declined to share how many people were involved. Chatter online suggests it is far from an isolated incident.
Affected users need to hold Meta to account. Never before has there been such a clear-cut case of the company’s algorithm actively working to traumatize its users. What caused this error? What steps would be taken to make sure it does not happen again? Would anyone be held responsible? Meta would not voluntarily say.
One question for Meta might be why that content was on Instagram at all, shared on pages with names such as “BlackPeopleBeingHurt.”
Late last year, more than 140 Kenya-based content moderators working for Meta were diagnosed with post-traumatic stress disorder — the result of endless hours of sifting through traumatic material, doctors said. Mercifully, what Instagram users saw on Wednesday (and perhaps Thursday) was just a tiny reflection of the harrowing job those workers do for up to 10 hours a day. However, take it from me, it takes only one clip to sear into your brain for a lifetime.
The company insisted that the error was unrelated to its recently announced changes to its moderation policies. Last month, it said it would stop removing some content that would have previously been prohibited, although it has not provided a full updated breakdown of what is now considered acceptable.
It said it would use fewer automated processes to remove harmful material, instead relying on user reports.
Meta CEO Mark Zuckerberg conceded it would mean the company would “catch less bad stuff.”
Meta’s existing policy on violent material is that even the most disturbing scenes are permitted on the platform. Footage of human “dismemberment” and displaying “innards” are fine if given a warning label. So, too, are images and video of “burned or charred” people and “throat slitting.” However, Meta’s staff would remove such content at the request of a family member — which is mighty good of them.
It is unfortunate, and not Meta’s fault, that there exists an eager audience for such videos, known colloquially on the Internet as “gore.” Other social networks have contended with the issue, too. Reddit, for instance, took steps to remove forums such as “WatchPeopleDie.” However, in those cases, those who wanted such material had to go actively looking. This is different: a catastrophic failure for a company that billions trust to shield them from this harm.
What does it do to young minds to see extreme violence on their Instagram feeds? Meta’s apology does not cut it.
Dave Lee is Bloomberg Opinion’s US technology columnist. He was previously a correspondent for the Financial Times and BBC News.
The US Senate’s passage of the 2026 National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA), which urges Taiwan’s inclusion in the Rim of the Pacific (RIMPAC) exercise and allocates US$1 billion in military aid, marks yet another milestone in Washington’s growing support for Taipei. On paper, it reflects the steadiness of US commitment, but beneath this show of solidarity lies contradiction. While the US Congress builds a stable, bipartisan architecture of deterrence, US President Donald Trump repeatedly undercuts it through erratic decisions and transactional diplomacy. This dissonance not only weakens the US’ credibility abroad — it also fractures public trust within Taiwan. For decades,
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences
RSS