Two US military vessels, the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer the USS Ralph Johnson and the Pathfinder-class survey ship USNS Bowditch passed through the Taiwan Strait from Tuesday to Wednesday last week. That was the first time a US warship has transited the Strait since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House, attracting international attention.
The news was announced to the world by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command on Wednesday last week, accompanied by a strong statement. That behavior differed from Beijing’s previous pattern of waiting for the US military to release a report before issuing a condemnation.
It has almost become routine for US warships to transit the Taiwan Strait, so why did Beijing express its dissatisfaction differently this time? There is some speculation that, this time, the US vessels’ route was different from that of previous missions, signaling something unusual. That poses more of a direct challenge to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) territorial assertions over the Taiwan Strait — as a result, Beijing adopted a tougher stance in its response.
First, the USNS Bowditch spent nearly three days transiting the Strait — that demonstrates the ship might have not been merely passing through, but was possibly conducting maritime route exploration and surveys under the watchful eyes of PLA Navy vessels.
More importantly, the ship’s actions appeared to send an international message that the US Navy has already begun expanding battlefield management in the Taiwan Strait — that implies that the US Navy would be prepared to intervene in the event of a military conflict in the region. Thus, Beijing took the initiative to issue a warning and condemnation.
Second, in recent years, Beijing’s use of “legal warfare” over the Taiwan Strait has primarily focused on the argument that most of the strait falls within its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). According to Article 9 of the Chinese 1998 Law on the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf: “Any international organization, foreign organization or individual engaging in marine scientific research in the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf of the People’s Republic of China must have the approval of the competent authorities of the People’s Republic of China and shall comply with the laws and regulations of the People’s Republic of China.”
Article 11 of the law stipulates: “Any State, provided that it observes international law and the laws and regulations of the People’s Republic of China, shall enjoy in the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of the People’s Republic of China freedom of navigation and overflight and of laying submarine cables and pipelines, and shall enjoy other legal and practical marine benefits associated with these freedoms.”
Thus, the USNS Bowditch’s movements not only contravene Article 9 of the law, but also did not qualify to enjoy the “freedom of navigation” outlined in Article 11. In other words, the US warship’s three-day exploration operation in the Taiwan Strait was tantamount to the US taking concrete action to challenge the CCP’s “legal warfare” in the Taiwan Strait — something Beijing refuses to take lightly.
In the first two weeks of this month, the Chinese military conducted two joint air and naval combat readiness patrols, and one military exercise during the Lantern Festival, near Taiwan. At a time when the PLA frequently conducts drills in the area, those two US warships openly transited the Taiwan Strait and directly showcased US military presence during an ongoing PLA military exercise — it is only natural that Beijing would kick up a fuss.
Chieh Chung is a research fellow and secretary-general at the Association of Strategic Foresight.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS