Two US military vessels, the Arleigh Burke-class destroyer the USS Ralph Johnson and the Pathfinder-class survey ship USNS Bowditch passed through the Taiwan Strait from Tuesday to Wednesday last week. That was the first time a US warship has transited the Strait since US President Donald Trump returned to the White House, attracting international attention.
The news was announced to the world by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) Eastern Theater Command on Wednesday last week, accompanied by a strong statement. That behavior differed from Beijing’s previous pattern of waiting for the US military to release a report before issuing a condemnation.
It has almost become routine for US warships to transit the Taiwan Strait, so why did Beijing express its dissatisfaction differently this time? There is some speculation that, this time, the US vessels’ route was different from that of previous missions, signaling something unusual. That poses more of a direct challenge to the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) territorial assertions over the Taiwan Strait — as a result, Beijing adopted a tougher stance in its response.
First, the USNS Bowditch spent nearly three days transiting the Strait — that demonstrates the ship might have not been merely passing through, but was possibly conducting maritime route exploration and surveys under the watchful eyes of PLA Navy vessels.
More importantly, the ship’s actions appeared to send an international message that the US Navy has already begun expanding battlefield management in the Taiwan Strait — that implies that the US Navy would be prepared to intervene in the event of a military conflict in the region. Thus, Beijing took the initiative to issue a warning and condemnation.
Second, in recent years, Beijing’s use of “legal warfare” over the Taiwan Strait has primarily focused on the argument that most of the strait falls within its exclusive economic zone (EEZ). According to Article 9 of the Chinese 1998 Law on the Exclusive Economic Zone and the Continental Shelf: “Any international organization, foreign organization or individual engaging in marine scientific research in the exclusive economic zone and continental shelf of the People’s Republic of China must have the approval of the competent authorities of the People’s Republic of China and shall comply with the laws and regulations of the People’s Republic of China.”
Article 11 of the law stipulates: “Any State, provided that it observes international law and the laws and regulations of the People’s Republic of China, shall enjoy in the exclusive economic zone and the continental shelf of the People’s Republic of China freedom of navigation and overflight and of laying submarine cables and pipelines, and shall enjoy other legal and practical marine benefits associated with these freedoms.”
Thus, the USNS Bowditch’s movements not only contravene Article 9 of the law, but also did not qualify to enjoy the “freedom of navigation” outlined in Article 11. In other words, the US warship’s three-day exploration operation in the Taiwan Strait was tantamount to the US taking concrete action to challenge the CCP’s “legal warfare” in the Taiwan Strait — something Beijing refuses to take lightly.
In the first two weeks of this month, the Chinese military conducted two joint air and naval combat readiness patrols, and one military exercise during the Lantern Festival, near Taiwan. At a time when the PLA frequently conducts drills in the area, those two US warships openly transited the Taiwan Strait and directly showcased US military presence during an ongoing PLA military exercise — it is only natural that Beijing would kick up a fuss.
Chieh Chung is a research fellow and secretary-general at the Association of Strategic Foresight.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), during an interview for the podcast Lanshuan Time (蘭萱時間) released on Monday, said that a US professor had said that she deserved to be nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize following her meeting earlier this month with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). Cheng’s “journey of peace” has garnered attention from overseas and from within Taiwan. The latest My Formosa poll, conducted last week after the Cheng-Xi meeting, shows that Cheng’s approval rating is 31.5 percent, up 7.6 percentage points compared with the month before. The same poll showed that 44.5 percent of respondents
Taiwan should reject two flawed answers to the Eswatini controversy: that diplomatic allies no longer matter, or that they must be preserved at any cost. The sustainable answer is to maintain formal diplomatic relations while redesigning development relationships around transparency, local ownership and democratic accountability. President William Lai’s (賴清德) canceled trip to Eswatini has elicited two predictable reactions in Taiwan. One camp has argued that the episode proves Taiwan must double down on support for every remaining diplomatic ally, because Beijing is tightening the screws, and formal recognition is too scarce to risk. The other says the opposite: If maintaining
India’s semiconductor strategy is undergoing a quiet, but significant, recalibration. With the rollout of India Semiconductor Mission (ISM) 2.0, New Delhi is signaling a shift away from ambition-driven leaps toward a more grounded, capability-led approach rooted in industrial realities and institutional learning. Rather than attempting to enter the most advanced nodes immediately, India has chosen to prioritize mature technologies in the 28-nanometer to 65-nanometer range. That would not be a retreat, but a strategic alignment with domestic capabilities, market demand and global supply chain gaps. The shift carries the imprimatur of Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi, indicating that the recalibration is
RSS