The large-scale cuts and freezes proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party during deliberations over this year’s central government budget have caused government agencies to face unprecedented operational challenges.
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data showed that the freezes alone amount to NT$138.1 billion (US$4.21 billion) — about 4.6 percent of the total budget — which is nearly nine times higher than the average NT$14 billion freeze of the past three years.
Such excessive freezes are no longer in the realm of fiscal oversight — rather, they are more akin to indirect budget cuts meant to slash the basic operating funds of government agencies.
The budget freezes target specific agencies and projects, demonstrating clear political motive. The Control Yuan’s operating expenses were frozen by 96 percent, the Office of the President’s operating expenses were frozen by 73 percent and the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee’s budget was slashed by 90 percent. In addition, travel expenses to China were uniformly cut by 80 percent, expenses for overseas travel and educational training were reduced by 60 percent and media policy and business promotion expenses were cut by 60 percent.
The cuts and freezes are not adjustments based on specific agencies’ operational requirements, they are part of a tactic to prevent certain departments from performing their duties.
What is even more inconceivable is that the conditions for unfreezing most frozen budgets are excessively rigid and difficult to meet. Therefore, these “frozen” funds have effectively been cut. Some agencies’ frozen funds require that they be released only after completing specific legislative procedures or meeting highly uncertain conditions, which undoubtedly creates significant obstacles to administrative operations.
When the funds of government agencies are effectively cut, certain policies cannot be implemented. Therefore, the public is who would ultimately suffer. Whether it is public services, international exchanges or even basic administrative functions, all could face severe effects.
Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that such large-scale budget freezes have already transcended the scope of fiscal oversight, effectively weakening the operating capacity of the central government and posing a serious threat to the promotion and advancement of major national policies.
He said that budget deliberations should be conducted on a foundation of rationality and professionalism, not be used as a tool for political battles.
The large-scale budget freezes would have significant negative effects on government operations and the provision of public services. While budget oversight is undoubtedly important, excessive budget intervention that jeopardizes the normal operations of administrative departments not only affects government efficiency, but also harms the rights and interests of the public.
Fiscal deliberations must return to the ideals of professionalism and rationality to ensure the effective operation of government agencies. Only in that way can the original purpose of budget planning — to serve the nation and its citizens — be realized, rather than becoming nothing more than a means of political manipulation.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at the College of International Studies and Social Sciences of National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS