The large-scale cuts and freezes proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party during deliberations over this year’s central government budget have caused government agencies to face unprecedented operational challenges.
Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics data showed that the freezes alone amount to NT$138.1 billion (US$4.21 billion) — about 4.6 percent of the total budget — which is nearly nine times higher than the average NT$14 billion freeze of the past three years.
Such excessive freezes are no longer in the realm of fiscal oversight — rather, they are more akin to indirect budget cuts meant to slash the basic operating funds of government agencies.
The budget freezes target specific agencies and projects, demonstrating clear political motive. The Control Yuan’s operating expenses were frozen by 96 percent, the Office of the President’s operating expenses were frozen by 73 percent and the Ill-gotten Party Assets Settlement Committee’s budget was slashed by 90 percent. In addition, travel expenses to China were uniformly cut by 80 percent, expenses for overseas travel and educational training were reduced by 60 percent and media policy and business promotion expenses were cut by 60 percent.
The cuts and freezes are not adjustments based on specific agencies’ operational requirements, they are part of a tactic to prevent certain departments from performing their duties.
What is even more inconceivable is that the conditions for unfreezing most frozen budgets are excessively rigid and difficult to meet. Therefore, these “frozen” funds have effectively been cut. Some agencies’ frozen funds require that they be released only after completing specific legislative procedures or meeting highly uncertain conditions, which undoubtedly creates significant obstacles to administrative operations.
When the funds of government agencies are effectively cut, certain policies cannot be implemented. Therefore, the public is who would ultimately suffer. Whether it is public services, international exchanges or even basic administrative functions, all could face severe effects.
Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) said that such large-scale budget freezes have already transcended the scope of fiscal oversight, effectively weakening the operating capacity of the central government and posing a serious threat to the promotion and advancement of major national policies.
He said that budget deliberations should be conducted on a foundation of rationality and professionalism, not be used as a tool for political battles.
The large-scale budget freezes would have significant negative effects on government operations and the provision of public services. While budget oversight is undoubtedly important, excessive budget intervention that jeopardizes the normal operations of administrative departments not only affects government efficiency, but also harms the rights and interests of the public.
Fiscal deliberations must return to the ideals of professionalism and rationality to ensure the effective operation of government agencies. Only in that way can the original purpose of budget planning — to serve the nation and its citizens — be realized, rather than becoming nothing more than a means of political manipulation.
Edwin Yang is an associate professor at the College of International Studies and Social Sciences of National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
India is not China, and many of its residents fear it never will be. It is hard to imagine a future in which the subcontinent’s manufacturing dominates the world, its foreign investment shapes nations’ destinies, and the challenge of its economic system forces the West to reshape its own policies and principles. However, that is, apparently, what the US administration fears. Speaking in New Delhi last week, US Deputy Secretary of State Christopher Landau warned that “we will not make the same mistakes with India that we did with China 20 years ago.” Although he claimed the recently agreed framework
RSS