Legislators and the president are elected officials, so they should abide by the constitutional system and be held accountable for their decisions made on behalf of the public. That is how a representative democracy and constitutional government should work.
Neither the president nor the legislature should contravene the Constitution, infringe on the rights of other constitutional authorities, disregard people’s rights or behave unscrupulously. If either creates trouble, it would be restrained by other constitutional authorities and a judgement by the Constitutional Court. If the chaos continues, the public has no choice but to take action to remove the troublemakers from power, holding them accountable politically and legally. This demonstrates popular sovereignty and a responsible government.
As the public is the source of the government’s power and authority, it naturally has a say in the disputes between the executive and the legislative branches, and can hold the instigators accountable.
The public is well aware of the attempts by the opposition parties to distort the constitution and confuse right and wrong.
Which branch has been abusing its power and contravening the Constitution? Is it not the legislature?
The Legislative Yuan passed amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) to expand its own authority. After it rejected the Executive Yuan’s request to reconsider the amendments, the DPP caucus, the Executive Yuan, the Presidential Office and the Control Yuan took it to the Constitutional Court, which declared the bill unconstitutional.
However, the opposition parties amended the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法) and rejected all seven of President William Lai’s (賴清德) nominees for the Constitutional Court in a bid to paralyze it. The legislature passed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), allocating NT$370 billion (US$11.29 billion) to local governments, which is going to have a huge effect on the central government’s fiscal planning.
It passed this year’s central government budget with record cuts to national defense, social welfare, healthcare, social security, education, culture and operating fees in an attempt to tie the government down even further.
It also passed amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) to restrict the right of the public to recall elected officials.
It is obvious who the troublemakers are.
Following the Lunar New Year holiday, the effects of the budget cuts have become crystal clear. The Executive Yuan’s central, southern and eastern Joint Services Centers can only maintain the most basic level of operations. The Ministry of Health and Welfare’s budget to promote disease prevention has been slashed, undermining its campaigns to encourage immunization and healthy diets. Budgets for workers taking leave to get pregnancy checkups or accompany their partner, and paternity leave wage subsidies have been slashed or frozen, affecting the rights and interests of first-time parents and small enterprises.
The Legislative Yuan continues to sow chaos, but the public is not helpless. People can exercise their right of recall as granted by Article 17 of the Constitution to restore order and restart the legislature.
There is no need for political parties to bicker over who is causing the trouble. They should accept the scrutiny and leave it to the voters to decide.
Yao Meng-chang is an assistant professor in Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Postgraduate Legal Studies.
Translated by Fion Khan
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
History might remember 2026, not 2022, as the year artificial intelligence (AI) truly changed everything. ChatGPT’s launch was a product moment. What is happening now is an anthropological moment: AI is no longer merely answering questions. It is now taking initiative and learning from others to get things done, behaving less like software and more like a colleague. The economic consequence is the rise of the one-person company — a structure anticipated in the 2024 book The Choices Amid Great Changes, which I coauthored. The real target of AI is not labor. It is hierarchy. When AI sharply reduces the cost
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
I wrote this before US President Donald Trump embarked on his uneventful state visit to China on Thursday. So, I shall confine my observations to the joint US-Philippine military exercise of April 20 through May 8, known collectively as “Balikatan 2026.” This year’s Balikatan was notable for its “firsts.” First, it was conducted primarily with Taiwan in mind, not the Philippines or even the South China Sea. It also showed that in the Pacific, America’s alliance network is still robust. Allies are enthusiastic about America’s renewed leadership in the region. Nine decades ago, in 1936, America had neither military strength
RSS