Legislators and the president are elected officials, so they should abide by the constitutional system and be held accountable for their decisions made on behalf of the public. That is how a representative democracy and constitutional government should work.
Neither the president nor the legislature should contravene the Constitution, infringe on the rights of other constitutional authorities, disregard people’s rights or behave unscrupulously. If either creates trouble, it would be restrained by other constitutional authorities and a judgement by the Constitutional Court. If the chaos continues, the public has no choice but to take action to remove the troublemakers from power, holding them accountable politically and legally. This demonstrates popular sovereignty and a responsible government.
As the public is the source of the government’s power and authority, it naturally has a say in the disputes between the executive and the legislative branches, and can hold the instigators accountable.
The public is well aware of the attempts by the opposition parties to distort the constitution and confuse right and wrong.
Which branch has been abusing its power and contravening the Constitution? Is it not the legislature?
The Legislative Yuan passed amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) to expand its own authority. After it rejected the Executive Yuan’s request to reconsider the amendments, the DPP caucus, the Executive Yuan, the Presidential Office and the Control Yuan took it to the Constitutional Court, which declared the bill unconstitutional.
However, the opposition parties amended the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法) and rejected all seven of President William Lai’s (賴清德) nominees for the Constitutional Court in a bid to paralyze it. The legislature passed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), allocating NT$370 billion (US$11.29 billion) to local governments, which is going to have a huge effect on the central government’s fiscal planning.
It passed this year’s central government budget with record cuts to national defense, social welfare, healthcare, social security, education, culture and operating fees in an attempt to tie the government down even further.
It also passed amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) to restrict the right of the public to recall elected officials.
It is obvious who the troublemakers are.
Following the Lunar New Year holiday, the effects of the budget cuts have become crystal clear. The Executive Yuan’s central, southern and eastern Joint Services Centers can only maintain the most basic level of operations. The Ministry of Health and Welfare’s budget to promote disease prevention has been slashed, undermining its campaigns to encourage immunization and healthy diets. Budgets for workers taking leave to get pregnancy checkups or accompany their partner, and paternity leave wage subsidies have been slashed or frozen, affecting the rights and interests of first-time parents and small enterprises.
The Legislative Yuan continues to sow chaos, but the public is not helpless. People can exercise their right of recall as granted by Article 17 of the Constitution to restore order and restart the legislature.
There is no need for political parties to bicker over who is causing the trouble. They should accept the scrutiny and leave it to the voters to decide.
Yao Meng-chang is an assistant professor in Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Postgraduate Legal Studies.
Translated by Fion Khan
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
“Can you tell me where the time and motivation will come from to get students to improve their English proficiency in four years of university?” The teacher’s question — not accusatory, just slightly exasperated — was directed at the panelists at the end of a recent conference on English language learning at Taiwanese universities. Perhaps thankfully for the professors on stage, her question was too big for the five minutes remaining. However, it hung over the venue like an ominous cloud on an otherwise sunny-skies day of research into English as a medium of instruction and the government’s Bilingual Nation 2030
RSS