Legislators and the president are elected officials, so they should abide by the constitutional system and be held accountable for their decisions made on behalf of the public. That is how a representative democracy and constitutional government should work.
Neither the president nor the legislature should contravene the Constitution, infringe on the rights of other constitutional authorities, disregard people’s rights or behave unscrupulously. If either creates trouble, it would be restrained by other constitutional authorities and a judgement by the Constitutional Court. If the chaos continues, the public has no choice but to take action to remove the troublemakers from power, holding them accountable politically and legally. This demonstrates popular sovereignty and a responsible government.
As the public is the source of the government’s power and authority, it naturally has a say in the disputes between the executive and the legislative branches, and can hold the instigators accountable.
The public is well aware of the attempts by the opposition parties to distort the constitution and confuse right and wrong.
Which branch has been abusing its power and contravening the Constitution? Is it not the legislature?
The Legislative Yuan passed amendments to the Act Governing the Legislative Yuan’s Power (立法院職權行使法) to expand its own authority. After it rejected the Executive Yuan’s request to reconsider the amendments, the DPP caucus, the Executive Yuan, the Presidential Office and the Control Yuan took it to the Constitutional Court, which declared the bill unconstitutional.
However, the opposition parties amended the Constitutional Court Procedure Act (憲法訴訟法) and rejected all seven of President William Lai’s (賴清德) nominees for the Constitutional Court in a bid to paralyze it. The legislature passed amendments to the Act Governing the Allocation of Government Revenues and Expenditures (財政收支劃分法), allocating NT$370 billion (US$11.29 billion) to local governments, which is going to have a huge effect on the central government’s fiscal planning.
It passed this year’s central government budget with record cuts to national defense, social welfare, healthcare, social security, education, culture and operating fees in an attempt to tie the government down even further.
It also passed amendments to the Public Officials Election and Recall Act (公職人員選舉罷免法) to restrict the right of the public to recall elected officials.
It is obvious who the troublemakers are.
Following the Lunar New Year holiday, the effects of the budget cuts have become crystal clear. The Executive Yuan’s central, southern and eastern Joint Services Centers can only maintain the most basic level of operations. The Ministry of Health and Welfare’s budget to promote disease prevention has been slashed, undermining its campaigns to encourage immunization and healthy diets. Budgets for workers taking leave to get pregnancy checkups or accompany their partner, and paternity leave wage subsidies have been slashed or frozen, affecting the rights and interests of first-time parents and small enterprises.
The Legislative Yuan continues to sow chaos, but the public is not helpless. People can exercise their right of recall as granted by Article 17 of the Constitution to restore order and restart the legislature.
There is no need for political parties to bicker over who is causing the trouble. They should accept the scrutiny and leave it to the voters to decide.
Yao Meng-chang is an assistant professor in Fu Jen Catholic University’s Department of Postgraduate Legal Studies.
Translated by Fion Khan
The Chinese government on March 29 sent shock waves through the Tibetan Buddhist community by announcing the untimely death of one of its most revered spiritual figures, Hungkar Dorje Rinpoche. His sudden passing in Vietnam raised widespread suspicion and concern among his followers, who demanded an investigation. International human rights organization Human Rights Watch joined their call and urged a thorough investigation into his death, highlighting the potential involvement of the Chinese government. At just 56 years old, Rinpoche was influential not only as a spiritual leader, but also for his steadfast efforts to preserve and promote Tibetan identity and cultural
Former minister of culture Lung Ying-tai (龍應台) has long wielded influence through the power of words. Her articles once served as a moral compass for a society in transition. However, as her April 1 guest article in the New York Times, “The Clock Is Ticking for Taiwan,” makes all too clear, even celebrated prose can mislead when romanticism clouds political judgement. Lung crafts a narrative that is less an analysis of Taiwan’s geopolitical reality than an exercise in wistful nostalgia. As political scientists and international relations academics, we believe it is crucial to correct the misconceptions embedded in her article,
Strategic thinker Carl von Clausewitz has said that “war is politics by other means,” while investment guru Warren Buffett has said that “tariffs are an act of war.” Both aphorisms apply to China, which has long been engaged in a multifront political, economic and informational war against the US and the rest of the West. Kinetically also, China has launched the early stages of actual global conflict with its threats and aggressive moves against Taiwan, the Philippines and Japan, and its support for North Korea’s reckless actions against South Korea that could reignite the Korean War. Former US presidents Barack Obama
The pan-blue camp in the era after the rule of the two Chiangs — former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) — can be roughly divided into two main factions: the “true blue,” who insist on opposing communism to protect the Republic of China (ROC), and the “red-blue,” who completely reject the current government and would rather collude with the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) to control Taiwan. The families of the former group suffered brutally under the hands of communist thugs in China. They know the CPP well and harbor a deep hatred for it — the two
RSS