Civil society groups have initiated recall votes against Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators in 18 constituencies nationwide, submitting more than 100,000 signatures to the Central Election Commission on Monday last week, the first working day after the Lunar New Year holiday.
A new wave of activism and awareness has surged in Taiwan. Political observers believe participants of the recall movement come from across the political spectrum, with people joining the petitions not only including supporters of the pan-green camp, but also die-hard blues from military dependents’ villages who are furious about the opposition lawmakers’ ridiculous betrayal of the country.
Therefore, it is not a partisan political struggle, but a symbol of Taiwanese resistance against the Chinese Communist Party’s (CPP) infiltration and the protection of democratic values. This is also an important test of whether Taiwanese would choose protecting the country over selling it to China.
The KMT and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) are cooperating with the CCP, abusing their legislative power to damage the nation’s democratic system.
Taiwanese should not stand idly by. Instead, they should demonstrate their power as democratic citizens in this recall movement to safeguard our country’s dignity and democratic way of life.
This movement demonstrates Taiwanese civic awareness, in which people unite to guard Taiwan’s democracy. The CCP thought it could bribe legislators with benefits and control the legislature to upend Taiwan. Their actions have provoked a backlash.
The KMT and TPP legislators thought the ruling party would not dare to initiate a recall vote. This is why they have recklessly promoted unconstitutional bills, attacked the democratic system and undermined the country’s national security and economic resilience.
They have overlooked the fact that the real master of the country is its electorate, not political parties or politicians. Taiwanese would not allow wicked servants to bully their masters and destroy the country.
The right of recall is granted by the Constitution. It is a legitimate mechanism to hold politicians accountable and not, as its detractors suggest, a means to create chaos or cause trouble.
This recall movement is not about punishing any legislator in particular, nor is it a confrontation between the green camp and the blue camp. Rather, it is about the larger principle of democracy over authoritarianism and freedom over slavery in the face of the CCP’s infiltration tactics and threats.
Taiwanese must demonstrate their determination to prevent evildoers from harming Taiwan’s national security. Recalling these legislators is the only way for Taiwan to protect its constitutional system and demonstrate its democratic resilience, allowing the entire world to witness its commitment to freedom and justice.
Taiwanese should be aware of the CCP’s ambitions and stand up against any actions that would infringe upon Taiwan’s sovereignty. The public should show the international community that there is no room for negotiation.
Totalitarian regimes thrive on people’s ignorance and servitude. Taiwanese are fully aware of their civil rights and that they are the masters of the country. This is not something that can be taken away by threat of conquering by force.
Taiwan is for Taiwanese to save. This nationwide recall movement is flourishing, becoming a milestone in Taiwan’s democratic development and the foundation for the future of the country.
Pan Wei-yiu is the secretary-general of the Northern Taiwan Society.
Translated by Fion Khan
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS