Now that US President Donald Trump has taken office, markets and the economy have a new and very different driving force. Forget about the US Federal Reserve. The US’ outlook would depend much more on how, and to what extent, the president puts his plans on everything from tariffs to deportations into action.
What to expect? That is a very difficult question. Nevertheless, one can make an educated guess. Here is mine.
Trump would take tariffs much higher than before — to at least 10 percent of aggregate imports, compared with 3 percent in his first term. He is genuinely a fan, seeing them as a great negotiating tool and income generator. His government needs the revenue, given projected budget deficits of about 6 percent of GDP over the next decade (and that is assuming no extension of the 2017 tax cuts). As a result, inflation would probably run 25 to 50 basis points higher over the next year, as importers pass on costs and protected domestic producers raise prices. This price shock would come at a time when inflation is already above the Fed’s 2 percent target. It would depress consumer spending, especially for lower-income households that have no savings buffer and spend more of their income on imported goods.
Trump would follow through on deportations, but I expect less rather than more. Ejecting millions of people from the US is logistically difficult. A committed effort would take years, not months, and the resulting labor shortages would be too economically damaging. Still, even a smaller number — say, focused on convicted criminals — would exacerbate a shortage of workers that is limiting growth. Together with former US president Joe Biden’s crackdown on border crossings, the retirement of baby boomers and the already elevated participation rate among prime-age workers, modest deportations could hold the annual increase in the labor supply to less than 0.5 percent. This implies a maximum real GDP growth rate of just 1.5 percent to 2.5 percent.
Trump and Congress would extend the 2017 tax cuts, but would not enact other costly campaign promises, such as reducing taxation of social security benefits and tips. Given the dire budget outlook, some Republicans would balk at added tax cuts without offsetting spending cuts, which would be hard to agree on. Consensus is lacking: House and Senate Republicans have differing appetites for fiscal probity, while Democrats are likely united against bigger tax cuts (with the exception of increasing the state-and-local-tax deduction).
For this year, all this suggests a difficult economic trajectory. Expect higher inflation, elevated interest rates, slower growth and more volatility as markets and the Fed struggle to adjust to Trump’s pronouncements and actions. In short, prepare for turbulence ahead.
Bill Dudley, a Bloomberg Opinion columnist, served as president of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York from 2009 to 2018. He is the chair of the Bretton Woods Committee, and has been a nonexecutive director at Swiss bank UBS since 2019. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
During the “426 rally” organized by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party under the slogan “fight green communism, resist dictatorship,” leaders from the two opposition parties framed it as a battle against an allegedly authoritarian administration led by President William Lai (賴清德). While criticism of the government can be a healthy expression of a vibrant, pluralistic society, and protests are quite common in Taiwan, the discourse of the 426 rally nonetheless betrayed troubling signs of collective amnesia. Specifically, the KMT, which imposed 38 years of martial law in Taiwan from 1949 to 1987, has never fully faced its
Taiwan People’s Party Legislator-at-large Liu Shu-pin (劉書彬) asked Premier Cho Jung-tai (卓榮泰) a question on Tuesday last week about President William Lai’s (賴清德) decision in March to officially define the People’s Republic of China (PRC), as governed by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), as a foreign hostile force. Liu objected to Lai’s decision on two grounds. First, procedurally, suggesting that Lai did not have the right to unilaterally make that decision, and that Cho should have consulted with the Executive Yuan before he endorsed it. Second, Liu objected over national security concerns, saying that the CCP and Chinese President Xi
RSS