This is the season of goodwill and giving, when the UK’s charitable sector comes to the fore. As someone who has been active as a philanthropist in the UK for more than 40 years, I know what a difference philanthropy can make, particularly to the arts and cultural sector. It is a lot more than just giving money or one’s treasures. It is also about the other “Ts” of time and talent. Inspired by The Twelve Days of Christmas, I have identified 12 bold measures we can take to strengthen and expand philanthropy in the UK.
Establish a government-backed match fund for philanthropy: People are 84 percent more likely to give to a charitable cause if match funding is offered. The UK should build on successful models such as the Big Give to create a dedicated match fund for targeted sectors such as culture. By doubling individual and corporate contributions, that government backing could foster local and national cultural growth. Match funding is a proven catalyst for philanthropic giving and would provide a significant boost to underfunded cultural initiatives.
Create a strong presence for philanthropy in government: A permanent, dedicated government policy unit for philanthropy would embed giving at the heart of policy decisions. Led by a philanthropy champion, that unit could collaborate across departments to promote localized giving initiatives and ensure cultural philanthropy is a key focus of public policy.
Amplify national giving initiatives and a philanthropy ambassadors program: The UK does not have the same celebratory culture of giving as other countries (particularly the US). We need to encourage people to celebrate their generosity and inspire others, so raising awareness of national initiatives such as Giving Tuesday and Volunteers’ Week is essential. Appointing high-profile cultural philanthropists as ambassadors to inspire public and private donations would help to amplify the impact of these campaigns.
Incentivize corporate match funding for employee “give as you earn” initiatives: Workplace giving programs are a powerful yet underutilized tool. Encouraging employees to make tax-efficient donations directly from their salaries, coupled with employers matching contributions, could significantly boost charitable funding. The government could offer incentives to businesses to participate in these programs.
Simplify and promote Gift Aid and other tax incentives for giving: Gift Aid has immense potential, but about ￡560 million (US$704 million) of tax relief goes unclaimed each year, because of complexities in the claiming process. Simplifying Gift Aid, particularly for small and medium-sized charities, is an obvious way to unlock millions annually. Public campaigns to raise awareness about Gift Aid and other tax incentives, such as credits for donations to underfunded cultural causes, would further encourage giving.
Work with local leaders to stimulate regional philanthropy: Regional initiatives such as Leeds Community Foundation’s One for the City, where businesses commit a percentage of their profit to local charities, provide a blueprint for place-based philanthropy. Convening roundtables with regional business leaders and philanthropists can replicate and scale such efforts across the UK.
Establish “Charitable Action Zones” to localize philanthropy: That initiative could target areas with high need and low levels of giving. By providing targeted matched funding, these zones would attract private investment and drive regional social impact. Similar to the US Community Development Financial Institutions Fund, that approach leverages public backing to deliver greater social impact.
Introduce “everyday philanthropy” campaigns to promote a positive national narrative: Philanthropy is not just for ultra-high net worth individuals. Government-led campaigns could champion accessible ways for people to support arts and culture, from volunteering to monthly micro-donations. By celebrating everyday acts of generosity, those initiatives would foster a more inclusive culture of giving.
Collaborate with trusts and foundations to expand support: Trusts and foundations are vital to the UK’s cultural landscape. By identifying funding gaps and cofunding opportunities, the government can align public and private resources for maximum impact. Long-standing collaborations, such as the UK’s Department for Digital, Culture, Media and Sport/Wolfson Museums and Galleries Improvement Fund, are a testament to the power of partnership.
Standardize and encourage philanthropy training for wealth advisers: Wealth advisers are gatekeepers to significant potential giving. Yet, philanthropy advice remains fragmented. By working with the UK’s Financial Conduct Authority to make philanthropy a standard part of adviser training, the government can unlock new funding streams for cultural organizations.
Share and use local data: Data is playing an increasingly important role in philanthropy. Government-supported platforms that integrate local needs with charity services could revolutionize how resources are allocated. By combining information from charities, funders and local authorities, we can direct funding to where it is needed most.
Introduce an optional donation from lottery winners: Providing a choice to donate a portion of their winnings to cultural organizations could unlock a significant new funding stream, allowing them to contribute while celebrating their good fortune.
Together, these measures form a road map to transform philanthropy in the UK. Philanthropy has the power to drive change, unite communities and address social challenges in ways that public and private sectors alone cannot. By embracing bold initiatives and fostering a culture of generosity in this coming year, the UK can unleash the full potential of philanthropy to enrich lives and build a better future for all.
John Studzinski is a philanthropist, and the founder and chairman of the Genesis Foundation. He has been managing director and vice chairman of Pacific Investment Management Co since 2018.
On May 7, 1971, Henry Kissinger planned his first, ultra-secret mission to China and pondered whether it would be better to meet his Chinese interlocutors “in Pakistan where the Pakistanis would tape the meeting — or in China where the Chinese would do the taping.” After a flicker of thought, he decided to have the Chinese do all the tape recording, translating and transcribing. Fortuitously, historians have several thousand pages of verbatim texts of Dr. Kissinger’s negotiations with his Chinese counterparts. Paradoxically, behind the scenes, Chinese stenographers prepared verbatim English language typescripts faster than they could translate and type them
More than 30 years ago when I immigrated to the US, applied for citizenship and took the 100-question civics test, the one part of the naturalization process that left the deepest impression on me was one question on the N-400 form, which asked: “Have you ever been a member of, involved in or in any way associated with any communist or totalitarian party anywhere in the world?” Answering “yes” could lead to the rejection of your application. Some people might try their luck and lie, but if exposed, the consequences could be much worse — a person could be fined,
On May 13, the Legislative Yuan passed an amendment to Article 6 of the Nuclear Reactor Facilities Regulation Act (核子反應器設施管制法) that would extend the life of nuclear reactors from 40 to 60 years, thereby providing a legal basis for the extension or reactivation of nuclear power plants. On May 20, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) legislators used their numerical advantage to pass the TPP caucus’ proposal for a public referendum that would determine whether the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant should resume operations, provided it is deemed safe by the authorities. The Central Election Commission (CEC) has
When China passed its “Anti-Secession” Law in 2005, much of the democratic world saw it as yet another sign of Beijing’s authoritarianism, its contempt for international law and its aggressive posture toward Taiwan. Rightly so — on the surface. However, this move, often dismissed as a uniquely Chinese form of legal intimidation, echoes a legal and historical precedent rooted not in authoritarian tradition, but in US constitutional history. The Chinese “Anti-Secession” Law, a domestic statute threatening the use of force should Taiwan formally declare independence, is widely interpreted as an emblem of the Chinese Communist Party’s disregard for international norms. Critics
RSS