Importance of definitions
With the indictment of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), political parties are scrambling to formulate responses. While they publicly express respect for the judicial process, each has its own agenda.
The truth is the impetus to corruption is part of human nature, unrelated to party affiliation. A political party is an organization formed by individuals who share similar political ideologies — it is not formed on the basis of similar natures or congeniality. To quote Song Dynasty poet Dai Fugu’s (戴復古) Jixing (寄興), “Gold is rarely pure and man never perfect.”
I often tell my students that when engaging in discussions or writing, they must understand the core definition of a topic and avoid losing focus. I like to use this story as an example:
An instructor teaching a course on “Life and Death” asked his students to reflect on the greatest loss they are currently experiencing. The students’ answers varied. One student said, “I have never had a girlfriend,” which prompted the instructor to correct him.
“If you never had one to begin with, how can that be considered a loss?”
That shows the importance of definitions.
As written in Chinese Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi’s (莊子) Cutting Open the Satchels (胠篋): “As long as sages exist, great robbers will not cease to appear.”
In conversation and debate, we often use our own strengths to attack others’ weaknesses. However, at the very least, we should ensure that the definition is well-established — otherwise, our words would be wasted and only make matters worse.
Is Ko’s case not just like that? He repeatedly said that the “blue” Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) and “green” Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) “garbage” was indistinguishable, expressing disgust for the KMT’s black money connections and resentment toward the DPP’s rapid decline.
He said the TPP was a clean and pure political party. Many voters believed in him, devoutly following him as if he were some kind of god-like figure.
Now, Ko has fallen from his altar and shattered his own image. As for his young supporters who continue to follow him, perhaps it is time to reflect on their judgement.
Cheng Kuo-cheng
Taipei
The fate of TPP without Ko
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) wants to step down as party chairman, but the TPP refuses to acknowledge his resignation.
On Thursday, the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office indicted Ko on charges of corruption, embezzlement, breach of trust and other offenses, seeking a combined sentence of 28 years and six months.
The TPP held a press conference in response, calling the indictment political persecution.
TPP Central Committee member Lin Fu-nan (林富男) even went so far as to say that even if Ko submits a letter of resignation, the central committee would not accept it. Instead, they would wait for Ko’s return so that he could continue leading the party. There is no second choice for party chairman — they would only accept Ko, and there is no need to determine an acting chairman.
Since the TPP’s establishment — although it has the structure and setup of a formal organization — nearly all operational decisions have been made by Ko, leading to criticism that it is a “one-man party.” Now that prosecutors have indicted Ko on such serious charges and he has released a statement of resignation, the TPP is left clinging onto his leg, refusing to let him go. The party’s behavior only corroborates previous criticism — the TPP is indeed a one-man party.
The TPP harshly criticized the indictment, labeling it “political persecution,” but their argument is weak — they are avoiding what is important and dwelling on the trivial details for fear of losing support from Ko’s followers.
The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office dispatched seven prosecutors for the investigation and they had sorted through vast amounts of evidence — as many as 148 pieces of physical and documentary evidence, along with witness testimonies. The indictment spans almost 300 pages, with two large volumes of evidence lists containing purported proof of collusion with businesspeople and the close implication of interest exchanges.
How could that be considered “political persecution”? If the TPP continues to blindly support Ko — failing to consider alternative paths and lacking the power to forge its own — it is condemned to history.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
As Taiwan’s domestic political crisis deepens, the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) have proposed gutting the country’s national spending, with steep cuts to the critical foreign and defense ministries. While the blue-white coalition alleges that it is merely responding to voters’ concerns about corruption and mismanagement, of which there certainly has been plenty under Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and KMT-led governments, the rationales for their proposed spending cuts lay bare the incoherent foreign policy of the KMT-led coalition. Introduced on the eve of US President Donald Trump’s inauguration, the KMT’s proposed budget is a terrible opening
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS