Importance of definitions
With the indictment of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲), political parties are scrambling to formulate responses. While they publicly express respect for the judicial process, each has its own agenda.
The truth is the impetus to corruption is part of human nature, unrelated to party affiliation. A political party is an organization formed by individuals who share similar political ideologies — it is not formed on the basis of similar natures or congeniality. To quote Song Dynasty poet Dai Fugu’s (戴復古) Jixing (寄興), “Gold is rarely pure and man never perfect.”
I often tell my students that when engaging in discussions or writing, they must understand the core definition of a topic and avoid losing focus. I like to use this story as an example:
An instructor teaching a course on “Life and Death” asked his students to reflect on the greatest loss they are currently experiencing. The students’ answers varied. One student said, “I have never had a girlfriend,” which prompted the instructor to correct him.
“If you never had one to begin with, how can that be considered a loss?”
That shows the importance of definitions.
As written in Chinese Taoist philosopher Zhuangzi’s (莊子) Cutting Open the Satchels (胠篋): “As long as sages exist, great robbers will not cease to appear.”
In conversation and debate, we often use our own strengths to attack others’ weaknesses. However, at the very least, we should ensure that the definition is well-established — otherwise, our words would be wasted and only make matters worse.
Is Ko’s case not just like that? He repeatedly said that the “blue” Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) and “green” Democratic Progressive Party’s (DPP) “garbage” was indistinguishable, expressing disgust for the KMT’s black money connections and resentment toward the DPP’s rapid decline.
He said the TPP was a clean and pure political party. Many voters believed in him, devoutly following him as if he were some kind of god-like figure.
Now, Ko has fallen from his altar and shattered his own image. As for his young supporters who continue to follow him, perhaps it is time to reflect on their judgement.
Cheng Kuo-cheng
Taipei
The fate of TPP without Ko
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) wants to step down as party chairman, but the TPP refuses to acknowledge his resignation.
On Thursday, the Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office indicted Ko on charges of corruption, embezzlement, breach of trust and other offenses, seeking a combined sentence of 28 years and six months.
The TPP held a press conference in response, calling the indictment political persecution.
TPP Central Committee member Lin Fu-nan (林富男) even went so far as to say that even if Ko submits a letter of resignation, the central committee would not accept it. Instead, they would wait for Ko’s return so that he could continue leading the party. There is no second choice for party chairman — they would only accept Ko, and there is no need to determine an acting chairman.
Since the TPP’s establishment — although it has the structure and setup of a formal organization — nearly all operational decisions have been made by Ko, leading to criticism that it is a “one-man party.” Now that prosecutors have indicted Ko on such serious charges and he has released a statement of resignation, the TPP is left clinging onto his leg, refusing to let him go. The party’s behavior only corroborates previous criticism — the TPP is indeed a one-man party.
The TPP harshly criticized the indictment, labeling it “political persecution,” but their argument is weak — they are avoiding what is important and dwelling on the trivial details for fear of losing support from Ko’s followers.
The Taipei District Prosecutors’ Office dispatched seven prosecutors for the investigation and they had sorted through vast amounts of evidence — as many as 148 pieces of physical and documentary evidence, along with witness testimonies. The indictment spans almost 300 pages, with two large volumes of evidence lists containing purported proof of collusion with businesspeople and the close implication of interest exchanges.
How could that be considered “political persecution”? If the TPP continues to blindly support Ko — failing to consider alternative paths and lacking the power to forge its own — it is condemned to history.
Chi An-hsiu
Taipei
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
RSS