It finally might be happening: A quarter-century after Nissan Motor Co’s bailout by Renault SA, six years after the shock arrest of savior-turned-fugitive Carlos Ghosn and five years after it was first proposed, the troubled Japanese automaker might find a permanent ally in the form of Honda Motor Co.
An agreement for the two carmakers to seek a merger could come as early as Monday — a Christmas gift that is not a moment too soon. There are lots of problems with the proposed combination, but it is the deal that is available. The alternatives look a lot less pretty.
Regardless of what you might have read, Japan’s auto industry is not collapsing: Toyota Motor Corp has been the world’s largest carmaker for the last four years running, and its decision to stick with hybrids while rivals rushed into electric vehicles (EV) looks increasingly smart. That is especially true in the US, where the incoming administration of US president-elect Donald Trump is reportedly preparing to cut support for EVs and block cars and components from China.
Illustration: Kevin Sheu
However, Nissan is struggling — burning through cash and with billions of dollars of debt due in a little more than a year. Like Honda, it is discovering, like so many firms before them, that overdependence on a fickle Chinese market is dangerous, and it is running short of options and friends: Nissan’s alliance with Renault was always the wrong fit for both parties, held together only by Ghosn’s outsized personality.
A mooted merger with such a key-man risk was always a bad idea, and both parties have mostly been trying to unravel it ever since his arrest.
Is the famously independent Honda the right choice? Hours after the initial stories of the merger, further reports broke that Taiwan’s Hon Hai Precision Industry Co, known as Foxconn Technology Group internationally, had sought to take control of Nissan. It is a curious choice, until one considers that former Nissan vice chief operating officer Jun Seki, the third-highest-ranked executive, is the chief strategy officer for Hon Hai’s EV arm.
However, Foxconn, with great ambition, but little experience in the car business, might have been no better a fit than Renault. Consider its flawed stewardship of the last faded Japanese giant it bought, Sharp Corp, which has reported massive losses for the last two years and is exiting TV panel production, with its share price down 96 percent from its peak.
With the rest of the domestic sector in bed with Toyota — which owns stakes in Mazda Motor Corp, Suzuki Motor Corp, Subaru Corp and Isuzu Motors Ltd, along with half of Hino Motors Ltd and the whole of Daihatsu Motor Co — Nissan does not have much choice. (The country’s other carmaker, Mitsubishi Motors Corp, is part of Nissan’s alliance and would seemingly be subsumed into the newly merged entity in time.)
That means a Nissan-Honda deal would, at long last, create two poles in Japan’s auto industry — one broader reason the deal should be welcomed. It might also be a sign that the authorities might be focusing on the bigger picture for its automakers, having wasted much of the last 12 months chastising Toyota and others with scarcely important testing lapses, even as a generational change occurs in the industry.
Doubtless, it would be far from ideal. Much depends on the terms: Should it be conducted as a face-saving merger, where Nissan is given equal weight to the much larger Honda, then it is right to be skeptical. Such dignity-preserving alliances of unequals have been common in Japanese mergers and acquisitions over the years, but quickly led to power struggles among competing fiefdoms.
Concerning, too, is that this is happening from a position of weakness, perhaps in a hasty attempt to dodge Foxconn and keep Nissan in Japanese control. It would have been far better to take this step five years ago, when it was reportedly first proposed by the country’s powerful Ministry of Economy, Trade and Industry.
Nissan and Honda also have relatively little synergy for parts in their competing platforms, but what choice do they have? It gives both firms the chance to find benefits in what would be the world’s third-biggest automaker by sales, in an era where bit-players are going to get left behind.
In particular, Nissan might benefit from Honda’s stable management after a post-Ghosn era marked by a power vacuum and executive churn.
It could also bring Nissan, the company that mass-produced the first EV, into Afeela, Honda’s intriguing EV tie-up with Sony Group Corp, another national champion.
After all, just like when choosing a car, there is never a perfect answer — just the set of wheels that best fits your needs.
Gearoid Reidy is a Bloomberg Opinion columnist covering Japan and the Koreas. He previously led the breaking news team in North Asia, and was the Tokyo deputy bureau chief. This column does not necessarily reflect the opinion of the editorial board or Bloomberg LP and its owners.
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS