In addressing the issue of workplace bullying, Taiwan’s response has been that of a rational and civilized society. However, China’s frequent use of political and military intimidation to prevent Taiwan from becoming a normal country are threats far worse than bullying — why then, do some political parties swallow this humiliation?
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — who served two terms as Taipei’s mayor — and current Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) have both behaved courteously in the face of humiliation during the Taipei-Shanghai Twin-City Forum.
As mayor, Ko insisted on holding the forum despite opposition. Many big bosses scrambled to get a table at the forum, and many have been revealed to be on the list of people involved in Ko’s corruption scandal.
Chiang claims to be a proud member of the family of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), yet he holds no regard for his great grandfather’s and grandfather’s anti-communist spirit. Prior to his election, Chiang Wan-an insisted that the forum would not be held if the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) continued its military harassment of Taiwan — but he went back on his word and held the event. He even accepted the unequal condition that the forum would only be attended by Shanghai Vice Mayor Hua Yuan (華源). Chiang clearly deceived voters.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) sees Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) as a remnant of China — a fragment of its regime that fled to Taiwan — and seeks to eliminate it swiftly. The ROC is no longer under the control of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), but the KMT still intentionally views the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) — a party that came to power through a fair, democratic process — with more hostility than the CCP. This explains why the KMT reacts strongly to domestic workplace bullying, but disregards China’s incessant bullying of Taiwan.
Throughout the Twin-City Forum, neither Ko nor Chiang treated Taiwan with the dignity of an equal sovereign nation — instead, they subordinated themselves to a country that wishes to annex Taiwan. They prioritized their relationship with the People’s Republic of China while harboring animosity toward the ruling DPP, thereby failing to cherish the value of Taiwan’s democratization.
The Taipei side of the Twin-City Forum insists that there are benefits to exchanges. However, since the forum’s inception, it has failed to truly improve or promote the foundational cross-strait relationship via the two cities. Instead, it has become a tool for China’s “united front” propaganda efforts against Taiwan, while Taipei continues to submit to and flatter Shanghai. With the goal of annexation, China continues its military threats toward Taiwan. China is entirely ill-intentioned, and the forum serves as nothing but a political facade — an echo of Taipei’s placation in the face of China’s bullying.
In response to China’s harassment, Taiwan must adopt the attitude of a normal country — only when it respects itself can it expect to earn the respect of others. The fight against harassment should not be limited to discussions about workplace bullying. Politicians must also take a firm stance against China’s persistent bullying of Taiwan.
Chiang broke his pre-election promises, washing his hands clean of his father and grandfather. These anti-Taiwan political parties are welcoming China’s harassment.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In their New York Times bestseller How Democracies Die, Harvard political scientists Steven Levitsky and Daniel Ziblatt said that democracies today “may die at the hands not of generals but of elected leaders. Many government efforts to subvert democracy are ‘legal,’ in the sense that they are approved by the legislature or accepted by the courts. They may even be portrayed as efforts to improve democracy — making the judiciary more efficient, combating corruption, or cleaning up the electoral process.” Moreover, the two authors observe that those who denounce such legal threats to democracy are often “dismissed as exaggerating or
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus in the Legislative Yuan has made an internal decision to freeze NT$1.8 billion (US$54.7 million) of the indigenous submarine project’s NT$2 billion budget. This means that up to 90 percent of the budget cannot be utilized. It would only be accessible if the legislature agrees to lift the freeze sometime in the future. However, for Taiwan to construct its own submarines, it must rely on foreign support for several key pieces of equipment and technology. These foreign supporters would also be forced to endure significant pressure, infiltration and influence from Beijing. In other words,
“I compare the Communist Party to my mother,” sings a student at a boarding school in a Tibetan region of China’s Qinghai province. “If faith has a color,” others at a different school sing, “it would surely be Chinese red.” In a major story for the New York Times this month, Chris Buckley wrote about the forced placement of hundreds of thousands of Tibetan children in boarding schools, where many suffer physical and psychological abuse. Separating these children from their families, the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) aims to substitute itself for their parents and for their religion. Buckley’s reporting is
Last week, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), together holding more than half of the legislative seats, cut about NT$94 billion (US$2.85 billion) from the yearly budget. The cuts include 60 percent of the government’s advertising budget, 10 percent of administrative expenses, 3 percent of the military budget, and 60 percent of the international travel, overseas education and training allowances. In addition, the two parties have proposed freezing the budgets of many ministries and departments, including NT$1.8 billion from the Ministry of National Defense’s Indigenous Defense Submarine program — 90 percent of the program’s proposed
RSS