In addressing the issue of workplace bullying, Taiwan’s response has been that of a rational and civilized society. However, China’s frequent use of political and military intimidation to prevent Taiwan from becoming a normal country are threats far worse than bullying — why then, do some political parties swallow this humiliation?
Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) — who served two terms as Taipei’s mayor — and current Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) have both behaved courteously in the face of humiliation during the Taipei-Shanghai Twin-City Forum.
As mayor, Ko insisted on holding the forum despite opposition. Many big bosses scrambled to get a table at the forum, and many have been revealed to be on the list of people involved in Ko’s corruption scandal.
Chiang claims to be a proud member of the family of former presidents Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) and Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國), yet he holds no regard for his great grandfather’s and grandfather’s anti-communist spirit. Prior to his election, Chiang Wan-an insisted that the forum would not be held if the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) continued its military harassment of Taiwan — but he went back on his word and held the event. He even accepted the unequal condition that the forum would only be attended by Shanghai Vice Mayor Hua Yuan (華源). Chiang clearly deceived voters.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) sees Taiwan’s Republic of China (ROC) as a remnant of China — a fragment of its regime that fled to Taiwan — and seeks to eliminate it swiftly. The ROC is no longer under the control of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), but the KMT still intentionally views the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) — a party that came to power through a fair, democratic process — with more hostility than the CCP. This explains why the KMT reacts strongly to domestic workplace bullying, but disregards China’s incessant bullying of Taiwan.
Throughout the Twin-City Forum, neither Ko nor Chiang treated Taiwan with the dignity of an equal sovereign nation — instead, they subordinated themselves to a country that wishes to annex Taiwan. They prioritized their relationship with the People’s Republic of China while harboring animosity toward the ruling DPP, thereby failing to cherish the value of Taiwan’s democratization.
The Taipei side of the Twin-City Forum insists that there are benefits to exchanges. However, since the forum’s inception, it has failed to truly improve or promote the foundational cross-strait relationship via the two cities. Instead, it has become a tool for China’s “united front” propaganda efforts against Taiwan, while Taipei continues to submit to and flatter Shanghai. With the goal of annexation, China continues its military threats toward Taiwan. China is entirely ill-intentioned, and the forum serves as nothing but a political facade — an echo of Taipei’s placation in the face of China’s bullying.
In response to China’s harassment, Taiwan must adopt the attitude of a normal country — only when it respects itself can it expect to earn the respect of others. The fight against harassment should not be limited to discussions about workplace bullying. Politicians must also take a firm stance against China’s persistent bullying of Taiwan.
Chiang broke his pre-election promises, washing his hands clean of his father and grandfather. These anti-Taiwan political parties are welcoming China’s harassment.
Lee Min-yung is a poet.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In a stark reminder of China’s persistent territorial overreach, Pema Wangjom Thongdok, a woman from Arunachal Pradesh holding an Indian passport, was detained for 18 hours at Shanghai Pudong Airport on Nov. 24 last year. Chinese immigration officials allegedly informed her that her passport was “invalid” because she was “Chinese,” refusing to recognize her Indian citizenship and claiming Arunachal Pradesh as part of South Tibet. Officials had insisted that Thongdok, an Indian-origin UK resident traveling for a conference, was not Indian despite her valid documents. India lodged a strong diplomatic protest, summoning the Chinese charge d’affaires in Delhi and demanding
Immediately after the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) “Justice Mission” exercise at the end of last year, a question was posed to Indian Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal regarding recent developments involving the exercises around Taiwan, and how he viewed their impact on regional peace and stability. His answer was somewhat perplexing to me as a curious student of Taiwanese affairs. “India closely follows developments across the Indo-Pacific region,” he said, adding: “We have an abiding interest in peace and stability in the region, in view of our significant trade, economic, people-to-people, and maritime interests. We urge all concerned
In the past 72 hours, US Senators Roger Wicker, Dan Sullivan and Ruben Gallego took to social media to publicly rebuke the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the defense budget. I understand that Taiwan’s head is on the chopping block, and the urgency of its security situation cannot be overstated. However, the comments from Wicker, Sullivan and Gallego suggest they have fallen victim to a sophisticated disinformation campaign orchestrated by an administration in Taipei that treats national security as a partisan weapon. The narrative fed to our allies claims the opposition is slashing the defense budget to kowtow to the Chinese
In a Taipei Times editorial published almost three years ago (“Macron goes off-piste,” April 13, 2023, page 8), French President Emmanuel Macron was criticized for comments he made immediately after meeting Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing. Macron had spoken of the need for his country to find a path on Chinese foreign policy no longer aligned with that of the US, saying that continuing to follow the US agenda would sacrifice the EU’s strategic autonomy. At the time, Macron was criticized for gifting Xi a PR coup, and the editorial said that he had been “persuaded to run
RSS