In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.”
Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?”
According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning, and later colonized by the Qing Dynasty, means that Taiwan belongs to China. Following that logic, the Netherlands should actually be considered Taiwan’s true “motherland.” After all, it was the first foreign power to colonize Taiwan.
Additionally, Tungning was an entirely independent kingdom, and the Qing Dynasty was not even ruled by Han Chinese — neither regime referred to itself as “China.”
No matter how far the argument is stretched, Taiwan is not — and never has been — a part of the People’s Republic of China.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party are a band of ruffians whose only goal is to gain political power. They have no regard for human rights, freedom or democracy — only autocratic dictatorship.
Who in their right mind would want China to be their “motherland?” Why not ask Singaporeans if they would be willing?
China’s actions have led many people to be ashamed of their Chinese heritage. In Taiwan, only the KMT “yearns” for its “motherland,” China — but ask its members to become citizens of China and they would firmly refuse.
Taiwanese do not want to be ruled by China, yet these pro-China KMT legislators continue with their antics, throwing Taiwan into chaos. Perhaps they are the ones who deserve a “good beating.”
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS