In response to a failure to understand the “good intentions” behind the use of the term “motherland,” a professor from China’s Fudan University recklessly claimed that Taiwan used to be a colony, so all it needs is a “good beating.”
Such logic is risible. The Central Plains people in China were once colonized by the Mongolians, the Manchus and other foreign peoples — does that mean they also deserve a “good beating?”
According to the professor, having been ruled by the Cheng Dynasty — named after its founder, Ming-loyalist Cheng Cheng-kung (鄭成功, also known as Koxinga) — as the Kingdom of Tungning, and later colonized by the Qing Dynasty, means that Taiwan belongs to China. Following that logic, the Netherlands should actually be considered Taiwan’s true “motherland.” After all, it was the first foreign power to colonize Taiwan.
Additionally, Tungning was an entirely independent kingdom, and the Qing Dynasty was not even ruled by Han Chinese — neither regime referred to itself as “China.”
No matter how far the argument is stretched, Taiwan is not — and never has been — a part of the People’s Republic of China.
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Chinese Communist Party are a band of ruffians whose only goal is to gain political power. They have no regard for human rights, freedom or democracy — only autocratic dictatorship.
Who in their right mind would want China to be their “motherland?” Why not ask Singaporeans if they would be willing?
China’s actions have led many people to be ashamed of their Chinese heritage. In Taiwan, only the KMT “yearns” for its “motherland,” China — but ask its members to become citizens of China and they would firmly refuse.
Taiwanese do not want to be ruled by China, yet these pro-China KMT legislators continue with their antics, throwing Taiwan into chaos. Perhaps they are the ones who deserve a “good beating.”
Teng Hon-yuan is a university professor.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
Former Taipei mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) founding chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) was sentenced to 17 years in prison on Thursday, making headlines across major media. However, another case linked to the TPP — the indictment of Chinese immigrant Xu Chunying (徐春鶯) for alleged violations of the Anti-Infiltration Act (反滲透法) on Tuesday — has also stirred up heated discussions. Born in Shanghai, Xu became a resident of Taiwan through marriage in 1993. Currently the director of the Taiwan New Immigrant Development Association, she was elected to serve as legislator-at-large for the TPP in 2023, but was later charged with involvement
Out of 64 participating universities in this year’s Stars Program — through which schools directly recommend their top students to universities for admission — only 19 filled their admissions quotas. There were 922 vacancies, down more than 200 from last year; top universities had 37 unfilled places, 40 fewer than last year. The original purpose of the Stars Program was to expand admissions to a wider range of students. However, certain departments at elite universities that failed to meet their admissions quotas are not improving. Vacancies at top universities are linked to students’ program preferences on their applications, but inappropriate admission
RSS