On Nov. 9, Indonesia and China released a joint statement on advancing their strategic partnership during Indonesian President Prabowo Subianto’s visit to China. Both countries agreed to cooperate to become leaders of the global south.
In the document, China and Indonesia present themselves as “major developing countries and significant players” in the global south, signaling their aim to lead and offer an alternative to the global system. They uphold China’s Five Principles of Peaceful Coexistence and the Bandung Spirit as vital norms for international relations, emphasizing sovereignty, non-intervention, equality, mutual benefit and peaceful coexistence — values that align with the aspirations of many in the global south.
Indonesia’s aspiration to lead the global south has deep roots, illustrated by the Asia-Africa Conference in 1955 and first Indonesian president Sukarno’s New Emerging Forces policy in the 1960s. In Southeast Asia, it positions itself as the leader of ASEAN. This enduring ambition is evident in the Indonesia-China joint statement.
Indonesia’s domestic obstacles challenge Jakarta and Beijing’s cooperation in fulfilling this ambition. Its experiences of being colonized by external powers have made Indonesia forever suspicious toward foreign powers, making it keep its distance from them. This is expressed in Indonesia’s foreign policy principle of bebas dan aktif (free and active), which obliges it to maintain its autonomy. Consequently, sovereignty and non-intervention become the basic norms of Indonesia’s foreign policy. This is the reason behind Indonesia’s ambiguity.
Indonesian elites see China’s rise as an opportunity that could balance US dominance in global politics. However, they also view China as a long-term threat, identifying it as the primary external challenge that must be managed. There are fears that China could threaten Indonesia’s autonomy.
This year’s State of Southeast Asia report by the Yusof Ishak Institute in Singapore shows that opinions remain unchanged: 43 percent of Indonesian elites welcome China’s increasing political and strategic influence in the country, while 57 percent express concerns about this influence. Indonesia recognizes the need to balance its relations with China by fostering cooperation with the US to help mitigate China’s influence. Indonesia agreed to receive US$3 million from the US to fund a maritime training center in Batam.
Indonesia uses its relationship with China to limit US influence in the country, because it is also concerned about Washington. The Yusof Ishak Institute survey demonstrates that 72.6 percent of Indonesian elites are worried about the US’ influence in Indonesia. Indonesia strengthened economic cooperation with China by joining its Belt and Road Initiatives and the China-led Asian Infrastructure Investment Bank. This hedging strategy allows Indonesia to maintain a distance from any foreign power.
This cautious foreign policy aims to maintain Indonesia’s autonomy and overcome its suspicions toward foreign powers. Hence, it is not easy for the nation to build strong bilateral cooperation with other countries to reach a common goal, such as cooperating with China to become leaders of the global south. Additionally, Prabowo has reiterated Indonesia’s commitment to its bebas dan aktif stance during his visit to Beijing last month. Considering this, influential Indonesian leaders have encouraged him to leverage this foreign policy approach throughout his presidency.
Wendy A. Prajuli is a doctoral student at the Institut fur Asien- und Afrikawissenschaften at the Humboldt University of Berlin. Sukmawani Bela Pertiwi is a lecturer in the Department of International Relations at Binus University in Indonesia.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization
RSS