Taiwan is unparalleled in semiconductor manufacturing, and the country’s major chipmakers are among the most sought-after investors in the latest global trend of building local chip supply chains amid escalating US-China trade frictions and geopolitical risks. However, Taiwan has long lagged rivals in developing chip manufacturing equipment in a market dominated by US, European and Japanese companies.
Taiwan is the world’s largest supplier of foundry services with a market share of more than 75 percent and also the No. 1 supplier of chip packaging and testing services.
However, the nation’s chip companies source most manufacturing tools from foreign semiconductor equipment suppliers such as Applied Materials Inc, ASML Holding NV and Tokyo Electron Ltd.
Only 1 percent of front-end chip manufacturing equipment used by local chipmakers is made by Taiwanese companies despite the government’s decade-long push to build a semiconductor manufacturing equipment supply chain.
It is understandable that semiconductor firms are reluctant to take risks and adopt locally developed equipment, as any delay in rolling out next-generation technology is a matter of life or death for them.
In addition, lukewarm government support has had an effect on the slow uptake of Taiwan-made components. Some analysts believe that it would take 30 years for local semiconductor equipment makers to catch up with their Japanese rivals.
With Taiwan ascending to center stage in the semiconductor industry over the past few years and playing a key role in enabling artificial intelligence (AI) applications worldwide, there would never be an optimal time for the nation to strengthen its semiconductor equipment supply chain.
However, it is already happening to the nation’s chip packaging segment. That Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) is racing to produce AI chips to catch up with rapidly growing demand helps boost demand for locally made equipment for chip-on-wafer-on-silicon (CoWoS) packaging technology. The adoption rate of locally made chip packaging tools has increased to 15 percent.
CoWoS equipment suppliers from All Ring Technology Co and Grand Process Technology Corp to Gallant Micro Machining Co are enjoying strong revenue growth. All Ring’s profits ballooned to NT$895 million (US$27.6 million) in the first three quarters of this year from NT$72 million in the same period last year. Earnings per share skyrocketed to NT$10.3 from NT$0.9.
However, only a few local firms can enjoy the growth of chip manufacturing business, given most local companies are small and have meager financial resources for research and development (R&D).
To address those problems, the Taiwan Electronic Equipment Industry Association on Friday last week urged the government to provide more assistance. The government’s latest tax incentives are appealing to large-scale companies with a high threshold of NT$6 billion in R&D investment. The association said the government should relax restrictions on tax incentives for R&D investment and push for more collaboration with research institutions.
It also called on the government to help small and medium-sized businesses gain better access to overseas markets.
The semiconductor equipment industry has a good business outlook, as about half of the nation’s electronic equipment production would come from such tools by 2028, up from 34 percent this year, the association said.
The adoption rate of locally developed tools has moved at a snail’s pace over the past 10 years. Therefore, the government should consider taking the association’s advice and better support local suppliers to grasp business opportunities stemming from emerging technologies such as AI.
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of