Today is the anniversary of the adoption of the UN Genocide Convention. Seventy-six years later, we are witnessing a genocide in our times.
In the 1940s, Polish Jewish lawyer Raphael Lemkin coined the word “genocide” to serve as an emergency alarm to mobilize the world to prevent an irrevocable loss to humanity. Lemkin, a Holocaust survivor, advocated for the Genocide Convention.
Last week, Amnesty International released a report concluding that Israel is committing genocide against the Palestinians. It examined more than 200 interviews with people on the ground, photographic and satellite imagery, 100 statements by Israeli authorities, and verified reports. It reviewed jurisprudence from international courts and consulted international law experts.
Intent to destroy a distinct group of people is the hardest requirement in the Genocide Convention to prove. Amnesty determined Israel met this criteria in statements by state officials and its conduct over decades.
Direct statements by Israeli officials have called for indiscriminate attacks, the annihilation of the Gaza Strip, denial of humanitarian aid, forcible transfers of civilians and Israeli settlement expansion into Gaza.
Patterns of conduct show an unprecedented scale and speed in the killing of civilians and the destruction of civilian infrastructure. Explosives that impact wide areas have been dropped on densely populated neighborhoods, hardly a precise targeting of Hamas militants. Amnesty examined 15 airstrikes, a fraction of the attacks, and found no legitimate military targets. Cultural property and agricultural land have been destroyed. Evidence of an unlivable, razed urban landscape is plain to see in aerial and satellite imagery. These actions against non-military targets show acts of genocide.
Amnesty’s report is not slander against Israel. It is a measured analysis and critique of a state’s policies and actions. It is a call for Israel to be treated as the recognized state that it is in the international community. Even a state built on past traumas, which has also experienced recent trauma, has no excuse to inflict further crimes against humanity.
Israel wants people to focus on its right to self-defense. Amnesty has condemned the killing of civilians in southern Israel on Oct. 7 last year and the taking of hostages as war crimes and violations of international law. What is missing, though, is context. Israel has unlawfully occupied the Palestinian Territories for 57 years, illegally blockaded Gaza for 17 years and has maintained an apartheid system. Israel’s impunity and dehumanization of the Palestinians have paved the path to genocide.
Nations are obligated to respond to the alarm of genocide. No country has failed more grandly than my own, the US. Rather than stopping the inhumanity, it has provided a stream of weapons and diplomatic cover. Americans must push Washington to change course.
Taiwan must also play a part, even as a non-member of the UN. Taiwan is engaged with many global issues. However, rather than express concern for the decimation of Gaza to its Israeli counterparts, Taiwanese officials have kept quiet and have deepened ties. This year, Taiwan signed technology, trade and cultural agreements with Israel while echoing Israel’s messages that it is the leader of freedom and democracy in its region. Would Taiwan look back with regret that it failed to join the global outcry to stop a genocide? It is not too late to live up to its image as a country that speaks up for human rights.
Read Amnesty’s report on amnesty.org, sign the petition and ask your government representatives to speak up. Lemkin’s alarm has been sounded. It is our duty to heed this historic call.
Laura Moye is a volunteer Israel and the Occupied Palestinian Territories coordinator of Amnesty International Taiwan based in Taichung.
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
On Wednesday last week, the Rossiyskaya Gazeta published an article by Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) asserting the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) territorial claim over Taiwan effective 1945, predicated upon instruments such as the 1943 Cairo Declaration and the 1945 Potsdam Proclamation. The article further contended that this de jure and de facto status was subsequently reaffirmed by UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 of 1971. The Ministry of Foreign Affairs promptly issued a statement categorically repudiating these assertions. In addition to the reasons put forward by the ministry, I believe that China’s assertions are open to questions in international
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
RSS