Political violence is nothing new in the Philippines. It was, after all, the site of the world’s worst massacre of media workers when 58 people, including 32 journalists, were murdered in 2009 while traveling in an election convoy on the southern island of Mindanao.
The powerful Ampatuan clan had pre-dug a vast grave in preparation for the cars carrying relatives of their rival, former Buluan vice mayor Esmael Mangudadatu, to arrive at a police checkpoint. Heavily armed gunmen intercepted the motorcade, killing then burying them all.
I was on Mindanao soon after as part of a team of press freedom groups, including the Committee to Protect Journalists and the International Federation of Journalists, that examined the killings: It was a chilling scene. There has been a steady stream of local assassinations and kidnappings ever since, and plenty beforehand, too.
So when Philippine Vice President Sara Duterte — daughter of former Philippine president Rodrigo Duterte — released a bizarre video on Nov. 23 telling Philippine President Ferdinand Marcos Jr she would have him assassinated if someone did the same to her, many rolled their eyes and prepared for another round of hostilities.
The influential media site Rappler was first to draw the similarities: “Sara Duterte unleashes the Ampatuan within,” its headline read, noting her video was released on the 15th anniversary of the massacre.
Duterte announced her resignation from Marcos’ cabinet in June, while remaining vice president, highlighting the extent of the fallout between the two families. Since then, she has been escalating her criticisms of the president, threatening to exhume his father’s remains and throw them in the sea, and saying that she imagined beheading him. Duterte also alleged, as others have before her, that the Marcos family plotted the assassination of former Philippine senator Benigno Aquino — a member of another large political dynasty — in 1983.
For his part, Marcos has tightened his security and said: “Such criminal attempts should not be ignored,” while the Philippine National Bureau of Investigation issued a subpoena to Duterte. After all, she might have downplayed her remarks, but it is hard to ignore her repeated thoughts of violence about the president.
A government panel postponed its Friday hearing into allegations Duterte misused public funds, claims she has denied, to allow her to answer the subpoena instead.
So what happens now? The nation’s mid-term elections are due next year and Rodrigo Duterte has filed his candidacy for mayor of Davao on the island of Mindanao — a position that he has held before, and one the clan has controlled for three decades. His two sons are also planning to run for the Philippine Senate. Of course Marcos himself is in the family business: He is the son of former dictator Ferdinand Marcos, known for his rampant corruption and deadly political repression, while his sister, Imee, is a senator, his son is a congressman and his cousin is house speaker. It is dynastic politics run wild, and unless it is contained, this feud would set the Philippines on another course of instability at the worst possible time — it is dealing with daily threats from China in the South China Sea and facing the uncertainty that comes with US president-elect Donald Trump in the White House.
The political marriage of convenience between the rival clans forged during the 2022 elections that brought Marcos to power was never going to last. Things deteriorated quickly when the Philippine House of Representatives began hearings in August to examine Rodrigo Duterte’s deadly drug war, along with his daughter’s actions as head of the Philippine Department of Education.
There are other pressures, too: The International Criminal Court (ICC) is also investigating Rodrigo Duterte’s campaign of extrajudicial killings during his term as president from 2016 to 2022 that left more than 6,000 dead. Human rights groups such as Amnesty International say the toll could be as high as 30,000.
Although Marcos has said he does not support an outside investigation, it no doubt sent a chill through the Duterte clan when his executive secretary announced that if ICC refers the process to Interpol and requests the Philippines’ help, it would receive full cooperation.
All that domestic drama would be troubling the Philippines’ allies and partners — particularly the US, Japan and Australia — which have been steadfast in their support for Marcos’ policy of pushing back against China’s hostile actions in the South China Sea, where more than US$3 trillion in goods pass through every year. When he took office, Marcos steered the nation away from his predecessor’s soft approach to Beijing, granting the US military access to more bases, increasing naval missions in the disputed waterway and widely publicizing violent attacks on its vessels by the Chinese Coast Guard.
Earlier this month, the president signed two laws to strengthen the Philippines’ maritime claims, including one that creates a system for foreign vessels and aircraft to exercise the right of passage through its waters and airspace. Beijing, which lays claim to most of the South China Sea, strongly condemned the move.
Manila cannot afford to be distracted by this latest round of clan rivalry and violence threats. Trump has appointed two China hawks in key roles in his new cabinet: US Senator Marco Rubio is in line for secretary of state, while US Representative Mike Waltz is tipped to be national security advisor. That means US and China relations are set for another rocky period, and one where its treaty allies, such as the Philippines, would be expected to continue with their own tough stance against Beijing.
Marcos has managed the drama well so far, but he needs to get his house in order. As jaw-droppingly unhinged as Philippine politics can be, there are larger issues at stake — and powerful allies to keep happy.
Ruth Pollard is a Bloomberg Opinion managing editor. Previously she was South and Southeast Asia government team leader at Bloomberg News and Middle East correspondent for the Sydney Morning Herald.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Taiwan’s higher education system is facing an existential crisis. As the demographic drop-off continues to empty classrooms, universities across the island are locked in a desperate battle for survival, international student recruitment and crucial Ministry of Education funding. To win this battle, institutions have turned to what seems like an objective measure of quality: global university rankings. Unfortunately, this chase is a costly illusion, and taxpayers are footing the bill. In the past few years, the goalposts have shifted from pure research output to “sustainability” and “societal impact,” largely driven by commercial metrics such as the UK-based Times Higher Education (THE) Impact
The inter-Korean relationship, long defined by national division, offers the clearest mirror within East Asia for cross-strait relations. Yet even there, reunification language is breaking down. The South Korean government disclosed on Wednesday last week that North Korea’s constitutional revision in March had deleted references to reunification and added a territorial clause defining its border with South Korea. South Korea is also seriously debating whether national reunification with North Korea is still necessary. On April 27, South Korean President Lee Jae-myung marked the eighth anniversary of the Panmunjom Declaration, the 2018 inter-Korean agreement in which the two Koreas pledged to
RSS