The licensing of medical professionals with overseas degrees has again aroused heated debate, and many dentists held a protest in Taipei on Nov. 24.
The controversy stemmed from an amendment to the Physicians’ Act (醫師法) in 2001 allowing people who studied overseas to be qualified to take the first stage of the two-stage national medical licensing exam.
As more countries joined the EU after the passing of the amendment, overseas study agencies have advertised English-language medical programs in Europe, targeting people who could not qualify for local medical schools.
Examination Yuan data showed that, from the late 2000s, the number of Taiwanese who studied overseas and applied for the national medical licensing exam has increased consistently, especially those who studied in Spain, the Czech Republic, Hungary and Poland. As a result, many called them “Popo doctors/dentists” (波波醫生), which became a pejorative term.
In Taiwan, only the top 1 percent of students who take the national university entrance exam are eligible to enter domestic medical schools, and they usually take the first stage of the licensing exam during their school years, followed by an internship and the second stage of the exam.
The differences in qualification and allegedly in training among local and overseas graduates triggered a protest on May 31, 2009. About 2,000 doctors and local medical students demanded that the law be revised to limit overseas graduates’ participation in the licensing exam.
The Physicians’ Act was amended in 2022, requiring overseas graduates to pass a foreign degree evaluation test by the Ministry of Education to qualify for the first stage of the national licensing exam.
The Ministry of Health and Welfare (MOHW) last year announced a draft act that would allow an unspecified number of overseas dentistry graduates who have passed the first stage of the licensing exam to enroll in internships, which some locally trained dentists and students described as “opening a backdoor” to the field for overseas graduates.
At the same time, they opposed the MOHW’s NT$2.4 billion (US$73.94 million) plan for the second phase of a rural healthcare improvement program, which starts this year, allowing overseas dentistry graduates to apply for internships.
Their discontent resurfaced this month, after a court sentenced an obstetrician who had studied overseas to imprisonment for negligence causing death.
Amid public concerns, a list of hundreds of doctors who had studied abroad was leaked to the Internet. Local Chinese-language media reported that 41 of 69 graduates of a medical program in Poland in 2021 were Taiwanese and questioned their qualifications. Many people also called it “unfair,” saying many overseas graduates have physician parents or wealthy families.
After the Nov. 24 protest, the MOHW agreed to cap the internship quota of overseas dentistry graduates at 50 per year, tighten the qualifications for the foreign degree assessment and national medical licensing exam, and accept only local dental graduates to 55 rural areas in its healthcare program.
However, a local dentist alliance said that “our revolution has not yet succeeded” and demanded that the MOHW come up with “better solutions.”
On the other hand, a group of overseas graduates urged local dentists not to disparage or harass them.
Local doctors have suggested solutions such as increasing the cap for local medicine and dentistry departments, but the problem of hundreds of overseas graduates seeking a pathway to obtaining a medical license remains unsolved.
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
For Taiwan, the ongoing US and Israeli strikes on Iranian targets are a warning signal: When a major power stretches the boundaries of self-defense, smaller states feel the tremors first. Taiwan’s security rests on two pillars: US deterrence and the credibility of international law. The first deters coercion from China. The second legitimizes Taiwan’s place in the international community. One is material. The other is moral. Both are indispensable. Under the UN Charter, force is lawful only in response to an armed attack or with UN Security Council authorization. Even pre-emptive self-defense — long debated — requires a demonstrably imminent
Since being re-elected, US President Donald Trump has consistently taken concrete action to counter China and to safeguard the interests of the US and other democratic nations. The attacks on Iran, the earlier capture of deposed of Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro and efforts to remove Chinese influence from the Panama Canal all demonstrate that, as tensions with Beijing intensify, Washington has adopted a hardline stance aimed at weakening its power. Iran and Venezuela are important allies and major oil suppliers of China, and the US has effectively decapitated both. The US has continuously strengthened its military presence in the Philippines. Japanese Prime
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily