Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation’s Premier12 championship is a wonderful moment for the country and a reminder of the power of sports to bring people together and instill public pride in the nation.
Taiwan is in a golden age of soft power and international visibility. Taiwan’s baseball heroes joining the nation’s democracy and LGBTQ+ rights movements, former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) internationally renowned leadership and now diplomatic role, the nation’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, its semiconductor and advanced technology industries, and Nymphia Wind (妮妃雅), the pride of Taiwan’s queer community, who won US reality show RuPaul’s Drag Race in April, are all manifesting Taiwan’s spirit and values on the world stage.
It is a reminder that when Taiwan is given an opportunity to express itself, it makes a warm and positive contribution to the world.
Baseball is one of the few things that can unite Taiwanese across the political divide, allowing people to find common ground in support of a shared passion. However, while the whole nation came together in supporting the team, the messages of congratulations from politicians — “Team Taiwan” or “Team Chinese Taipei” — brought to the fore hidden fractures, revealing the polarized national vision of the two sides.
Introduced to Taiwan by Japan during the colonial era, the sport was strategically embraced by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) as a vehicle to promote its version of Chinese nationalism. Taiwan’s domination of Little League Baseball — winning 17 championships in less than 30 years from the 1960s through the 1990s — was linked to strong interventions by the KMT, which helped the regime maintain its ideological legitimacy at home and abroad as the “real China,” Fu Jen Catholic University adjunct assistant professor of sociology Daniel Yu-Kuei Sun (孫又揆) wrote on the topic.
However, with democratization in the 1990s and the KMT no longer the only powerful party, the meaning of the sport has changed, and it is now an important symbol of Taiwanese identity. In recent years, “Team Taiwan” has become the go-to phrase for Taiwanese to support their team in international competitions, a symbolic assertion of identity against the “Chinese Taipei” strictures imposed by geopolitical attempts to sideline the nation.
However, despite the ideology of Chinese nationalism giving way to a Taiwanese identity in the public sphere, KMT politicians are still wedded to that earlier ideology. In sending their congratulations to the team after their victory, Democratic Progressive Party politicians used the term “Team Taiwan,” while KMT mayors, lawmakers and mainstream politicians used the term “Chinese Taipei,” drawing mockery online.
This usage has not only brought to the fore the nation’s political fractures, but also brought into sharp relief the KMT’s modern identity crisis in clinging to an outdated China ideology that views Taiwan as a part of a larger Chinese whole, while seeking to govern a Taiwanese electorate that views their nation as independent.
However, one leading KMT politician did use “Team Taiwan” in his message of congratulations — Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) — suggesting that he has his sights set on a higher political office. In democratic Taiwan, KMT politicians have had to show flexibility to stay electorally competitive, with ambitious political entrepreneurs de-emphasizing their China ideology while burnishing their Taiwanese bona fides when seeking to be elected president. That includes, among others, “new Taiwanese” former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), also a former Taipei mayor.
George Santayana wrote: “Those who cannot remember the past are condemned to repeat it.” This article will help readers avoid repeating mistakes by examining four examples from the civil war between the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) forces and the Republic of China (ROC) forces that involved two city sieges and two island invasions. The city sieges compared are Changchun (May to October 1948) and Beiping (November 1948 to January 1949, renamed Beijing after its capture), and attempts to invade Kinmen (October 1949) and Hainan (April 1950). Comparing and contrasting these examples, we can learn how Taiwan may prevent a war with
A recent trio of opinion articles in this newspaper reflects the growing anxiety surrounding Washington’s reported request for Taiwan to shift up to 50 percent of its semiconductor production abroad — a process likely to take 10 years, even under the most serious and coordinated effort. Simon H. Tang (湯先鈍) issued a sharp warning (“US trade threatens silicon shield,” Oct. 4, page 8), calling the move a threat to Taiwan’s “silicon shield,” which he argues deters aggression by making Taiwan indispensable. On the same day, Hsiao Hsi-huei (蕭錫惠) (“Responding to US semiconductor policy shift,” Oct. 4, page 8) focused on
Taiwan is rapidly accelerating toward becoming a “super-aged society” — moving at one of the fastest rates globally — with the proportion of elderly people in the population sharply rising. While the demographic shift of “fewer births than deaths” is no longer an anomaly, the nation’s legal framework and social customs appear stuck in the last century. Without adjustments, incidents like last month’s viral kicking incident on the Taipei MRT involving a 73-year-old woman would continue to proliferate, sowing seeds of generational distrust and conflict. The Senior Citizens Welfare Act (老人福利法), originally enacted in 1980 and revised multiple times, positions older
Nvidia Corp’s plan to build its new headquarters at the Beitou Shilin Science Park’s T17 and T18 plots has stalled over a land rights dispute, prompting the Taipei City Government to propose the T12 plot as an alternative. The city government has also increased pressure on Shin Kong Life Insurance Co, which holds the development rights for the T17 and T18 plots. The proposal is the latest by the city government over the past few months — and part of an ongoing negotiation strategy between the two sides. Whether Shin Kong Life Insurance backs down might be the key factor