Taiwan’s victory in the World Baseball Softball Confederation’s Premier12 championship is a wonderful moment for the country and a reminder of the power of sports to bring people together and instill public pride in the nation.
Taiwan is in a golden age of soft power and international visibility. Taiwan’s baseball heroes joining the nation’s democracy and LGBTQ+ rights movements, former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) internationally renowned leadership and now diplomatic role, the nation’s handling of the COVID-19 pandemic, its semiconductor and advanced technology industries, and Nymphia Wind (妮妃雅), the pride of Taiwan’s queer community, who won US reality show RuPaul’s Drag Race in April, are all manifesting Taiwan’s spirit and values on the world stage.
It is a reminder that when Taiwan is given an opportunity to express itself, it makes a warm and positive contribution to the world.
Baseball is one of the few things that can unite Taiwanese across the political divide, allowing people to find common ground in support of a shared passion. However, while the whole nation came together in supporting the team, the messages of congratulations from politicians — “Team Taiwan” or “Team Chinese Taipei” — brought to the fore hidden fractures, revealing the polarized national vision of the two sides.
Introduced to Taiwan by Japan during the colonial era, the sport was strategically embraced by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) as a vehicle to promote its version of Chinese nationalism. Taiwan’s domination of Little League Baseball — winning 17 championships in less than 30 years from the 1960s through the 1990s — was linked to strong interventions by the KMT, which helped the regime maintain its ideological legitimacy at home and abroad as the “real China,” Fu Jen Catholic University adjunct assistant professor of sociology Daniel Yu-Kuei Sun (孫又揆) wrote on the topic.
However, with democratization in the 1990s and the KMT no longer the only powerful party, the meaning of the sport has changed, and it is now an important symbol of Taiwanese identity. In recent years, “Team Taiwan” has become the go-to phrase for Taiwanese to support their team in international competitions, a symbolic assertion of identity against the “Chinese Taipei” strictures imposed by geopolitical attempts to sideline the nation.
However, despite the ideology of Chinese nationalism giving way to a Taiwanese identity in the public sphere, KMT politicians are still wedded to that earlier ideology. In sending their congratulations to the team after their victory, Democratic Progressive Party politicians used the term “Team Taiwan,” while KMT mayors, lawmakers and mainstream politicians used the term “Chinese Taipei,” drawing mockery online.
This usage has not only brought to the fore the nation’s political fractures, but also brought into sharp relief the KMT’s modern identity crisis in clinging to an outdated China ideology that views Taiwan as a part of a larger Chinese whole, while seeking to govern a Taiwanese electorate that views their nation as independent.
However, one leading KMT politician did use “Team Taiwan” in his message of congratulations — Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) — suggesting that he has his sights set on a higher political office. In democratic Taiwan, KMT politicians have had to show flexibility to stay electorally competitive, with ambitious political entrepreneurs de-emphasizing their China ideology while burnishing their Taiwanese bona fides when seeking to be elected president. That includes, among others, “new Taiwanese” former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九), also a former Taipei mayor.
A response to my article (“Invite ‘will-bes,’ not has-beens,” Aug. 12, page 8) mischaracterizes my arguments, as well as a speech by former British prime minister Boris Johnson at the Ketagalan Forum in Taipei early last month. Tseng Yueh-ying (曾月英) in the response (“A misreading of Johnson’s speech,” Aug. 24, page 8) does not dispute that Johnson referred repeatedly to Taiwan as “a segment of the Chinese population,” but asserts that the phrase challenged Beijing by questioning whether parts of “the Chinese population” could be “differently Chinese.” This is essentially a confirmation of Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formulation, which says that
“History does not repeat itself, but it rhymes” (attributed to Mark Twain). The USSR was the international bully during the Cold War as it sought to make the world safe for Soviet-style Communism. China is now the global bully as it applies economic power and invests in Mao’s (毛澤東) magic weapons (the People’s Liberation Army [PLA], the United Front Work Department, and the Chinese Communist Party [CCP]) to achieve world domination. Freedom-loving countries must respond to the People’s Republic of China (PRC), especially in the Indo-Pacific (IP), as resolutely as they did against the USSR. In 1954, the US and its allies
Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi arrived in China yesterday, where he is to attend a summit of the Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and Russian President Vladimir Putin today. As this coincides with the 50 percent US tariff levied on Indian products, some Western news media have suggested that Modi is moving away from the US, and into the arms of China and Russia. Taiwan-Asia Exchange Foundation fellow Sana Hashmi in a Taipei Times article published yesterday titled “Myths around Modi’s China visit” said that those analyses have misrepresented India’s strategic calculations, and attempted to view
When Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) stood in front of the Potala Palace in Lhasa on Thursday last week, flanked by Chinese flags, synchronized schoolchildren and armed Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) troops, he was not just celebrating the 60th anniversary of the establishment of the “Tibet Autonomous Region,” he was making a calculated declaration: Tibet is China. It always has been. Case closed. Except it has not. The case remains wide open — not just in the hearts of Tibetans, but in history records. For decades, Beijing has insisted that Tibet has “always been part of China.” It is a phrase