As the International Rescue Committee (IRC) copes with dramatic increases in displaced people in the past few years, the refugee aid organization has sought efficiencies wherever it can — including using artificial intelligence (AI).
Since 2015, the IRC has invested in Signpost — a portfolio of mobile apps and social media channels that answer questions in different languages for people in dangerous situations. The Signpost project, which includes many other organizations, has reached 18 million people so far, but the IRC wants to significantly increase its reach by using AI tools — if it can do so safely.
Conflict, climate emergencies and economic hardship have driven up demand for humanitarian assistance, with more than 117 million people forcibly displaced this year, the Office of the UN High Commissioner for Refugees said.
Illustration: Mountain People
The turn to AI technologies is in part driven by the massive gap between needs and resources.
To meet its goal of reaching half of displaced people within three years, the IRC is testing a network of AI chatbots to see if it can increase the capacity of their humanitarian officers and the local organizations that directly serve people through Signpost.
For now, the pilot project operates in El Salvador, Kenya, Greece and Italy and responds in 11 languages. It draws on a combination of large language models from some of the biggest technology companies, including OpenAI, Anthropic and Google.
The chatbot response system also uses customer service software from Zendesk and receives other support from Google and Cisco Systems.
If it decides the tools work, the IRC wants to extend the technical infrastructure to other nonprofit humanitarian organizations at no cost. It hope to create shared technology resources that less technically focused organizations could use without having to negotiate directly with tech companies or manage the risks of deployment.
“We’re trying to really be clear about where the legitimate concerns are, but lean into the optimism of the opportunities and not also allow the populations we serve to be left behind in solutions that have the potential to scale in a way that human to human or other technology can’t,” IRC chief research and innovation officer Jeannie Annan said.
The responses and information that Signpost chatbots deliver are vetted by local organizations to be up to date and sensitive to the precarious circumstances people could be in.
An example query that the IRC shared is of a woman from El Salvador traveling through Mexico to the US with her son who is looking for shelter and services for her child. The bot provides a list of providers in the area where she is.
The IRC said it does not facilitate migration.
More complex or sensitive queries are escalated for humans to respond.
The most important potential downside of these tools would be that they do not work. For example, what if the situation on the ground changes and the chatbot does not know? It could provide information that is not just wrong, but dangerous.
A second issue is that the tools can amass a valuable honeypot of data about vulnerable people that hostile actors could target. What if a hacker succeeds in accessing data with personal information or if that data is accidentally shared with an oppressive government?
The IRC said it has agreed with the tech providers that none of their AI models would be trained on the data that the IRC, the local organizations or the people they are serving are generating. It has also worked to anonymize the data, including removing personal information and location.
As part of the Signpost.AI project, IRC is also testing tools such as a digital automated tutor and maps that can integrate many different types of data to help prepare for and respond to crises.
Cathy Petrozzino, who works for the not-for-profit research and development company MITRE, said AI tools do have high potential, but also high risks.
She said that to use the tools responsibly, organizations should ask themselves, does the technology work? Is it fair? Are data and privacy protected?
Organizations also need to convene a range of people to help govern and design the initiative — not just technical experts, but people with deep knowledge of the context, legal experts and representatives from the groups that would use the tools, she said.
“There are many good models sitting in the AI graveyard, because they weren’t worked out in conjunction and collaboration with the user community,” she said.
For any system that has potentially life-changing effects, groups should bring in outside experts to independently assess their methodologies, Petrozzino said.
Designers of AI tools need to consider the other systems it would interact with, and they need to plan to monitor the model over time, she said.
Consulting with displaced people or others that humanitarian organizations serve might increase the time and effort needed to design these tools, but not having their input raises many safety and ethical problems, CDAC Network executive director Helen McElhinney said.
It can also unlock local knowledge.
People receiving services from humanitarian organizations should be told if an AI model would analyze any information they hand over, even if the intention is to help the organization respond better, she said.
That requires meaningful and informed consent, she said.
They should also know if an AI model is making life-changing decisions about resource allocation and where accountability for those decisions lies, she said.
Degan Ali, CEO of Adeso, a nonprofit in Somalia and Kenya, has long been an advocate for changing the power dynamics in international development to give more money and control to local organizations.
She asked how the IRC and others pursuing these technologies would overcome access issues, citing the week-long power outages caused by Hurricane Helene in the US.
Chatbots would not help when there is no device, Internet or electricity, she said.
Ali also said that few local organizations have the capacity to attend big humanitarian conferences where the ethics of AI are debated.
Few have staff senior enough and knowledgeable enough to really engage with these discussions, although they understand the potential power and effect these technologies might have, she said.
“We must be extraordinarily careful not to replicate power imbalances and biases through technology,” Ali said. “The most complex questions are always going to require local, contextual and lived experience to answer in a meaningful way.”
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
On a quiet lane in Taipei’s central Daan District (大安), an otherwise unremarkable high-rise is marked by a police guard and a tawdry A4 printout from the Ministry of Foreign Affairs indicating an “embassy area.” Keen observers would see the emblem of the Holy See, one of Taiwan’s 12 so-called “diplomatic allies.” Unlike Taipei’s other embassies and quasi-consulates, no national flag flies there, nor is there a plaque indicating what country’s embassy this is. Visitors hoping to sign a condolence book for the late Pope Francis would instead have to visit the Italian Trade Office, adjacent to Taipei 101. The death of
As the highest elected official in the nation’s capital, Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) is the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) candidate-in-waiting for a presidential bid. With the exception of Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕), Chiang is the most likely KMT figure to take over the mantle of the party leadership. All the other usual suspects, from Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to New Taipei City Mayor Hou You-yi (侯友宜) to KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) have already been rejected at the ballot box. Given such high expectations, Chiang should be demonstrating resolve, calm-headedness and political wisdom in how he faces tough
RSS