US President Joe Biden and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Saturday last week held a face-to-face meeting on the sidelines of the APEC summit in Lima. Their dialogue has been widely interpreted as an effort by Xi to lay out China’s positions ahead of US president-elect Donald Trump taking office in two months. Chinese state media also reportedly misrepresented the meeting by claiming that Xi made an unprecedented mention of President William Lai (賴清德), a move that demonstrates China’s use of cognitive warfare tactics.
According to transcripts released by the White House and the Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Xi said: “China is ready to work with a new US administration to maintain communication, expand cooperation and manage differences, so as to strive for a steady transition of the China-US relationship.”
This statement signals Xi’s concern that Trump would provoke new trade wars and diplomatic upheaval between the two leading powers, and expressed his desire to reduce tensions.
However, Xi also restated four “red lines” that the US should not challenge: the Taiwan question, democracy and human rights, China’s path and system, and China’s development right in a warning to the incoming US president.
According to the Chinese readout, Xi also mentioned Taiwan’s president and the ruling Democratic Progress Party (DPP) by name, saying: “If the US side cared about maintaining peace across the Taiwan Strait, it is crucial that it sees clearly the true nature of Lai Ching-te and the DPP authorities in seeking Taiwan independence, handles the Taiwan question with extra prudence, unequivocally opposes Taiwan independence and supports China’s peaceful reunification.”
If Xi did mention Lai to Biden’s face, such a move would be in contrast to the tradition of Chinese leaders never directly mentioning the names of Taiwan’s leaders at international events.
Responding to an inquiry from Taiwan, US officials said that Xi did not mention any specific Taiwan leader or party during the meeting.
It has been a long-standing practice for the People’s Republic of China (PRC) to misrepresent the contents of international meetings as part of its cognitive warfare to downplay Taiwan and to mislead the international community. After a meeting in May between South Korean President Yoon Suk-yeol and the Chinese premier, Seoul said Beijing misreported that Yoon had said “South Korea adheres to the one China principle.” Yoon only said that he “respects” China’s principle, but that he remains opposed to “changing the status quo in the Taiwan Strait by force,” Seoul said.
After a meeting between the Japanese and Chinese foreign ministers in July, a Chinese news release mischaracterized then-Japanese minister of foreign affairs Yoko Kamikawa’s remarks as “Japan’s adherence to the one China principle.” She had oly expressed concern about China’s military activities and called for peace across the Taiwan Strait.
The most recent attempt — interjecting Lai’s name into the Biden-Xi meeting — was an attempt to cover up the fact that many leaders at the APEC summit have underlined the importance of peace in the Taiwan Strait. It also showed China’s intention to distract from its own role in fomenting instability in the Taiwan Strait by trying to shift the blame to Taiwan.
With China to host the 2026 APEC summit, member countries are concerned about its national security legislation and are worried it could breach the human rights of foreign attendees. However, China’s cognitive disinformation measures are more likely to be a greater challenge for APEC members and international attendees.
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
There is a peculiar kind of political theater unfolding in East Asia — one that would be laughable if its consequences were not so dangerous. Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on April 12 returned from Beijing, where she met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and spoke earnestly about preserving “peace” and maintaining the “status quo.” It is a position that sounds responsible, even prudent. It is also a fiction. Taiwan is, by any honest definition, an independent country. It governs itself, defends itself, elects its leaders, and functions as a free and sovereign democracy. Independence is not a
RSS