Teresa Ribera faces a formidable challenge. In September, Spain’s socialist deputy prime minister was tapped by European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen to take on the role of executive vice president for a clean, just, and competitive transition, placing her in charge of two critical policy areas: competition and climate action.
This is a vast and highly contested portfolio. On the competition side, Ribera is to inherit several landmark cases, including the EU’s effort to break up Google’s online-advertising monopoly — an outcome that could reshape the digital economy.
On the climate front, the European Green Deal has triggered mass protests from furious farmers who argue that environmental regulations are driving up costs and making their products less competitive. Ribera’s strong green credentials suggest that she might decide to focus on saving the Green Deal, potentially relegating competition policy, as a senior EU competition official quipped, to a mere “side dish.”
But Ribera does not have to choose between enforcing competition and climate action. As a recent report by the Open Markets Institute and other leading antimonopoly organizations explains, freeing Europe’s economy from the grip of tech monopolies is crucial to tackling the climate crisis and fostering green innovation.
Artificial intelligence (AI) is a case in point. In Barcelona, where I live, a severe drought limited households to 200 liters of water per day earlier this year. The recent floods which devastated Spain’s Mediterranean coast are the flip side of the same coin: We can expect more of these extremes in the coming years. However, even as climate-fueled droughts grow more frequent and intense, US tech giants are building massive data centers in Spain to support AI expansion. These facilities consume enormous and growing amounts of energy and water, yet big tech firms hide their environmental impact. One study, for example, suggests that their actual carbon dioxide emissions could be 662 percent higher than reported.
Big tech firms are not just draining Europe’s resources and straining the continent’s power grids; they also pose a direct threat to its economy. The data-center boom is part of a broader effort to monopolize digital infrastructure. Companies such as Alphabet (Google) and Meta (Facebook) know their current business models — which depend on addicting children, dividing societies and misusing personal data — are increasingly unpopular. That is why they are tightening their grip on a less visible yet essential part of the economy: infrastructure. Google, Microsoft and Amazon already control two-thirds of the world’s cloud infrastructure, and their share is growing rapidly.
Big tech’s monopoly power, more than any European law, undermines European tech firms’ ability to compete globally. Former European Central Bank president Mario Draghi warns in his report on EU competitiveness that the bloc risks missing out on the AI revolution unless it helps local firms thrive and compete. While industrial policy is vital to this effort, Europe’s tech industry cannot hope to challenge dominant firms like Google or Amazon in their current form. Because these giants control much of the world’s computing power and have amassed vast amounts of data, European AI firms are inexorably drawn into their orbit. Mistral AI, once touted as France’s AI national champion, illustrated this by partnering with Microsoft, which is also OpenAI’s largest investor.
Big tech’s outsize power impedes the development of smaller, less carbon-intensive AI models. Fortunately, Ribera has the tools to confront their dominance and force them to comply with EU law, and some progress has already been made. Just last month, the European Commission won a major legal victory when the European Court of Justice overturned a lower-court ruling, ordering Apple to pay 13 billion euros (US$13.7 billion) in back taxes to Ireland.
Contrary to the claims of industry lobbyists, the EU’s fight against big tech’s dominance is not about protectionism. In August, US antitrust enforcers secured a huge victory against Google when a federal court ruled that the company has maintained an illegal monopoly over online search, and another trial over its dominance of digital advertising is under way.
The ongoing US case against Google’s advertising monopoly tracks the European Commission’s findings last year in their case against the company, which concluded that only “mandatory divestment” of Google’s ad business would restore competition. While reports suggest that some EU regulators’ commitment to breaking up Google might be wavering, Ribera should hold firm. She should also consider assigning her best talent — such as the financial analysts behind the successful case against Apple — to the team designing a breakup.
More than technology is at stake. In a fractured EU increasingly threatened by the rise of far-right forces, European democracy itself is at risk. Ribera sounded the alarm in May, warning that the bloc faces a possible “implosion,” driven partly by the far right’s use of digital tools to spread disinformation and incite hatred. Meanwhile, big tech’s digital-advertising monopoly has devastated the economic foundation of European journalism, making it harder to combat online manipulation and protect democratic institutions. To build consensus on the Green Deal, Ribera should ensure a level playing field that enables the press to do its job.
The crises facing the natural and digital worlds are increasingly interconnected. In a recent essay, Maria Farrell and Robin Berjon propose a potential solution to both: “rewilding.” Once a diverse and healthy ecosystem, the Internet has become a sterile, tightly controlled space, they said. Restoring its vitality will require sweeping structural reforms.
In other words, meaningful change requires dismantling the monopolistic forces that have turned the internet into a walled garden. As Farrell and Berjon explain, “rewilding a built environment isn’t just sitting back and seeing what tender, living thing can force its way through the concrete”; rather, it is about “razing to the ground the structures that block out light for everyone not rich enough to live on the top floor.”
Europeans deserve better than what today’s tech giants are offering. While a competitive and sustainable EU is within reach, rewilding Europe’s economy will require decisive action to curb the invasive monopolies that dominate the digital ecosystem, consume our resources and pollute our public square. Ribera’s new role gives her powerful tools to clear the way for green innovation to take root. The right way to start is by breaking up big tech.
Cori Crider is senior fellow at the Open Markets Institute and the Future of Tech Institute. She was a cofounder of Foxglove, a tech-justice non-governmental organization.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
The gutting of Voice of America (VOA) and Radio Free Asia (RFA) by US President Donald Trump’s administration poses a serious threat to the global voice of freedom, particularly for those living under authoritarian regimes such as China. The US — hailed as the model of liberal democracy — has the moral responsibility to uphold the values it champions. In undermining these institutions, the US risks diminishing its “soft power,” a pivotal pillar of its global influence. VOA Tibetan and RFA Tibetan played an enormous role in promoting the strong image of the US in and outside Tibet. On VOA Tibetan,
Sung Chien-liang (宋建樑), the leader of the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) efforts to recall Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Lee Kun-cheng (李坤城), caused a national outrage and drew diplomatic condemnation on Tuesday after he arrived at the New Taipei City District Prosecutors’ Office dressed in a Nazi uniform. Sung performed a Nazi salute and carried a copy of Adolf Hitler’s Mein Kampf as he arrived to be questioned over allegations of signature forgery in the recall petition. The KMT’s response to the incident has shown a striking lack of contrition and decency. Rather than apologizing and distancing itself from Sung’s actions,
US President Trump weighed into the state of America’s semiconductor manufacturing when he declared, “They [Taiwan] stole it from us. They took it from us, and I don’t blame them. I give them credit.” At a prior White House event President Trump hosted TSMC chairman C.C. Wei (魏哲家), head of the world’s largest and most advanced chip manufacturer, to announce a commitment to invest US$100 billion in America. The president then shifted his previously critical rhetoric on Taiwan and put off tariffs on its chips. Now we learn that the Trump Administration is conducting a “trade investigation” on semiconductors which
By now, most of Taiwan has heard Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) threats to initiate a vote of no confidence against the Cabinet. His rationale is that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP)-led government’s investigation into alleged signature forgery in the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) recall campaign constitutes “political persecution.” I sincerely hope he goes through with it. The opposition currently holds a majority in the Legislative Yuan, so the initiation of a no-confidence motion and its passage should be entirely within reach. If Chiang truly believes that the government is overreaching, abusing its power and targeting political opponents — then
RSS