India has a plan to carve out a beachhead in the battle for commercial space, officials say: crunching space data, building small satellites and launching them cheaply into orbit, rather than challenging heavyweights such as SpaceX head-on.
In particular, it is taking aim at providing cost-effective services and hardware to sectors such as communications, agriculture and commodities, where high-quality data is a precious resource.
At stake is a launch market worth US$14.54 billion by 2031, and a related data services market pegged at US$45 billion by 2030.
Illustration: Mountain People
“The world has gone from satellites the size of a Boeing plane to the size of a laptop,” Indian Space Association director-general Anil Kumar Bhatt said. “This is a sector that India can win, instead of challenging heavy launches where Elon Musk has dominance. The country already has an historical advantage in data mining and interpretation.”
India has since February opened its space sector to private players and created a 10 billion rupee (US$119 million) venture fund to support space start-ups. It has also unveiled plans for crewed space exploration and a mission to Venus, but the focus is on developing commercial ventures.
In many ways it would be an uphill fight. Other countries such as Japan and China have advanced space industries, and designs on cheap launches. Spaceflight itself is difficult; the start-up landscape globally is littered with failed boosters and satellite designs.
For India, “the tech is there and the ability is there... but space is tricky and very competitive, and while private companies have shown that they can create a niche for themselves, we need more proof of concept,” Arizona State University space policy expert Namrata Goswami said.
The Indian government must be an “anchor customer” for private industry, she added.
Most of the revenue growth is expected to come from so-called downstream data applications, said Pawan Goenka, chairman of the Indian National Space Promotion and Authorization Center, India’s space regulatory body.
Those involve crunching data from orbit to help improve crop yields on earth, build more accurate navigation systems, bolster telecommunications, tighten border security and fight climate change, Goenka said.
Indian companies such as Bellatrix Aerospace, Pixxel, Agnikul Cosmos, Dhruva Space and others are already building, or have launched, small satellites or satellite components.
India’s space agency, the Indian Space Research Organisation (ISRO), last month completed the third and final developmental flight for its Small Satellite Launch Vehicle. The design would then be handed to private companies.
“The end uses of Earth observation are vast,” Goenka said. “What we are doing is address various parts of the puzzle.”
For example, Bengaluru-based SatSure has been providing near real-time satellite data to the Airports Authority of India to enhance air traffic management and safety, helping airlines save fuel costs through improved flight planning.
The project is expected to save 37.5 billion rupees in fuel costs for airlines annually by next year and result in about 70 percent reduction in airport process planning timelines, the authority said.
Earth observation (EO) satellites — orbiting cameras and sensors — can unlock similar savings in other areas, SatSure CEO Prateep Basu said.
“EO is solving problems that span across utilities, navigation, trading [and] industries, helping save millions of dollars,” Basu said.
Since the government opened up the market, companies big and small have jumped in, with legacy information technology firms such as Infosys investing in satellite imaging company GalaxEye Space Solutions, Google-backed Pixxel signing contracts with NASA, and Baring and Promus-backed SatSure taking on clients such as HDFC Bank and global seed company Syngenta.
Dhruva Space became one of the first to be handed a permit to operate satellite communication centers on earth — to date the dominion of ISRO.
“India is a software powerhouse and produces some of the best minds in the world in data science, machine learning and artificial intelligence. The space downstream market is, at the end of the day, a software play,” Terrawatch Space founder Aravind Ravichandran said.
The consultancy Euroconsult forecasts that between last year and 2032, about 26,104 small satellites — weighing less than 500kg — would be put in orbit, averaging 1.5 tonnes of daily launch mass. The firm expects the overall small satellite industry to be worth US$110.5 billion in the next decade.
Indian space companies have already seen an influx of funding — US$126 million last year, a 7 percent increase from the US$118 million raised in 2022 and an increase of 235 percent from the US$37.6 million raised in 2021, Tracxn data showed.
India has only about 2 percent of market share in commercial space activities. Demand is still largely dependent on global clients, and well-established US, Russian and Chinese companies are formidable rivals.
“To truly make a dent, [Indian] solutions have to scale to the rest of South Asia and then to the rest of the world,” Pixxel founder and CEO Awais Ahmed said.
US President Donald Trump created some consternation in Taiwan last week when he told a news conference that a successful trade deal with China would help with “unification.” Although the People’s Republic of China has never ruled Taiwan, Trump’s language struck a raw nerve in Taiwan given his open siding with Russian President Vladimir Putin’s aggression seeking to “reunify” Ukraine and Russia. On earlier occasions, Trump has criticized Taiwan for “stealing” the US’ chip industry and for relying too much on the US for defense, ominously presaging a weakening of US support for Taiwan. However, further examination of Trump’s remarks in
As strategic tensions escalate across the vast Indo-Pacific region, Taiwan has emerged as more than a potential flashpoint. It is the fulcrum upon which the credibility of the evolving American-led strategy of integrated deterrence now rests. How the US and regional powers like Japan respond to Taiwan’s defense, and how credible the deterrent against Chinese aggression proves to be, will profoundly shape the Indo-Pacific security architecture for years to come. A successful defense of Taiwan through strengthened deterrence in the Indo-Pacific would enhance the credibility of the US-led alliance system and underpin America’s global preeminence, while a failure of integrated deterrence would
It is being said every second day: The ongoing recall campaign in Taiwan — where citizens are trying to collect enough signatures to trigger re-elections for a number of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislators — is orchestrated by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), or even President William Lai (賴清德) himself. The KMT makes the claim, and foreign media and analysts repeat it. However, they never show any proof — because there is not any. It is alarming how easily academics, journalists and experts toss around claims that amount to accusing a democratic government of conspiracy — without a shred of evidence. These
China on May 23, 1951, imposed the so-called “17-Point Agreement” to formally annex Tibet. In March, China in its 18th White Paper misleadingly said it laid “firm foundations for the region’s human rights cause.” The agreement is invalid in international law, because it was signed under threat. Ngapo Ngawang Jigme, head of the Tibetan delegation sent to China for peace negotiations, was not authorized to sign the agreement on behalf of the Tibetan government and the delegation was made to sign it under duress. After seven decades, Tibet remains intact and there is global outpouring of sympathy for Tibetans. This realization